173 Comments
User's avatar
Matt CC's avatar

Really interesting

I have done similar graphs but can't work put how to share. If you track the two arms by the datum how long they had been in the study that looks pretty suspect . Also all the date of tests gives an insight as apparently they weren't running test on weekends (weirdly) and most of the silummer there was little virus about

Pfizer worked it backwards and knew how many cases were needed to claim 95% and aimed for that (I recall there was a note in the design to that effect). Interestingly that same dubious graph was used in the AZ propaganda and they took the same methodology. Coincidence I am sure. 2 tictacs taken 14 days apart with an exclusion definition will also work well.

Basically the whole design is a nonsense as Doshi called it out in 2020 in his BMA article.

But protocol 8.1.3 (I think it is) noted they wouldn't even bother testing if symptoms were overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity. Thereby favouring the BNT arm for not testing. They also excluded more BNT participants for unclear protocol breaches than the placebo arm (to an extent that invalidates and claimed efficacy)

They then hurriedly burnt the data by jabbing the placebo arm. To ruin the control group. The hallmark of an orchestrated sham.

Oh and it didn't work in the real world either. And the knew it as intramuscular vaccines don't induce a mucosal response . They knew it and gamed the world.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Thanks for adding that. I did want to get in the additional information about symptoms overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity (therefore allocated as reactogenicity instead of COVID symptoms), but it was too complex to relate in a lay manner and the article was already long.

It's an important point though as are your others, concisely summarised.

Expand full comment
Matt CC's avatar

There is one dataset (ISARIC case report forms) which will prove or otherwise its efficacy. It records symptoms date and hospitalisation date. From Dec 2020 they also started recording vaccine jab dates.

Isaric doesn't exist as a separate legal entity. Uni of Oxford is the data controller (see their &Cs) so it should be FOIA-able.

In the UK (over) reporting of nosocomial infection in hospitals summer 2020 kept the pandemic alive. In the UK they assumed anyone in hospital admitted in the last 14 days were likely an external infection not nosocomical - hogwash). This data set will also cast light on this.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Uni of Oxford is the most corrupted university on the planet, care of Trisha Greenhalgh and Ben Goldacre.

They are an embarrassment to education.

Expand full comment
KT-SunWillShineAgain's avatar

Very tragic that Uni of Oxford has sullied their reputation--i took their AstraZeneca (and so did QEII and PP) and immediately realized what a huge mistake I had made and still paying the price 4 1/2 years later. Meanwhile the public just assumed that QEII was dying of "old age" Instead of SPED (spike Protein Endothelium Disease) or Systemic Vasculitis where vascular system becomes so inflamed and damaged that blood flow is impaired such that purple blotches can clearly be seen in photos taken shortly before she died.. This is conjecture btw.

So the data testing was fraudulent. I suppose someone decided the UK has too many old age pensioners.

Those who told their coworkers at the NHS that these shots were highly toxic were fired for gross professional misconduct.

Those so called vaccine mandates were ordered from the top down, so the H in NHS now stands for a different meaning from Health.

Expand full comment
MadashellGP's avatar

This alleges fraud with strong circumstantial evidence. It deserves a Special Counsel Investigation.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

I agree

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

The fact that Pfizer got away with such an outrageous "heist" is clear proof that Covid was a globally co-ordinated "plandemic".

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Pfizer “ got away” with NOTHING. There is ample evidence, beyond ANY doubt, of their willful negligence in this genocide. ( Democide) Both Pfizer & Moderna will eventually be brought down, but the damage has been done. And is continuing. 🤦‍♀️

Sasha Latypova & Katherine Watt - here on Substack, have been thorough & beyond brilliant, in their research & expert analysis. There are many more here. (Catherine Austin Fitts , & Michael Yeadon )

We don’t need more “ hearings” or special investigations, etc. It’s all been done. I’m not taking anything away from this master investigation post by the Dr. It’s thorough as well.

And actually may fill some blanks in that are much needed. It certainly wasn’t time wasted.

Government special hearings are!

They have done this. Internationally as well. Heartbreaking hearings that have led to ZERO lawsuits, bankruptcies, indictments, or jail time. This is why…

The people that planned this Covid chaos, also legislated for comprehensive immunity for all the guilty; manufacturers, distributors, vaccine administers, etc. , basically anyone involved.

It’s in the Prep Act. Under the “ emergency use authorization”.

What makes this so powerful is that any judicial process ( judge) is not permitted to even hear a case involving E.U.A. There have been several attempts, but all thrown out.

There is one in Leeuwarden, Sweden ( ?) that is proceeding, regarding several citizens harmed by Covid vaccines. One person died. Mainstream media is silent about it. It’s a civil case against very powerful people & my Substack heroes I mentioned were called as witnesses, but are still fighting to be heard.

Defendants include Bill Gates, George Soros, Pfizer CEO, & UK gov. officials.

We will see what happens & RFK jr. is able to make changes & help fight against this. Revoke/ repeal the Prep Act, or remove E.U.A. He is our hope!

Big Pharma & D.O.D., F.D.A., etc. made a lot of errors with the vaccine timeline, good practices in manufacturing & oversight of everything, but they literally KILLED it with the Immunity umbrella. ( prep act) 🙈

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

To a point I think you are right, but the EUA protections don't cover fraud. That's why Sasha's involvement was such a red flag. Her job was to distract the public with the idea that everything was authorised by the DoD and that the DoD were foisting a "bioweapon" on the world. That might be true in terms of DARPA and the COVID virus which led to the vaccine but the mRNA vaccine would never pass as a "bioweapon" in any rational court, so the argument is a side show. She did a great job, I have to admit, that sucked so many people in. Blame the DoD and let Pfizer off the hook. Nobody goes to jail and her pharma clients celebrate.

And a LOT of people fell for it.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Sorry, I don’t agree. I can tell you have thought a lot about this and I’m willing to look at all sides. That’s how we grow & change. Sasha can be rough around the edges in her communication style & extra stubborn , etc. but I never felt her accusations on the Covid vaccines, let Pfizer off the hook. I have followed her from the beginning & because she was in the industry, she was VERY critical, in detail, of Big Pharma & their intentional failures.

We don’t have to spend time discussing another Substack or debating her true motives. I stopped being a paid subscriber of hers because of her personality, in her writing. I like truth, I like facts, and I like it presented in a civil manner.

But, before I leave it completely, you know she was retired from the pharmaceutical industry prior to 2020? You say “ clients”, like she was still working. She worked for Pfizer for a bit, if I understand correctly, but had her own business much longer.

Ok, so you honestly don’t think the Covid vaccines wouldn’t pass as a “bioweapon ”in court? I thought the man that wrote the definition of what a “ weapon of mass destruction “ is,

( into official legal gov. records), already agreed that these deadly vaccines would qualify. No question.

And the tribal leaders society recently agreed, according to Joseph Sansone- Substack. There have been many, many independent studies that have found cancer causing ingredients, excess DNA( well over acceptable limit), & random metal garbage in them. I could show you the studies, done by reputable scientists & Dr.s. One works closely with Dr. Peter McCullough.

( Mulscher?)

The excess deaths here & internationally, since the “ vaccine” rollouts, would further show harms caused. The mere fact that Pfizer wanted their trial data hidden from the public for 75 years, should be a HUGE red flag door all of us. The

Daily Clout/ War room Pfizer documents ( of the trials & studies),

would show plenty of evidence to prove these fake vaccines did & continue to kill.

The argument to prove these are deadly shots would be pretty simple.

The hard part is finding a way to get them heard by ANY court. Costa Rica still has a case moving forward. LEEUWARDEN, Sweden has a civil case against many powerful people, involving a vaccine death and several injury cases. At the end of that trial,

the judge has the option to indict defendants on criminal charges.

Florida pulled the shots or made them extra difficult to receive. That says a lot. And many officials in Africa & Haiti , 4-5?, were basically assassinated for refusing shipments of the Covid vax into their countries.

( all were later replaced by pro- Covid vax officials)

That can’t all be explained by pure greed.

There’s a bigger plan here & it involves depopulation. And people have died from the vax, & deadly hospital protocols. People that NEVER tested positive for Covid, or were sick, but they got the vax & died, & continue to die. Young athletes have died suddenly from myocarditis, caused ( admittedly by Pfizer), from the poison shots. Also proven from specific autopsy procedures, explained by Dr . Peter Mc Cullough. Especially in Scotland, young soccer players have died, and miscarriages & still births from the shots alone, have skyrocketed. Not from the SARS virus, from these poison shots.

What about the scientists that PROVED that the Covid vaccine can get into individual cells & change them. That’s clearly “ biological”. And when they cause strokes, cancers, myocarditis, blood clots, fibrous clots, & more, that’s the “ weapon.”

It’s not a “ side show” when people are dying. It’s genocide. Research ( AIDS) Fauci & his history w/ viruses, deadly meds, and vaccines. ( Gates too)

These cannot all be coincidences.

I hope you & your readers research how deadly the ingredients are in the shots. The scientists that studied them, had a hard time, I’m sure, getting the vials. Why?

Because they made it illegal to independently study them. Really?

Why? Maybe because of all the different ingredients, in vials that should’ve all looked basically the same. Even non- scientists could see that the vials had different colors & weren’t the same, even in the same lots.

Truth wins, facts are important. I’m open to changing my mind about all this, if there’s proof. There would have to be a lot to counter the proof I’ve seen.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Sorry but I can only work on the basis of her actions. These include the attempts to doxx and harass people on our side, and her ongoing relationship with Borje Darpo and BCG. If you're not the target of her venom you probably think she's great. But everything she does is either useless or poison. If you want to give me an example of something that she contributed that was actually helpful (that wasn't someone else's work) please do.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Of everything I wrote about the vaccines, that’s your response?

I would rather win the war & not focus on a single battle. We are on the same team. I refuse to focus on battle scars. ✌️

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Apologies but I'm not on Sasha's team. That team is the pharma-DARPA cartel. Are you on that team now?

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

You may be interested in the summary I posted of Reiner Fuellmich’s 2022 Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Thank you! I’ve read about this but not thoroughly. It’s similar to the Leeuwarden case, in that the main attorney in the civil case was arrested unexpectedly and jailed. ( probably still is!) he was jailed for months, during the beginning of trial, no charges, etc.

The second prosecuting attorney took over & did a brilliant job. I’ll try and find you a summary.

Expand full comment
AMV's avatar

Intentional depopulation event by bioweapons and genocide of possibly a billion or more people mostly kept quiet. If you don’t understand that, you are blinded! Look around at all the people you know jab injured or jab died the last 5 years. There are no coincidences! I see it everywhere!

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

You probably know that Reiner Fuellmich has been banged up in jail for some time on what appear to be trumped up charges. Here’s a link to the substack he is using to put out audio commentaries on how he is fighting back: https://substack.com/@drreinerfuellmich and a recent YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwA1wmuvwZs.

Expand full comment
Douglas Brodie's avatar

I haven’t heard anything on the Leeuwarden “Crimes against Humanity” case for a while. Here’s a July post by reporter Jim Ferguson on the subject: https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1945420156718485845

Expand full comment
Julian Gillespie's avatar

a-mazing, Doc

now, Trump asked for answers from Pfizer and Moderna recently: ".. justify the success of their various Covid Drugs"

https://x.com/TrumpDailyPosts/status/1962540026379813184

.. he now knows what their vanilla replies will not contain - fixed CT testing security, compelling N-antibody data evidencing significant confirmations (lower in vaxed), supporting significantly lower fevers

this article needs to be placed squarley at the feet of both companies, and detailed replies pressed from each on every issue you have raised .. especially Pfizer

Bobby Kennedy Jr must do this because it is his sworn duty to do so .. and he is a damn good lawyer who knows this science too

.. as to do all global drug authorities who played along .. they too must ask about the emperor's clothes

well done again Doc

*hat/tip*

Expand full comment
Mouzer's avatar

I believe RFK Jr is using the time-honored strategy of incrementalism, taking them down using death by a thousand cuts. pHARMa is too powerful, having monetarily infected and subdued the independence of politics, TV, medical journals and schools, research and developement, drug distribution chains, and more. The last thing MAHA needs is combined pushback from all these pHARMa funding addicts.

Expand full comment
mejbcart's avatar

"Bobby Kennedy Jr must do this because it is his sworn duty to do so ..", after which he might be ending up like his uncle and father..., in which case he proofs of not being a chicken, but well, gone. This is a double sword fight, and indeed requires extraordinary brain power, and collaboration, kind of a Trojan horse structure in a good sense.

Expand full comment
Dingo Roberts's avatar

And yet here he is:

White House: Trump gets COVID shot in preparation for upcoming travel

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/10/10/president-trump-covid-shot-upcoming-travel/86634854007

Expand full comment
Lori's avatar

I am hoping Bobby talked him out of it and that this is a fib or saline. Not endorsing the Pres should lie but......

Expand full comment
J Debra Grube's avatar

When I was pregnant in the 70s and the 80s, we were advised no not just advised we were told no aspirin only a prenatal vitamin no alcohol you didn’t take anything over-the-counter let alone an unsupervised pharmaceutical. I think it’s heinous that they pushed this on pregnant women and so many of them spontaneously aborted or experienced infant death.

it’s murder. You can’t call it anything but what it is.

Expand full comment
Sh1rl3y's avatar

Great work. Thank you.

What I want to know is who told Pfizer to do it.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

The DoD. But the question is - who told them to do it?

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

The Ruling Psychopathy - the Usual Suspects - that are at the top of the pyramid of planetary power.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

To Dr. Syed,

It’s the globalists, internationally as well. Very wealthy ( understatement) old family rich, like Rothchilds, Rockefellers, etc. , plus the corporate rich, Bill Gates, George Soros, Zuckerberg, & elite from the W.H.O., & U.N., and some others like Anthony Fauci. Fauci had the same “ playbook” for AIDS, and very involved w/ Gates in Africa vaccines.

Many former Presidents, elite members of CIA, etc. from many different countries. I’m sure it’s a pyramid of power, constantly reshaping & adjusting. Many names of powerful influencers would not be familiar to most of us. This has been planned a long time, to eventually bring forth the “One World “ ( U.N.) agenda. Very few want to control the world.

This explains the international “ lockstep” response.

“ The Real Anthony Fauci” book by RFKjr was a real shock to me. I had no idea that CDC & NIH owns many vaccine patents that they supposedly regulate.

At the end of the book it explains the government involvement & specific individuals. It ends by saying “ We need to recognize that this is a vast human experiment on all of mankind, with an unproven technology, conducted by spies & generals primarily trained to kill and not to save lives”: Vera Sharav ( holocaust survivor & med. ethics advocate )

“ What could go wrong?” 🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment
Mouzer's avatar

Not long after DNA was mapped, concerns about using it to attack the USA arose. In Rebuilding Americas Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, the question of using DNA to attack was addressed. In this 2000 document it says that advanced forms of biological warfare that can target "specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool" can be found on page 60 https://archive.org/details/RebuildingAmericasDefenses/page/n71/mode/1up/search/bio-weapon

I believe this thinking put force and funding behind many studies, including the development of mRNA. Fear and funding drove the work. It spread becoming a research-industrial-medical complex. As we know, labs were built around the world to identify and create organisms to try to get ahead of "the other guy" while psychological frameworks were developed to manipulate and control other populations and governments. At the same time, protocols and strategies were created to secure the population in case the other guy attacked.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf

IMO this was like adding vinegar to milk. Keep stirring in a little at a time, not much happens, but it forms lumps corrupting the milk. Eventually these coalesce into one giant blob with a character and structure all its own, taking over like the blob in that old movie. Now we have to freeze it before it takes everything from us. Are there global predators in the blob? Yes. They will always join where there is money and power to be had.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

..."and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker."...no, that is hook, line and syringe. Under the prep act and EUA, since this was declared a (covid) emergency, NO trials for mRNA poisons were required. All these fake trials were done for theater and that is why they were abysmally incomplete. With another faked pandemic, no trials will be necessary.

The fake trials were to assure the public of the safety and efficacy of the mRNA poisons. Most of the public bought it all...hook, line and several syringes and some are still buying it. The false fear of death created by some unseen object (in this case fake viruses) goes a long way towards getting people to do what you want them to do. That is big pharma's number one marketing tool (the fear of death)...executed marvelously by your local witch-doctor.

But if you look at the last 40 years of drugs trials, big pharma aided and abetted by its henchmen the FDA/CDC, have conducted numerous drug trials that are nothing more than a bastardization of numbers and outcomes. This is especially true of cancer drugs. Not to mention that NO vaccines that are given to children in droves have ever undergone any strenuous and complete trials against placebos or for more than a few months.

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

Thank you so much for your work on this. In his novel The Constant Gardener, Le Carre writes in the end notes

“This is, of course, a work of fiction. The pharmaceutical industry I describe is an invention. The characters are all imaginary, and none bears any resemblance to any person, living or dead.

But I can tell you that the reality would make the fiction look relatively innocent.”

Nothing has changed then, unless it’s just got worse.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Yes. It HAS gotten worse in my 70+ years! We are at an end stage inflection point for Humankind. The next few years will be "interesting", indeed. The good news is that Cheeto Jeezus was reportedly COVID vax boosted during his recent trip to Walter Reed. If this be true, it is just a matter of time, The bad news is that his replacements - acolytes of Thiel and zio-christian zealots - stand in the wings ready to replace The Don...

Expand full comment
Jaime Jessop's avatar

Confirmation that EUA for the Pfizer vaccine worldwide was just a rubber stamping exercise and that claims by regulators to have 'thoroughly analysed' the Pfizer trial data were a sham. In Britain, June Raine's 'Big Pharma enabling' MHRA became the first drugs regulator to grant EUA to the Pfizer 'vaccine'. As Matt Hancock told Parliament on December 2 2020:

"Any vaccine must go through a rigorous process of clinical trials involving thousands of people, and extensive independent scrutiny from the MHRA, one of the world’s most respected medical regulators.

Today, I am delighted to inform the House that the MHRA has issued the clinical authorisation of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This is a monumental step forward. It’s no longer if there’s a vaccine, it’s when. In our battle against the virus, help is on its way.

Today is a triumph for all those who believe in science, a triumph for ingenuity and a triumph for humanity. I want to thank everyone who has played their part in this achievement. The team at Pfizer and BioNTech, the volunteers who stepped up and took part in clinical trials and to the MHRA themselves who have made sure that this is a vaccine that we can all have faith in.

Thanks to their efforts, I can confirm that the UK is the first country in the world to have a clinically approved coronavirus vaccine for supply."

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/an-update-on-the-coronavirus-vaccine-2-december-2020

The wonderful MHRA stepped up and did that "extensive independent scrutiny" in order to be the first regulator in the world to issue EUA for the humanity saving Pfizer jab. Except they didn't. They claimed that Public Health England had done the analysis, but then PHE said they hadn't!

Seems like the 'science deniers' were right all along.

Expand full comment
Shifted Paradigms's avatar

Brilliant. As always, as we have come to expect from your writing and investigations.

Expand full comment
Dr. Manfred Hauptreif's avatar

Thank you so much, I never read such a comprehensive article unreveling the 95 % scam! And: I will remember!

Expand full comment
Mark Neugebauer's avatar

Hunt and Bourla.....

"Safe and Effective?" "Very advanced, cool science I would say" - Albert Bourla, CEO Pfizer.

https://substack.com/@neugie/note/c-165512783?r=yi4k6&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web

And what about Billy boy? - https://open.substack.com/pub/elizabethhart/p/bill-gates-we-dont-know-for-sure?r=yi4k6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

NEVER FORGET!..

Expand full comment
SmallSlugLargeLettuce's avatar

Did they really go to this much trouble to just push sales of there new product?

I know some think it is purely just about the money but really?

The western world in particular does seem a very different place since the C19 event.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

It was always about power and control. The money is just a tool to implement that.

Expand full comment
TnDoc's avatar

Absolutely!

Expand full comment
Fredy G.'s avatar

Not for the sale of their new product , but for the implementation and normalizing of a product line and the associated regulatory and public response framework . Not just money but endless streams of it . Let's face it , politicians never agree on anything , yet with Covid they did it on a global scale beyond anything else , ever . In effect it was the last step in a decade or decades old plan .

Expand full comment
Dingo Roberts's avatar

Pharma, like all businesses, is interested in increasing market share. They do this not only by developing new products, but by generating new customers. The ultimate way to do this is by selling their products to people who aren't even sick. Among the ways they do that is by changing the diagnostic criteria for diagnoses like hypertension. The diagnosis doesn't even have to be an illness, like high cholesterol.

But the ultimate way to sell product to people who aren't sick is with vaccines. Ok, so they have those; how to increase that market share when most people don't think they need them? By generating terror about various viruses (that's what the media had been doing for years, long before COVID) that creates public pressure for leaders to "do something" to protect everybody = vaccine mandates. Is there a better way to generate business than by forcing EVERYBODY to use your product whether you want it or not? The problem with vaccines is that they take an average of 10 years of work before they're approved.

The next issue is return on investment. ROI for pharma has been taking a nose dive for decades, to the point in 2020 when it was down to around zero. Creating novel drugs has been futile; all the low-hanging disease fruit has already been picked. Drugs are running out of patents and being sold by generics.

Pharma was in a desperate situation and mRNA was seen as the savior, were it not for the fact that is was disastrously disastrous as far as safety was concerned. That's why Merck, Roche, and Novartis bailed out of even trying. If only they could get the mRNA platform approved, subsequent vaccines could be approved quickly based on the fact that the platform had been pre-approved. So they terrorized the public to the point where they demanded something NOW. Eliminate the safety testing, fudge the trials, and they cleared the way for a superhighway of new vaccines and other drugs that could be approved in record time.

Expand full comment
SmallSlugLargeLettuce's avatar

👍🤝 Safe&Effective all the way$$$$$$$$$$$$

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

🎯 BINGO!

Expand full comment
Nadine Connock's avatar

The other Trojan horse aspect to this whether by design or just subsequentlial is the judicial interference. The Pfizer contracts signed are in estimate of 120 nations/countries. The Waiver of Sovereign Immunity puts constitutional interference by a single supplier on a par of the United Nations treaty or the WTO agreement. Pfizer contracts required Statutory and Regulatory Authority capable of upholding the indemnity and debt fund (compensation) which looked to be required as an Advanced Purchase Agreement in order to commence contractual negotiations. This contractual blackmail by coercion/duress enforced illegal laws to circumvent protections under every caveat possible. Human Rights, Commercial Trade, Intellectual Property, Consumer Contracts Act, Employment Relations, Work and Safety...you name it they had to overrule it or retrospectively rewrite Local State and National Bills and Legislation worldwide to protect against litigation. A full judicial reset. With a tsunami of amendments to regulations and legislations ensuring compliance to uphold the indemnity, cover their tracks and hold the Purchaser responsible. This is akin to domestic terrorism and vaccine terrorism as Gravitas called it. The seizure of rule of law and the weaponization of regulatory capture.

Expand full comment
Marc G. Wathelet's avatar

Excellent work, as usual, thank you for your efforts and everything you have done on behalf of the victims of this scam. I just happened to have a discussion on a substack with a polite fellow trashing a 2 pages letter, a case report, that showed Spike positive cells in a breast cancer metastasis to the skin. So I asked him if the could apply the same superb critical skills to the Pfizer study, and, unsurprisingly, crickets so far... It's that double standard of the doxa proponents that makes "debates" on social networks so unproductive.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

It's absolutely a major part of the problem. As I might have said before, if your drug was that good why would you need to go to such extents (threats, blackmail, bribery, denial) to promote it? It would just sell itself.

Expand full comment
Stephen Dedalus's avatar

….or legal chicanery. Why has so little been written about the Comirnaty bait-and-switch? “Legally distinct,” seriously? Does PREP protect the pharmacist from deceitfully administering Bio-N-Tech when it was Comirnaty that was given full FDA approval for the reassurance of the otherwise deeply skeptical and suspicious patient? This is not 3rd degree involuntary manslaughter; it’s first degree premeditated murder. They’re not fools; they’re knaves.

Expand full comment
AlmostLastRepublicaninSeattle's avatar

Keep making your point. Even if you think it’s “ unproductive.” It’s not. Lots of people are reading what you write, and not responding. Sometimes the

“ crickets” are people slowly changing their minds about the whole thing.

I did. I got 2 Moderna shots, THEN I started to research. So unlike me, but it was a weird time for sure. And unfortunately, I always trusted health agencies & “ experts.” It’s embarrassing now! 🤦‍♀️

One day, here on Substack, I read someone say, “ just for a day, imagine that it’s all true. That Covid vaccines are a scam, that lockdowns & masks aren’t science based, etc., etc., that media was paid off…”

And it all clicked for me. And I’ve never looked back. 5 years later, still researching & here on Substack. It’s been a crazy ride, and serious paradigm shifts happened for me.

Truth wins & facts are facts. 👍🏼

Expand full comment
Cindy Simpson's avatar

As a CPA and auditor, I’d been pointing out the potential for manipulation of the PCR testing in the trials since December 2020. In any analysis of a flowchart of the trial design, the PCR testing section would have been identified as the number one potential weakness requiring the strictest of monitoring and control. (And really, “self-reported symptoms” vs regular testing, especially when the prevailing narrative was asymptomatic “silent spreaders” was also pretty ridiculous.) But that the PCR testing was so key to producing the efficacy numbers— (along with the narrative that numbers don’t lie) made the it ripe for fraud.

The lack of detailed disclosure regarding the cycle threshold rates used, whether they were consistent for the duration of the trial and equal in both trial arms—all concerning—but more so was why the prevailing experts weren’t talking about this critical aspect of the trial and asking questions. The censoring of those who did ask along with the blackout made the suspicion of fraud even more compelling.

It was so welcome to see your thorough analysis that succinctly and brilliantly proved the fraud us non-experts spotted early on as non-sensical narrative of efficacy. We just didn’t have the data to prove it.

Also, since the marketing narrative focused on the “efficacy” rate—no one in the media asked and none of their experts seemed to notice that extremely few participants were even reported as having an infection. Just a few hundred out of over 40,000? Yet they insisted the “pandemic” was so dangerous that a warp-speed, new platform “vaccine” was crucial?

And why weren’t more questions asked about the participants, such as were they mostly isolating, did they have household members working in healthcare front lines, etc?

Really, it seems the only thing the trial proved was how little the danger Covid posed to the public, and how little the public was informed of the truth.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Absolutely

Expand full comment