I have done similar graphs but can't work put how to share. If you track the two arms by the datum how long they had been in the study that looks pretty suspect . Also all the date of tests gives an insight as apparently they weren't running test on weekends (weirdly) and most of the silummer there was little virus about
Pfizer worked it backwards and knew how many cases were needed to claim 95% and aimed for that (I recall there was a note in the design to that effect). Interestingly that same dubious graph was used in the AZ propaganda and they took the same methodology. Coincidence I am sure. 2 tictacs taken 14 days apart with an exclusion definition will also work well.
Basically the whole design is a nonsense as Doshi called it out in 2020 in his BMA article.
But protocol 8.1.3 (I think it is) noted they wouldn't even bother testing if symptoms were overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity. Thereby favouring the BNT arm for not testing. They also excluded more BNT participants for unclear protocol breaches than the placebo arm (to an extent that invalidates and claimed efficacy)
They then hurriedly burnt the data by jabbing the placebo arm. To ruin the control group. The hallmark of an orchestrated sham.
Oh and it didn't work in the real world either. And the knew it as intramuscular vaccines don't induce a mucosal response . They knew it and gamed the world.
Thanks for adding that. I did want to get in the additional information about symptoms overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity (therefore allocated as reactogenicity instead of COVID symptoms), but it was too complex to relate in a lay manner and the article was already long.
It's an important point though as are your others, concisely summarised.
There is one dataset (ISARIC case report forms) which will prove or otherwise its efficacy. It records symptoms date and hospitalisation date. From Dec 2020 they also started recording vaccine jab dates.
Isaric doesn't exist as a separate legal entity. Uni of Oxford is the data controller (see their &Cs) so it should be FOIA-able.
In the UK (over) reporting of nosocomial infection in hospitals summer 2020 kept the pandemic alive. In the UK they assumed anyone in hospital admitted in the last 14 days were likely an external infection not nosocomical - hogwash). This data set will also cast light on this.
.. he now knows what their vanilla replies will not contain - fixed CT testing security, compelling N-antibody data evidencing significant confirmations (lower in vaxed), supporting significantly lower fevers
this article needs to be placed squarley at the feet of both companies, and detailed replies pressed from each on every issue you have raised .. especially Pfizer
Bobby Kennedy Jr must do this because it is his sworn duty to do so .. and he is a damn good lawyer who knows this science too
.. as to do all global drug authorities who played along .. they too must ask about the emperor's clothes
Confirmation that EUA for the Pfizer vaccine worldwide was just a rubber stamping exercise and that claims by regulators to have 'thoroughly analysed' the Pfizer trial data were a sham. In Britain, June Raine's 'Big Pharma enabling' MHRA became the first drugs regulator to grant EUA to the Pfizer 'vaccine'. As Matt Hancock told Parliament on December 2 2020:
"Any vaccine must go through a rigorous process of clinical trials involving thousands of people, and extensive independent scrutiny from the MHRA, one of the world’s most respected medical regulators.
Today, I am delighted to inform the House that the MHRA has issued the clinical authorisation of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This is a monumental step forward. It’s no longer if there’s a vaccine, it’s when. In our battle against the virus, help is on its way.
Today is a triumph for all those who believe in science, a triumph for ingenuity and a triumph for humanity. I want to thank everyone who has played their part in this achievement. The team at Pfizer and BioNTech, the volunteers who stepped up and took part in clinical trials and to the MHRA themselves who have made sure that this is a vaccine that we can all have faith in.
Thanks to their efforts, I can confirm that the UK is the first country in the world to have a clinically approved coronavirus vaccine for supply."
The wonderful MHRA stepped up and did that "extensive independent scrutiny" in order to be the first regulator in the world to issue EUA for the humanity saving Pfizer jab. Except they didn't. They claimed that Public Health England had done the analysis, but then PHE said they hadn't!
Seems like the 'science deniers' were right all along.
Not for the sale of their new product , but for the implementation and normalizing of a product line and the associated regulatory and public response framework . Not just money but endless streams of it . Let's face it , politicians never agree on anything , yet with Covid they did it on a global scale beyond anything else , ever . In effect it was the last step in a decade or decades old plan .
..."and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker."...no, that is hook, line and syringe. Under the prep act and EUA, since this was declared a (covid) emergency, NO trials for mRNA poisons were required. All these fake trials were done for theater and that is why they were abysmally incomplete. With another faked pandemic, no trials will be necessary.
The fake trials were to assure the public of the safety and efficacy of the mRNA poisons. Most of the public bought it all...hook, line and several syringes and some are still buying it. The false fear of death created by some unseen object (in this case fake viruses) goes a long way towards getting people to do what you want them to do. That is big pharma's number one marketing tool (the fear of death)...executed marvelously by your local witch-doctor.
But if you look at the last 40 years of drugs trials, big pharma aided and abetted by its henchmen the FDA/CDC, have conducted numerous drug trials that are nothing more than a bastardization of numbers and outcomes. This is especially true of cancer drugs. Not to mention that NO vaccines that are given to children in droves have ever undergone any strenuous and complete trials against placebos or for more than a few months.
Ah Kahn Syed clearly - a commanding sweep with masterful command from a grounded perspective = a true Capo Lavoro. Fake "science" joined with MSM fake spectacularization to promote MDM (mis, dis, mal) information in an effort to Make Authority Great Again. Goebbels is reveling.
Thank you so much for your work on this. In his novel The Constant Gardener, Le Carre writes in the end notes
“This is, of course, a work of fiction. The pharmaceutical industry I describe is an invention. The characters are all imaginary, and none bears any resemblance to any person, living or dead.
But I can tell you that the reality would make the fiction look relatively innocent.”
Nothing has changed then, unless it’s just got worse.
Yes. It HAS gotten worse in my 70+ years! We are at an end stage inflection point for Humankind. The next few years will be "interesting", indeed. The good news is that Cheeto Jeezus was reportedly COVID vax boosted during his recent trip to Walter Reed. If this be true, it is just a matter of time, The bad news is that his replacements - acolytes of Thiel and zio-christian zealots - stand in the wings ready to replace The Don...
Excellent work, as usual, thank you for your efforts and everything you have done on behalf of the victims of this scam. I just happened to have a discussion on a substack with a polite fellow trashing a 2 pages letter, a case report, that showed Spike positive cells in a breast cancer metastasis to the skin. So I asked him if the could apply the same superb critical skills to the Pfizer study, and, unsurprisingly, crickets so far... It's that double standard of the doxa proponents that makes "debates" on social networks so unproductive.
It's absolutely a major part of the problem. As I might have said before, if your drug was that good why would you need to go to such extents (threats, blackmail, bribery, denial) to promote it? It would just sell itself.
What is also telling is that periods of the worst vaccine adverse events due to vaccine reaction, vaccine injury and breakthrough infections are commonly removed by saying it is not expected to work for the first 7-21 days is bad enough because the test and real world subjects actually have to live through those days even if the statistics are ignored. The double insult to the actual data is that the placebo arm does not get the same number of days of time out in their data collection, in practice these waiting to be vaccinated adverse events were often shifted into the unvaccinated totals because they were not yet vaccinated.
Penn & Teller appear harmless yet beneficial so they can help to prop up required narratives. They are part of the Hollywood propaganda machine like most other entertainers. I always think about those who are pushed out of Hollywood. A strong man actor (something like He-man, Conan, Herculese but not those I think) was not prepared to toe the line and was shunned by Hollywood. Became a director of wholesome movies. I wish I remembered his name but searching now and in the past I fail to locate it, I saw a YouTube interview with him.
Looking at the research, how many people were actually exposed to "covid" to determine any of big pharma's claims? That bit was uncontrolled... Therefore zero conclusions could be drawn in the first place. A gigantic (and deadly) scam, it's literally an observational study of who contracted a respiratory illness during their very short trial, and the numbers were pretty low in each group as an aside... But the question still remains... Who was actually exposed to covid to test their (cough) "vaccine"?
Even Louis Pasteur claimed to expose all his chicken subjects to chicken cholera, as that's the big of the experiment that proved his vaccine worked, so did we expose all participants in the Pfizer trial to Covid?
Really interesting
I have done similar graphs but can't work put how to share. If you track the two arms by the datum how long they had been in the study that looks pretty suspect . Also all the date of tests gives an insight as apparently they weren't running test on weekends (weirdly) and most of the silummer there was little virus about
Pfizer worked it backwards and knew how many cases were needed to claim 95% and aimed for that (I recall there was a note in the design to that effect). Interestingly that same dubious graph was used in the AZ propaganda and they took the same methodology. Coincidence I am sure. 2 tictacs taken 14 days apart with an exclusion definition will also work well.
Basically the whole design is a nonsense as Doshi called it out in 2020 in his BMA article.
But protocol 8.1.3 (I think it is) noted they wouldn't even bother testing if symptoms were overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity. Thereby favouring the BNT arm for not testing. They also excluded more BNT participants for unclear protocol breaches than the placebo arm (to an extent that invalidates and claimed efficacy)
They then hurriedly burnt the data by jabbing the placebo arm. To ruin the control group. The hallmark of an orchestrated sham.
Oh and it didn't work in the real world either. And the knew it as intramuscular vaccines don't induce a mucosal response . They knew it and gamed the world.
Thanks for adding that. I did want to get in the additional information about symptoms overlapping with vaccine reactogenicity (therefore allocated as reactogenicity instead of COVID symptoms), but it was too complex to relate in a lay manner and the article was already long.
It's an important point though as are your others, concisely summarised.
There is one dataset (ISARIC case report forms) which will prove or otherwise its efficacy. It records symptoms date and hospitalisation date. From Dec 2020 they also started recording vaccine jab dates.
Isaric doesn't exist as a separate legal entity. Uni of Oxford is the data controller (see their &Cs) so it should be FOIA-able.
In the UK (over) reporting of nosocomial infection in hospitals summer 2020 kept the pandemic alive. In the UK they assumed anyone in hospital admitted in the last 14 days were likely an external infection not nosocomical - hogwash). This data set will also cast light on this.
Uni of Oxford is the most corrupted university on the planet, care of Trisha Greenhalgh and Ben Goldacre.
They are an embarrassment to education.
This alleges fraud with strong circumstantial evidence. It deserves a Special Counsel Investigation.
I agree
The fact that Pfizer got away with such an outrageous "heist" is clear proof that Covid was a globally co-ordinated "plandemic".
a-mazing, Doc
now, Trump asked for answers from Pfizer and Moderna recently: ".. justify the success of their various Covid Drugs"
https://x.com/TrumpDailyPosts/status/1962540026379813184
.. he now knows what their vanilla replies will not contain - fixed CT testing security, compelling N-antibody data evidencing significant confirmations (lower in vaxed), supporting significantly lower fevers
this article needs to be placed squarley at the feet of both companies, and detailed replies pressed from each on every issue you have raised .. especially Pfizer
Bobby Kennedy Jr must do this because it is his sworn duty to do so .. and he is a damn good lawyer who knows this science too
.. as to do all global drug authorities who played along .. they too must ask about the emperor's clothes
well done again Doc
*hat/tip*
Brilliant. As always, as we have come to expect from your writing and investigations.
Hunt and Bourla.....
"Safe and Effective?" "Very advanced, cool science I would say" - Albert Bourla, CEO Pfizer.
https://substack.com/@neugie/note/c-165512783?r=yi4k6&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
And what about Billy boy? - https://open.substack.com/pub/elizabethhart/p/bill-gates-we-dont-know-for-sure?r=yi4k6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
NEVER FORGET!..
Confirmation that EUA for the Pfizer vaccine worldwide was just a rubber stamping exercise and that claims by regulators to have 'thoroughly analysed' the Pfizer trial data were a sham. In Britain, June Raine's 'Big Pharma enabling' MHRA became the first drugs regulator to grant EUA to the Pfizer 'vaccine'. As Matt Hancock told Parliament on December 2 2020:
"Any vaccine must go through a rigorous process of clinical trials involving thousands of people, and extensive independent scrutiny from the MHRA, one of the world’s most respected medical regulators.
Today, I am delighted to inform the House that the MHRA has issued the clinical authorisation of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This is a monumental step forward. It’s no longer if there’s a vaccine, it’s when. In our battle against the virus, help is on its way.
Today is a triumph for all those who believe in science, a triumph for ingenuity and a triumph for humanity. I want to thank everyone who has played their part in this achievement. The team at Pfizer and BioNTech, the volunteers who stepped up and took part in clinical trials and to the MHRA themselves who have made sure that this is a vaccine that we can all have faith in.
Thanks to their efforts, I can confirm that the UK is the first country in the world to have a clinically approved coronavirus vaccine for supply."
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/an-update-on-the-coronavirus-vaccine-2-december-2020
The wonderful MHRA stepped up and did that "extensive independent scrutiny" in order to be the first regulator in the world to issue EUA for the humanity saving Pfizer jab. Except they didn't. They claimed that Public Health England had done the analysis, but then PHE said they hadn't!
Seems like the 'science deniers' were right all along.
Great work. Thank you.
What I want to know is who told Pfizer to do it.
The DoD. But the question is - who told them to do it?
The Ruling Psychopathy - the Usual Suspects - that are at the top of the pyramid of planetary power.
Did they really go to this much trouble to just push sales of there new product?
I know some think it is purely just about the money but really?
The western world in particular does seem a very different place since the C19 event.
It was always about power and control. The money is just a tool to implement that.
Absolutely!
Not for the sale of their new product , but for the implementation and normalizing of a product line and the associated regulatory and public response framework . Not just money but endless streams of it . Let's face it , politicians never agree on anything , yet with Covid they did it on a global scale beyond anything else , ever . In effect it was the last step in a decade or decades old plan .
..."and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker."...no, that is hook, line and syringe. Under the prep act and EUA, since this was declared a (covid) emergency, NO trials for mRNA poisons were required. All these fake trials were done for theater and that is why they were abysmally incomplete. With another faked pandemic, no trials will be necessary.
The fake trials were to assure the public of the safety and efficacy of the mRNA poisons. Most of the public bought it all...hook, line and several syringes and some are still buying it. The false fear of death created by some unseen object (in this case fake viruses) goes a long way towards getting people to do what you want them to do. That is big pharma's number one marketing tool (the fear of death)...executed marvelously by your local witch-doctor.
But if you look at the last 40 years of drugs trials, big pharma aided and abetted by its henchmen the FDA/CDC, have conducted numerous drug trials that are nothing more than a bastardization of numbers and outcomes. This is especially true of cancer drugs. Not to mention that NO vaccines that are given to children in droves have ever undergone any strenuous and complete trials against placebos or for more than a few months.
Ah Kahn Syed clearly - a commanding sweep with masterful command from a grounded perspective = a true Capo Lavoro. Fake "science" joined with MSM fake spectacularization to promote MDM (mis, dis, mal) information in an effort to Make Authority Great Again. Goebbels is reveling.
Brilliant work! Dr. Syed! Thanks for sharing this with the world. Really appreciate your voice!
Thank you so much for your work on this. In his novel The Constant Gardener, Le Carre writes in the end notes
“This is, of course, a work of fiction. The pharmaceutical industry I describe is an invention. The characters are all imaginary, and none bears any resemblance to any person, living or dead.
But I can tell you that the reality would make the fiction look relatively innocent.”
Nothing has changed then, unless it’s just got worse.
Yes. It HAS gotten worse in my 70+ years! We are at an end stage inflection point for Humankind. The next few years will be "interesting", indeed. The good news is that Cheeto Jeezus was reportedly COVID vax boosted during his recent trip to Walter Reed. If this be true, it is just a matter of time, The bad news is that his replacements - acolytes of Thiel and zio-christian zealots - stand in the wings ready to replace The Don...
Excellent work, as usual, thank you for your efforts and everything you have done on behalf of the victims of this scam. I just happened to have a discussion on a substack with a polite fellow trashing a 2 pages letter, a case report, that showed Spike positive cells in a breast cancer metastasis to the skin. So I asked him if the could apply the same superb critical skills to the Pfizer study, and, unsurprisingly, crickets so far... It's that double standard of the doxa proponents that makes "debates" on social networks so unproductive.
It's absolutely a major part of the problem. As I might have said before, if your drug was that good why would you need to go to such extents (threats, blackmail, bribery, denial) to promote it? It would just sell itself.
What is also telling is that periods of the worst vaccine adverse events due to vaccine reaction, vaccine injury and breakthrough infections are commonly removed by saying it is not expected to work for the first 7-21 days is bad enough because the test and real world subjects actually have to live through those days even if the statistics are ignored. The double insult to the actual data is that the placebo arm does not get the same number of days of time out in their data collection, in practice these waiting to be vaccinated adverse events were often shifted into the unvaccinated totals because they were not yet vaccinated.
Penn & Teller appear harmless yet beneficial so they can help to prop up required narratives. They are part of the Hollywood propaganda machine like most other entertainers. I always think about those who are pushed out of Hollywood. A strong man actor (something like He-man, Conan, Herculese but not those I think) was not prepared to toe the line and was shunned by Hollywood. Became a director of wholesome movies. I wish I remembered his name but searching now and in the past I fail to locate it, I saw a YouTube interview with him.
Looking at the research, how many people were actually exposed to "covid" to determine any of big pharma's claims? That bit was uncontrolled... Therefore zero conclusions could be drawn in the first place. A gigantic (and deadly) scam, it's literally an observational study of who contracted a respiratory illness during their very short trial, and the numbers were pretty low in each group as an aside... But the question still remains... Who was actually exposed to covid to test their (cough) "vaccine"?
Even Louis Pasteur claimed to expose all his chicken subjects to chicken cholera, as that's the big of the experiment that proved his vaccine worked, so did we expose all participants in the Pfizer trial to Covid?
If not, then whole trial proved zip.