Wow, this is a lot to consume. I believe this is the first time I’ve read you. I will read it again and follow the links. I wouldn’t have been exposed to any of this had I not been pfizer covid shot injured. This period of time has really opened my eyes to the vast depth of corruption in the “medical” field. I had an inkling but disappointingly, I was taken in by the 24/7 fear mongering. I feel so scared and anxious about telling my then pregnant daughter in law to make sure she got the shot whilst pregnant. The constant fear pumped out that if pregnant women didn’t get the shot , their babies could be stillborn(which I have personal experience from years ago), or their babies could get multi inflammatory syndrome. My granddaughter was born but I noticed that she’s been behind the curve in walking, talking and repetitive behaviours. I feel so guilty that I opened my mouth.
I follow Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernan, Maryanne Demasi and the Old Geezers Carl Hanaghan and Tom Jefferson. For whatever reason I did not feel comfortable with Yeadon and didn’t care to listen to him further after the first time. Hindsight is 20/20 but I am so angry at myself for naively believing health Canada’s regulatory agency who claimed save and effective based on no evidence. The propaganda was pumped out to prime us not to believe the anti vaxxer scientists who had concerns. The reassurance that the shots were safe because they’d been working on the mRNA technology for decades which after the fact begs the question as to why it wasn’t brought to market at an earlier time.
I was shocked that there was no active, independent data collection implemented to look for signals on a technology never tried on humans before. Shocked that shot injuries were silenced, unacknowledged with no medical help or the heads up to doctors despite the “we are all in this together” lie. To this day suspiciously there is no diagnostic test, the onus is on the injured to prove causation. The statistics are flawed and come out as another lie to pull the wool over the public’s and doctor’s eyes.
The wealth and power have the financial means to suppress the truth, which is really scary, as well as the hoards of people who still believe in the system that propagated the lies.
Hi Vivien, thank you for sharing. What you describe here was felt regardless of which "side" phintel categorised you in their great fake divide. It was impossible to share concerns of any persuasion except the one pre-determined outcome. Never felt so "used". Understanding these methods of persuasion is why am still here 6 years later. https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/the-widow-maker-that-never-lies
I am sorry to hear you have been injured. In the UK, Mike saved many people from a similar fate. Please do not believe the lies you are told about him, I remember his actions at the time, early, before the vaccines (so called) were even available. He acted in good faith and put himself at risk to do this. The really shocking thing for me, was how few professional men had the courage and probity to support him.
I subscribed to Latypova for a week or so before I regretted that decision and unsubscribed. Yikes!
I thankfully had a lifelong interest in health and nutrition and knew what pharma was all about long before 2020. That along with the government pushing the shots 24/7…. something is up and it’s definitely not in my best interest. Best decision ever made and if I had to forgo a winter vacation so be it (the unvaccinated were essentially locked in Canada for 18 months unable to travel).
I'd like to know which arm of the intel agencies is coordinating you all - did they do the thing where they ask if you're a patriot at the same time as showing you clips of kompromat on you?
My point is that Mike is acting in good faith. Not that he is correct in all his beliefs.
The comments here attribute motives to him that are wrong and reprehensible. All proper political or scientific discussion has to contend with disagreement. I am much more suspicious of those who would enforce a false consensus, and those silly enough to want this.
Mike has also moved to taking legal and political action, as is necessary if we are to free ourselves.. Why do you trust those who want to fritter away your energy and time in endless discussion of pointless scientific minutiae?
Thank you very much for the time and effort connecting all of these complicated dots for our benefit. I remember watching a few videos early on by Mike Yeadon and yes, the “ex-Pfizer VP” title was a successful hook there at least initially. Over time, however, I found myself backing away. Same thing happened with Sasha Latypova. You get initially drawn in by their supposed credentials in a field where you have none, but over time, some underlying quality of their message clangs a discordant note that you can’t quite explain, but feel compelled to move on. I read this article in part because, in addition to Mike Yeadon, I remember seeing Wolfgang Wodarg in some videos as a member of Reiner Fuellmich’s “Coronavirus Investigative Committee.” And we all know how that ended up playing out for Mr. Fuellmich. So to learn that Yeadon and Wodarg ended up joining forces in this endeavor was very interesting and illustrative to me. The sheer scale of the manipulation that goes on ultimately may be what makes it so hard for the population at large to accept. It’s an overwhelming and disheartening notion. It reminds me of the saying “once a mind is expanded by an idea, it can’t return to its original shape.” Once you wake up to all of these shenanigans going on behind the scenes, you can’t go back to blissful ignorance and also have a challenging time interacting with those who choose to remain there.
Wow, you were very articulate giving my exact opinion! Especially, “drawn in by their credentials because you have none". Yes, but our God given discernment thankfully kicked in!
Which is exactly the intent. And when our mice friends exposed that, that's when she doubled her efforts to come after us - resulting in that ridiculous hit piece at Christmas on her substack.
It is of course an interesting supposition that her substack supposedly has over 1000 paid subscribers. For what? Repeating tired old messages about operation warp speed being a military operation so don't even bother to sue the government or call for accountability?
We are really expected to believe that in the day and age when many of the people affected by the biomedical mafia were terminated from employment or went bankrupt that thousands of them are willing to pay for her junk? Not a chance. As twitter's #sashagate episode showed most of her following is based on bots and fake accounts, which, the assumption can only be, are provided by those people (institutions) that have access to them - almost certainly funded by your tax dollars.
I have to admit to being taken in by Mike, back in 2021 - he seemed to saying the right things. If I'd paid attention to him for longer, I suspect Id've seen some things that raised an eyebrow. (I recently saw some garbage that raised both eyebrows.).
I have Jikky to thank for pointing me at the Ziarco thing and, as a consequence, have become more discerning. Some of the other people offering comment were easier to write off. (Jane Ruby, Sasha Latypova, Brian Ardiss, The Bayleys, the 5G conflationists, the self-ordered nano-machines proponents.).
The most useful lesson in this saga has been that background checks are mandatory. Where there is a lot of money, there will be someone who loves it...and we all know where that leads. What a thing it is to finally (begin to) understand how pharma, intel, health, and other aedificia ordinis novi exist hand in glove with each other - assuming, of course, you can even see the hand;-)
Thanks Chris I think that is the way to look at it. Unfortunately there are so many people who don't trust the government (rightly) who at the same time find it too easy to trust people who make claims that sound anti-government.
It's a fantastic lesson to learn and it can be very difficult to discern those who were themselves taken in (Ardis might fit into this category) against those who are pulling the strings (that would be Sasha Latypova and Jane Ruby). I actually have no idea which category Mike fits into but his substacks (and the weird Lioness of Judah that he is affiliated with) have continued to bash people like Jessica Rose who I value as a friend and colleague. They also bash Robert Malone relentlessly and a pattern therefore emerges when they spend more time bashing people who are working to expose pharma safety than the people that are responsible.
Brian might be genuine. My contention is one of diminishing returns (the spike is toxic - would cistronic sequences from 20+ critters really have been isolated and spliced into the SARS-CoV-2 genome?) and I am willing to stand corrected on that - I also take you point about secondary people having been deceived - I place myself in that category - the trick is to be able to evaluate new evidence, regroup and work with what has a solid basis.
The easy way for me to work out who is a bad person is to see whether they publicly attack (threaten, post false or defamatory statements, attempt to doxx) me. I don't consider criticism of my work to be an attack. Making false statements about what I have said is the worst though because it sets one up for targeting and intimidation from other people. This is what Latypova and Ruby do deliberately. Mike (and a number of others in their circle) are affiliating themselves with those people but ignore the fact that they lied about someone. That is a major deal breaker. If you for instance posted a lie about what Mike Yeadon said in these comments I would delete it and likely ban you. It is not OK, whatever you think of those people.
They have to use these methods to discredit us and people should really be asking why they would do it. Mike may unfortunately find that my sympathies to his plight, if indeed he is a victim, are limited whilst he reposts hit pieces about me which are intended to threaten and intimidate not just me but other whistleblowers or scientists who dare to say something.
You have such an incredible talent in 1)spotting the pattern that alerts you that something needs to be addressed and 2)thoroughly and expertly describing what is going on. Through your incredible posts we have learned to apply these blueprint patterns against a bigger backdrop.
1)There are multiple people like Bill Gates who regularly complete this cycle a)fund a controversial problem b)alert the government to the “problem” they created c)create a “solution” through a product d)sell the product to the government e)sell the solution to someone else when it doesn’t work and then f)start with a new controversial problem
2)Well-poisoning. We are aware of Jane Ruby, Latypova and now Yeadon. You can also apply this Candace Owens. She has her followers focused on Egyptian planes and people at TPUSA for the murder of Kirk.- easily debunked. That is a distraction from the fact someone IS grooming trans people online to commit serious crimes. Zizians and all of the trans extremists (like school shootings, attempt on Supreme Court justice, etc). that Andy Ngo follows.
Love, love love your posts. Always eye opening! Thank you!
Totally agree. I don't know what happened to Candace Owens but I agree that the whole "everything that is wrong is a Jewish conspiracy" is another of these AJ-style LARPs. It is IMO intended to distract from the fact that the world's intel agencies have got so full of themselves that they think they can run the world and be police, judge and executioner - and they will never be accountable. If you were going to give someone that amount of power does anyone think it can end in anything good?
I think JFK got it right and this short document is worth of reading:
With this prescient quote from Schlesinger:
"efforts to enforce secrecy in such situations (as through official misrepresentation, suppression of news, etc.) will, if successful, run counter to our whole national ethos, and in the long run will have a corrupting effect on the character of our society"
That is what created COVID and the biomedical media.
The problem is that it took with it a satanic and fascistic ethos and people like Latypova and the Boston Consulting Group are just the tip of the iceberg. The US government is infested with these self-styled gods. Nothing pleases them more of course than distracting you with "it's Israel's fault" which is the new McCarthyism and a very insidious version of "look over there not here".
I think Candace was always unstable - she came from the left and then moved far to the right and for some time along the way she was saying things that aligned with sensible libertarian views distrustful of authority etc. At this point I think she's just playing to her audience and saying anything that maximizes her clicks/views, and unfortunately there's a huge audience for "the Jews control the world" conspiracy which she's playing to.
Ark, impeccable, credible, incredible work as always. Every evil layer you expose shows ever-more-conclusively pharma’s putrid operating system…companies whose mythologies have so long been worshiped as The Science™️. I am left to surmise this level of evil did not emerge over time, but was baked right into the cake of these companies’ “business models.” Hell anxiously awaits such sociopaths who have lied to and duped people in their most vulnerable moments…all in order to sell “product.”
I think the guide for this is - if someone makes a claim is it: (1) credible (i.e. does it seem to go over the top?) and (2) is it verifiable (that is, does the reference chain stack up)
Sometimes these people make the claims without references (e.g. Mike re ivermectin on delingpod) and video is particularly susceptible to this, so I try to avoid it - if I have to watch a video I ask where the document version is so that I can check it out in a fraction of the time it takes to watch a video)
The syncytin/mNeonGreen bullshit was particularly insidious because Yodarg/Yeadon produced a document with references that appeared to be kosher, but they knew that they weren’t. It was a deep con. Awful.
I learned from an inspector general of a major government agency there are three kinds of whistleblowers:
~The first has documentary evidence and provides it anonymously. This is the most believable as there is likely no personal stake other than not getting caught.
~The second is a witness, has an excellent work record, but has to give verbal testimony on what they know. This is the next believable because they are also personally at risk.
~The third has to give verbal testimony, but doesn't have a good reputation and may be using it to get some advantage such as witness protection to keep from being fired.
I apply this generally to any provider of information: what do they have to gain, are they known to speak the truth, is it hard evidence?
There are people I've followed for years who have proven their information. They correct it on the rare occasion they were wrong and update it when they have better information. When the information is not firm, they say so. Knowing the jab was EUA and not fully tested, I did a lot of research in addition to their information as the fear porn initially afftected me. It was clear from online studies that there was a conspiracy, for studies that indicated some sort of issue with mRNA jabs would have a statement at the end that dispite this result take the jab. It was clear they added this to get published.
I find it difficult to believe that those opposing the jab were supporting pHARMa or are dual agents. If so, they were wildly successful and pHARMa has a suicide complex. I have followed Alex Jones and, frankly, he is right more often than wrong. Of course he uses inflammatory rhetoric, but he does provide the data he bases his statements on. Like all news, one can take it as gospel or see it may be indicative of a trend he is reporting and check it futher.
I think this is a very structured way of looking at things. Having been in this ridiculous situation since 2020 of having to hide behind an avatar I accept that I can only provide data and show people how to connect dots. I know that there are people that want to "out" people like me and they are doing it for the purpose of silencing us. Those people definitively (as per their recent posts) include Latypova, Ruby and more recently Yeadon. There is no reason to do this other than to stop me posting, hoping that if they name a doctor associated with me they will get that doctor deregistered and if it's the wrong person it doesn't matter they'll just move on to the next candidate.
That is not the action of a genuine whistleblower. It is the action of a phintel operative. I don't differentiate pharma from the intel agencies because I have good evidence from what has happened to me that one protects the other, irrespective of whether each has "good people" working for them. The medical industry also has "good people" but as you can see just from the fact that we are having this conversation on an avatar account the good people are not allowed to speak up, or they will be deregistered. This happened during Vioxx, thalidomide and COVID and it will keep happening until the people who do this (target doctors, like Latypova has done and the Vioxx actors before her did) are in jail. If that never happens then you will never get safe drugs because the people who would say something will say nothing.
That was why they took out Andrew Wakefield and William McBride. If you don't know the second name, you need to.
I very well understand the reason for anonymity. I was an anonymous whistleblower twice, once during a Republican and once during a Democrat administration. A whistle blower is simply one who exposes a truth. Those who are hiding it know exposing it will damage them so they invariably attack the whistle blower.
Generally in business or government, whistle blowing involves a rule or law being broken. Where information is less certain or evolving, as in science, evidence or questions that may disrupt certain goals will also result in attacks.
I have been skeptical of MY and AJ for some time. Things just didn't add up, even when I agreed with what they were saying. At one point I even thought there were two M.Y's! (With opposing views) Your article was well written and easy to follow, even for this Yaahoo. Totally cleared up some fuzziness i had been seeing. Reminds me of the saying, "satan will tell you 9 truths to get you to believe the 1 lie" . Evil is alive and well that is for certain.
I absolutely agree that you need to understand the spiritual aspect of this in order to understand the intent. Thank you for your supportive comment as I know these articles require a lot of concentration and although I want to make them shorter the length of this article really represents the complexity of the LARP. They are very clever (cunning) people.
Exactly. I forgot to include the reference to Mockingbird media but those paying attention probably already realise. Their "Mockingbird research group" is registered on a road called "Mockingbird loop" in Louisiana and so they can claim that that is the reason for the name. A lot of this military intel activity plays on dual meanings and it is how they mock the proletariat (see all of @thewayout substack).
If you street view the business address you will see it is a poorly kept country residential property and at one point harboured a USMC flag. I used to think the USMC were honourable people and I know many of them are, but the institution is now IMO as corrupt as all the others. If they want to prove me wrong perhaps they can start doing the job they were meant to and have a think about whether they are serving the US government or the US people.
Yes I'm genuinely sorry about that but he decided to repost a hit piece on me which was awful. Rather than retaliate I thought it important to let people decide for themselves which side these people are on.
Let me know if you think there is anything incorrect
I think Yeadon is a mixed bag with mostly good intentions (by primarily warning against the jabs) but exhibiting fear-based spontaneously erratic conclusions. By not retracting wild assertions, he’s boxed himself in, possibly without realizing it.
Regarding his “poisoned well” arguments, should we consider it purely coincidental that many birth rate data trends (in highly COVID mRNA Vaxxed countries) are showing marked declines? Alternatively, what might you ascribe those trends to? IE transfection or spike damage?
Great question and a complex answer because there are so many contributors. You can't deny a pre-existing decline in birth rates and although 2021 was a bump it would be expected to drop again. There is highly likely to be a drop in fertility related to the COVID vaccine rollout based on what I have seen but no independent data has emerged to verify.
Yeadon's claim was a specific one and it would more likely cause miscarriage not infertility. The miscarriage spike we have calculated in relation to the COVID vaccines are temporal (near the time of the vaccination), which would count against the claim.
Hi Arkmedic, To answer your questions, - I have no relationship with Mike Yeadon or his team.
However as I said, I live in the UK, and realised the "covid emergency" was fake from the very outset, because I have a background in the relevant issues. So I know exactly how events developed in this country and clearly remember what was happening when Mike first spoke out and came to public notice.
Mike wrote several detailed articles for a website I used to follow events in the early days - Lockdown sceptics.
E.g.- Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives by Dr Mike Yeadon 20 September 2020
He was one of the very few voices that were brave enough to try to correct our governments destructive fearmongering. And he did this VERY EARLY and was most effective in blocking the deadly propaganda of this carefully planned and criminal military operation. He had some personal knowledge of the people in government who were running the propaganda campaign. At the time the underlying issues were not clear, so we were all working in the dark. He was outstanding in his ability to encapsulate the vital points clearly. I have watched and followed him over the past five years. Mike is well known. He has done nothing to merit the silly suspicions you spread on your site. As a fellow Englishman I can assess his character better than someone can who is from a different culture and lives in a different country.
He saved many lives in my country by doing this loudly and promptly - as the level of trust in government is high in the UK and most people were deceived.
I fully support his and Latypova's legal case in the Netherlands. This is the tenth (10th) attempt to bring these matters to court.
Endless discussion of scientific and medical minutiae is a diversionary tactic to distract from the need for political action at this stage.
I do not agree with Mike Yeadon in his no-virus stance, but my opinion is that this discussion is immaterial to the larger issues and the legal questions will not be affected.
The one pathology that is irrefutable, is the finding of amyloid clotting in those exposed to this agent/virus/toxin. The fact that this new pathology exists proves that "covid" is not "rebranded flu." However, this does not prove that "covid" must be a naturally spreading virus. It could equally well be a toxin that has been artificially targeted at certain populations. I see the virus/no virus debate to be a deliberate psyop to distract from these matters, but I do not see Yeadon as knowingly promoting a psyop, I believe him to be genuinely mistaken on a subsidiary point, one that can be disregarded as not central to the real issues.
Your criticisms of Mike appear confused and unnecessary. Given his bravery, and the personal sacrifice he has made to speak out he deserves better treatment from you.
You have done extremely good articles in the past mate and I've learnt a lot of you and others But no one should be helping the government reframe this technology to vaccine. By doing so the technology has the automatic positivity of the mass belief in the vaccine religion.
In reality I believe we all shouldn't even call it a genetic therapy because this piggybacks the positive anchored emotional responses to the word therapy.
When reaching the important people (tv drone masses) I always refer to it as a potential genetic editing drug or technology because even the dumbest is cautious about that.
All good mate, my answer to your question was the response as well. The how was set up decades ago with the anchoring of emotional responses to key terms and both sides of the emotional divide. Whether it was the anchoring the emotions of love/safety/caring/responsiblity to vaccine or the opposite to "antivaxxer".
All mammals are emotionally driven otherwise the sales industry wouldn't have gotten of the ground. This is how they did it and the sage hana author has done some good articles with links to old videos of "their" plans. If you have the time I certainly recommend "Two world wars and Hitler" by Dr Jim MacGregor and Dr John O'Dowd because my two cents it's all tied together and the eugenics programs are alive and well.
Not being a prick but I would have thought the lps would be a bigger concern then the peg but I'm not qualified to have an opinion anyway.
Thanks for the response though it shows good manners especially with an unknown such as myself. The depths of evil the empties are capable of is really without limit and whether there is a god or satan is irrelevant when there are extraordinarily powerful families that do believe in the ideals of such an entity or act in a manner that such a being would express.
You can do this in informal chats no problem, if that's what you think. But you can't do it in legal jurisidictions and be taken seriously.
It's like going into court and talking about chemtrails. Sure, there may be some evidence behind your contention but the threshold for proof in a court, where the default is very much whatever is published in the mainstream media, is very high. If you make such a contention in a court (unless you have done some deep scientific forensics and are an expert in the field) you will be eviscerated. In addition a court case relies on the credibility of all the witnesses for one side. If you bring a person along making crazy claims and claiming they are the Queen of England (essentially what the Dutch case "bioweapons experts" [sic] are doing) it will derail the case.
Sigh. You almost lost me at the invocation of millions of years of evolution to account for the development of syncytin-1 from a retrovirus. How about the possibility that the similarities are accounted for under a ‘common-designer’ paradigm, mixed with the destructive capabilities of a ‘fallen world’. A ‘fallen world’ paradigm that aligns completely with the rest of your thesis. Instead, I see the regurgitation of more ScienceTM ‘just-so’ stories that can never be robustly substantiated with any measure of observable, repeatable data sets.
That being said, the logic presented is pretty compelling- even if my head does hurt a little! 😇
Yes you're right. I had actually missed that and not considered that possibility but it is a great point.
The articles are intended to use the available science to make the case rather than to add the extra complexity of the theological contribution to nature and/or the unexplained. I will leave that for people who are more qualified in that area than me, but appreciate the nudge.
Wow, this is a lot to consume. I believe this is the first time I’ve read you. I will read it again and follow the links. I wouldn’t have been exposed to any of this had I not been pfizer covid shot injured. This period of time has really opened my eyes to the vast depth of corruption in the “medical” field. I had an inkling but disappointingly, I was taken in by the 24/7 fear mongering. I feel so scared and anxious about telling my then pregnant daughter in law to make sure she got the shot whilst pregnant. The constant fear pumped out that if pregnant women didn’t get the shot , their babies could be stillborn(which I have personal experience from years ago), or their babies could get multi inflammatory syndrome. My granddaughter was born but I noticed that she’s been behind the curve in walking, talking and repetitive behaviours. I feel so guilty that I opened my mouth.
I follow Jessica Rose, Kevin McKernan, Maryanne Demasi and the Old Geezers Carl Hanaghan and Tom Jefferson. For whatever reason I did not feel comfortable with Yeadon and didn’t care to listen to him further after the first time. Hindsight is 20/20 but I am so angry at myself for naively believing health Canada’s regulatory agency who claimed save and effective based on no evidence. The propaganda was pumped out to prime us not to believe the anti vaxxer scientists who had concerns. The reassurance that the shots were safe because they’d been working on the mRNA technology for decades which after the fact begs the question as to why it wasn’t brought to market at an earlier time.
I was shocked that there was no active, independent data collection implemented to look for signals on a technology never tried on humans before. Shocked that shot injuries were silenced, unacknowledged with no medical help or the heads up to doctors despite the “we are all in this together” lie. To this day suspiciously there is no diagnostic test, the onus is on the injured to prove causation. The statistics are flawed and come out as another lie to pull the wool over the public’s and doctor’s eyes.
The wealth and power have the financial means to suppress the truth, which is really scary, as well as the hoards of people who still believe in the system that propagated the lies.
It seems to me that you have an excellent sense of discernment
Hi Vivien, thank you for sharing. What you describe here was felt regardless of which "side" phintel categorised you in their great fake divide. It was impossible to share concerns of any persuasion except the one pre-determined outcome. Never felt so "used". Understanding these methods of persuasion is why am still here 6 years later. https://feesgarden.substack.com/p/the-widow-maker-that-never-lies
Sorry to hear of your circumstances. I know of so many others who've suffered damage.
One extended family member has visual damage.
Another with amyloidosis, another with cancer.
Others with AI or attenuated immunity.
Many former colleagues are sick - cancer, AI, etc.
No non-vaxxed family members have been presenting with illness in the same period.
You need to calm.down. have a timeout
Yeah, the only problem with that advice is I didn’t use social media. I only became a social media addict after the shot injury.
I am sorry to hear you have been injured. In the UK, Mike saved many people from a similar fate. Please do not believe the lies you are told about him, I remember his actions at the time, early, before the vaccines (so called) were even available. He acted in good faith and put himself at risk to do this. The really shocking thing for me, was how few professional men had the courage and probity to support him.
Wowsers. This does sound like well-poisoning-age akin to the latypova-ing we've all been subjected to.
Yes it's totally related. I actually think Yeadon could be a victim of their grooming scam. Latypova definitely isn't.
I subscribed to Latypova for a week or so before I regretted that decision and unsubscribed. Yikes!
I thankfully had a lifelong interest in health and nutrition and knew what pharma was all about long before 2020. That along with the government pushing the shots 24/7…. something is up and it’s definitely not in my best interest. Best decision ever made and if I had to forgo a winter vacation so be it (the unvaccinated were essentially locked in Canada for 18 months unable to travel).
Latypova smells like CIA.
Yep
Rather Putin and @jikkyleaks
Oh Hi Norman.
Is Sasha Latypova one of your people then?
I'd like to know which arm of the intel agencies is coordinating you all - did they do the thing where they ask if you're a patriot at the same time as showing you clips of kompromat on you?
Rubbish Jessica Rose! Read Mikes statements at the time, in my comment below. Shame on you.
Nah, I don't think we will listen to somebody that says viruses are fake, hiroshima's fake, & ivm causes mass infertility. Thanks.
My point is that Mike is acting in good faith. Not that he is correct in all his beliefs.
The comments here attribute motives to him that are wrong and reprehensible. All proper political or scientific discussion has to contend with disagreement. I am much more suspicious of those who would enforce a false consensus, and those silly enough to want this.
Mike has also moved to taking legal and political action, as is necessary if we are to free ourselves.. Why do you trust those who want to fritter away your energy and time in endless discussion of pointless scientific minutiae?
Tremendous work. Thank you.
Thank you very much for the time and effort connecting all of these complicated dots for our benefit. I remember watching a few videos early on by Mike Yeadon and yes, the “ex-Pfizer VP” title was a successful hook there at least initially. Over time, however, I found myself backing away. Same thing happened with Sasha Latypova. You get initially drawn in by their supposed credentials in a field where you have none, but over time, some underlying quality of their message clangs a discordant note that you can’t quite explain, but feel compelled to move on. I read this article in part because, in addition to Mike Yeadon, I remember seeing Wolfgang Wodarg in some videos as a member of Reiner Fuellmich’s “Coronavirus Investigative Committee.” And we all know how that ended up playing out for Mr. Fuellmich. So to learn that Yeadon and Wodarg ended up joining forces in this endeavor was very interesting and illustrative to me. The sheer scale of the manipulation that goes on ultimately may be what makes it so hard for the population at large to accept. It’s an overwhelming and disheartening notion. It reminds me of the saying “once a mind is expanded by an idea, it can’t return to its original shape.” Once you wake up to all of these shenanigans going on behind the scenes, you can’t go back to blissful ignorance and also have a challenging time interacting with those who choose to remain there.
Wow, you were very articulate giving my exact opinion! Especially, “drawn in by their credentials because you have none". Yes, but our God given discernment thankfully kicked in!
Watching Latypova latch onto that Dutch case winding its way through the courts was SO painful. She will ruin it for certain!
Which is exactly the intent. And when our mice friends exposed that, that's when she doubled her efforts to come after us - resulting in that ridiculous hit piece at Christmas on her substack.
It is of course an interesting supposition that her substack supposedly has over 1000 paid subscribers. For what? Repeating tired old messages about operation warp speed being a military operation so don't even bother to sue the government or call for accountability?
We are really expected to believe that in the day and age when many of the people affected by the biomedical mafia were terminated from employment or went bankrupt that thousands of them are willing to pay for her junk? Not a chance. As twitter's #sashagate episode showed most of her following is based on bots and fake accounts, which, the assumption can only be, are provided by those people (institutions) that have access to them - almost certainly funded by your tax dollars.
:-D Familiar story to my own.
I have to admit to being taken in by Mike, back in 2021 - he seemed to saying the right things. If I'd paid attention to him for longer, I suspect Id've seen some things that raised an eyebrow. (I recently saw some garbage that raised both eyebrows.).
I have Jikky to thank for pointing me at the Ziarco thing and, as a consequence, have become more discerning. Some of the other people offering comment were easier to write off. (Jane Ruby, Sasha Latypova, Brian Ardiss, The Bayleys, the 5G conflationists, the self-ordered nano-machines proponents.).
The most useful lesson in this saga has been that background checks are mandatory. Where there is a lot of money, there will be someone who loves it...and we all know where that leads. What a thing it is to finally (begin to) understand how pharma, intel, health, and other aedificia ordinis novi exist hand in glove with each other - assuming, of course, you can even see the hand;-)
Thanks Chris I think that is the way to look at it. Unfortunately there are so many people who don't trust the government (rightly) who at the same time find it too easy to trust people who make claims that sound anti-government.
It's a fantastic lesson to learn and it can be very difficult to discern those who were themselves taken in (Ardis might fit into this category) against those who are pulling the strings (that would be Sasha Latypova and Jane Ruby). I actually have no idea which category Mike fits into but his substacks (and the weird Lioness of Judah that he is affiliated with) have continued to bash people like Jessica Rose who I value as a friend and colleague. They also bash Robert Malone relentlessly and a pattern therefore emerges when they spend more time bashing people who are working to expose pharma safety than the people that are responsible.
Brian might be genuine. My contention is one of diminishing returns (the spike is toxic - would cistronic sequences from 20+ critters really have been isolated and spliced into the SARS-CoV-2 genome?) and I am willing to stand corrected on that - I also take you point about secondary people having been deceived - I place myself in that category - the trick is to be able to evaluate new evidence, regroup and work with what has a solid basis.
The easy way for me to work out who is a bad person is to see whether they publicly attack (threaten, post false or defamatory statements, attempt to doxx) me. I don't consider criticism of my work to be an attack. Making false statements about what I have said is the worst though because it sets one up for targeting and intimidation from other people. This is what Latypova and Ruby do deliberately. Mike (and a number of others in their circle) are affiliating themselves with those people but ignore the fact that they lied about someone. That is a major deal breaker. If you for instance posted a lie about what Mike Yeadon said in these comments I would delete it and likely ban you. It is not OK, whatever you think of those people.
They have to use these methods to discredit us and people should really be asking why they would do it. Mike may unfortunately find that my sympathies to his plight, if indeed he is a victim, are limited whilst he reposts hit pieces about me which are intended to threaten and intimidate not just me but other whistleblowers or scientists who dare to say something.
That is an eminently fair and sensible position.
Logically fallacious arguments are always a fed flag, as is defamation...and nice junkets and huge bonuses.
OB MD's took advantage of "trust"...there are a few good nurses who communicated truth to patients once they enter the hospital industrial complex.
You have such an incredible talent in 1)spotting the pattern that alerts you that something needs to be addressed and 2)thoroughly and expertly describing what is going on. Through your incredible posts we have learned to apply these blueprint patterns against a bigger backdrop.
1)There are multiple people like Bill Gates who regularly complete this cycle a)fund a controversial problem b)alert the government to the “problem” they created c)create a “solution” through a product d)sell the product to the government e)sell the solution to someone else when it doesn’t work and then f)start with a new controversial problem
2)Well-poisoning. We are aware of Jane Ruby, Latypova and now Yeadon. You can also apply this Candace Owens. She has her followers focused on Egyptian planes and people at TPUSA for the murder of Kirk.- easily debunked. That is a distraction from the fact someone IS grooming trans people online to commit serious crimes. Zizians and all of the trans extremists (like school shootings, attempt on Supreme Court justice, etc). that Andy Ngo follows.
Love, love love your posts. Always eye opening! Thank you!
Totally agree. I don't know what happened to Candace Owens but I agree that the whole "everything that is wrong is a Jewish conspiracy" is another of these AJ-style LARPs. It is IMO intended to distract from the fact that the world's intel agencies have got so full of themselves that they think they can run the world and be police, judge and executioner - and they will never be accountable. If you were going to give someone that amount of power does anyone think it can end in anything good?
I think JFK got it right and this short document is worth of reading:
With this prescient quote from Schlesinger:
"efforts to enforce secrecy in such situations (as through official misrepresentation, suppression of news, etc.) will, if successful, run counter to our whole national ethos, and in the long run will have a corrupting effect on the character of our society"
https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/2025-03/2025-03-27_responsiblestatecraft.org-jfk_wanted_to_splinter_cia_into_a_thousand_pieces_why_didnt_he.pdf
That is what created COVID and the biomedical media.
The problem is that it took with it a satanic and fascistic ethos and people like Latypova and the Boston Consulting Group are just the tip of the iceberg. The US government is infested with these self-styled gods. Nothing pleases them more of course than distracting you with "it's Israel's fault" which is the new McCarthyism and a very insidious version of "look over there not here".
I think Candace was always unstable - she came from the left and then moved far to the right and for some time along the way she was saying things that aligned with sensible libertarian views distrustful of authority etc. At this point I think she's just playing to her audience and saying anything that maximizes her clicks/views, and unfortunately there's a huge audience for "the Jews control the world" conspiracy which she's playing to.
Ark, impeccable, credible, incredible work as always. Every evil layer you expose shows ever-more-conclusively pharma’s putrid operating system…companies whose mythologies have so long been worshiped as The Science™️. I am left to surmise this level of evil did not emerge over time, but was baked right into the cake of these companies’ “business models.” Hell anxiously awaits such sociopaths who have lied to and duped people in their most vulnerable moments…all in order to sell “product.”
Thank you for the effort - good to read all this packed in one.
There are fewer and fewer we can trust. Thank you for this arkmedic!
I think the guide for this is - if someone makes a claim is it: (1) credible (i.e. does it seem to go over the top?) and (2) is it verifiable (that is, does the reference chain stack up)
Sometimes these people make the claims without references (e.g. Mike re ivermectin on delingpod) and video is particularly susceptible to this, so I try to avoid it - if I have to watch a video I ask where the document version is so that I can check it out in a fraction of the time it takes to watch a video)
The syncytin/mNeonGreen bullshit was particularly insidious because Yodarg/Yeadon produced a document with references that appeared to be kosher, but they knew that they weren’t. It was a deep con. Awful.
I learned from an inspector general of a major government agency there are three kinds of whistleblowers:
~The first has documentary evidence and provides it anonymously. This is the most believable as there is likely no personal stake other than not getting caught.
~The second is a witness, has an excellent work record, but has to give verbal testimony on what they know. This is the next believable because they are also personally at risk.
~The third has to give verbal testimony, but doesn't have a good reputation and may be using it to get some advantage such as witness protection to keep from being fired.
I apply this generally to any provider of information: what do they have to gain, are they known to speak the truth, is it hard evidence?
There are people I've followed for years who have proven their information. They correct it on the rare occasion they were wrong and update it when they have better information. When the information is not firm, they say so. Knowing the jab was EUA and not fully tested, I did a lot of research in addition to their information as the fear porn initially afftected me. It was clear from online studies that there was a conspiracy, for studies that indicated some sort of issue with mRNA jabs would have a statement at the end that dispite this result take the jab. It was clear they added this to get published.
I find it difficult to believe that those opposing the jab were supporting pHARMa or are dual agents. If so, they were wildly successful and pHARMa has a suicide complex. I have followed Alex Jones and, frankly, he is right more often than wrong. Of course he uses inflammatory rhetoric, but he does provide the data he bases his statements on. Like all news, one can take it as gospel or see it may be indicative of a trend he is reporting and check it futher.
I think this is a very structured way of looking at things. Having been in this ridiculous situation since 2020 of having to hide behind an avatar I accept that I can only provide data and show people how to connect dots. I know that there are people that want to "out" people like me and they are doing it for the purpose of silencing us. Those people definitively (as per their recent posts) include Latypova, Ruby and more recently Yeadon. There is no reason to do this other than to stop me posting, hoping that if they name a doctor associated with me they will get that doctor deregistered and if it's the wrong person it doesn't matter they'll just move on to the next candidate.
That is not the action of a genuine whistleblower. It is the action of a phintel operative. I don't differentiate pharma from the intel agencies because I have good evidence from what has happened to me that one protects the other, irrespective of whether each has "good people" working for them. The medical industry also has "good people" but as you can see just from the fact that we are having this conversation on an avatar account the good people are not allowed to speak up, or they will be deregistered. This happened during Vioxx, thalidomide and COVID and it will keep happening until the people who do this (target doctors, like Latypova has done and the Vioxx actors before her did) are in jail. If that never happens then you will never get safe drugs because the people who would say something will say nothing.
That was why they took out Andrew Wakefield and William McBride. If you don't know the second name, you need to.
I very well understand the reason for anonymity. I was an anonymous whistleblower twice, once during a Republican and once during a Democrat administration. A whistle blower is simply one who exposes a truth. Those who are hiding it know exposing it will damage them so they invariably attack the whistle blower.
Generally in business or government, whistle blowing involves a rule or law being broken. Where information is less certain or evolving, as in science, evidence or questions that may disrupt certain goals will also result in attacks.
Holy moly! Thank you! You delivered the goods!
I have been skeptical of MY and AJ for some time. Things just didn't add up, even when I agreed with what they were saying. At one point I even thought there were two M.Y's! (With opposing views) Your article was well written and easy to follow, even for this Yaahoo. Totally cleared up some fuzziness i had been seeing. Reminds me of the saying, "satan will tell you 9 truths to get you to believe the 1 lie" . Evil is alive and well that is for certain.
God bless you Dr. Ah Kahn Syed!!!
I absolutely agree that you need to understand the spiritual aspect of this in order to understand the intent. Thank you for your supportive comment as I know these articles require a lot of concentration and although I want to make them shorter the length of this article really represents the complexity of the LARP. They are very clever (cunning) people.
Gallagher and his son wearing, “Mockingbird Nature,” shirts. What is that?
Exactly. I forgot to include the reference to Mockingbird media but those paying attention probably already realise. Their "Mockingbird research group" is registered on a road called "Mockingbird loop" in Louisiana and so they can claim that that is the reason for the name. A lot of this military intel activity plays on dual meanings and it is how they mock the proletariat (see all of @thewayout substack).
If you street view the business address you will see it is a poorly kept country residential property and at one point harboured a USMC flag. I used to think the USMC were honourable people and I know many of them are, but the institution is now IMO as corrupt as all the others. If they want to prove me wrong perhaps they can start doing the job they were meant to and have a think about whether they are serving the US government or the US people.
Wow, this is quite a lot to digest, especially with regard to Dr Michael Yeadon.
Yes I'm genuinely sorry about that but he decided to repost a hit piece on me which was awful. Rather than retaliate I thought it important to let people decide for themselves which side these people are on.
Let me know if you think there is anything incorrect
I think Yeadon is a mixed bag with mostly good intentions (by primarily warning against the jabs) but exhibiting fear-based spontaneously erratic conclusions. By not retracting wild assertions, he’s boxed himself in, possibly without realizing it.
Regarding his “poisoned well” arguments, should we consider it purely coincidental that many birth rate data trends (in highly COVID mRNA Vaxxed countries) are showing marked declines? Alternatively, what might you ascribe those trends to? IE transfection or spike damage?
Great question and a complex answer because there are so many contributors. You can't deny a pre-existing decline in birth rates and although 2021 was a bump it would be expected to drop again. There is highly likely to be a drop in fertility related to the COVID vaccine rollout based on what I have seen but no independent data has emerged to verify.
Yeadon's claim was a specific one and it would more likely cause miscarriage not infertility. The miscarriage spike we have calculated in relation to the COVID vaccines are temporal (near the time of the vaccination), which would count against the claim.
"Let me know if you think there is anything incorrect"
Just about everything.🤢 You must be off your head.
What relationship do you have with Mike Yeeadon Tim West and the Lioness of Judah substack?
Hi Arkmedic, To answer your questions, - I have no relationship with Mike Yeadon or his team.
However as I said, I live in the UK, and realised the "covid emergency" was fake from the very outset, because I have a background in the relevant issues. So I know exactly how events developed in this country and clearly remember what was happening when Mike first spoke out and came to public notice.
Mike wrote several detailed articles for a website I used to follow events in the early days - Lockdown sceptics.
E.g.- Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives by Dr Mike Yeadon 20 September 2020
https://lockdownsceptics.org/index.php?p=13340
He was one of the very few voices that were brave enough to try to correct our governments destructive fearmongering. And he did this VERY EARLY and was most effective in blocking the deadly propaganda of this carefully planned and criminal military operation. He had some personal knowledge of the people in government who were running the propaganda campaign. At the time the underlying issues were not clear, so we were all working in the dark. He was outstanding in his ability to encapsulate the vital points clearly. I have watched and followed him over the past five years. Mike is well known. He has done nothing to merit the silly suspicions you spread on your site. As a fellow Englishman I can assess his character better than someone can who is from a different culture and lives in a different country.
He saved many lives in my country by doing this loudly and promptly - as the level of trust in government is high in the UK and most people were deceived.
I fully support his and Latypova's legal case in the Netherlands. This is the tenth (10th) attempt to bring these matters to court.
Endless discussion of scientific and medical minutiae is a diversionary tactic to distract from the need for political action at this stage.
I do not agree with Mike Yeadon in his no-virus stance, but my opinion is that this discussion is immaterial to the larger issues and the legal questions will not be affected.
The one pathology that is irrefutable, is the finding of amyloid clotting in those exposed to this agent/virus/toxin. The fact that this new pathology exists proves that "covid" is not "rebranded flu." However, this does not prove that "covid" must be a naturally spreading virus. It could equally well be a toxin that has been artificially targeted at certain populations. I see the virus/no virus debate to be a deliberate psyop to distract from these matters, but I do not see Yeadon as knowingly promoting a psyop, I believe him to be genuinely mistaken on a subsidiary point, one that can be disregarded as not central to the real issues.
Your criticisms of Mike appear confused and unnecessary. Given his bravery, and the personal sacrifice he has made to speak out he deserves better treatment from you.
Can you list the team members of his team so I can understand who is involved in this?
What are you talking about?
I'll check back later. If you choose to keep this comment up I will fix it along with your other spam posts.
You have done extremely good articles in the past mate and I've learnt a lot of you and others But no one should be helping the government reframe this technology to vaccine. By doing so the technology has the automatic positivity of the mass belief in the vaccine religion.
In reality I believe we all shouldn't even call it a genetic therapy because this piggybacks the positive anchored emotional responses to the word therapy.
When reaching the important people (tv drone masses) I always refer to it as a potential genetic editing drug or technology because even the dumbest is cautious about that.
It's a fair point but we each need to be allowed to use the terms we are comfortable with for reasons that may not be obvious to the audience.
All good mate, my answer to your question was the response as well. The how was set up decades ago with the anchoring of emotional responses to key terms and both sides of the emotional divide. Whether it was the anchoring the emotions of love/safety/caring/responsiblity to vaccine or the opposite to "antivaxxer".
All mammals are emotionally driven otherwise the sales industry wouldn't have gotten of the ground. This is how they did it and the sage hana author has done some good articles with links to old videos of "their" plans. If you have the time I certainly recommend "Two world wars and Hitler" by Dr Jim MacGregor and Dr John O'Dowd because my two cents it's all tied together and the eugenics programs are alive and well.
Not being a prick but I would have thought the lps would be a bigger concern then the peg but I'm not qualified to have an opinion anyway.
Thanks for the response though it shows good manners especially with an unknown such as myself. The depths of evil the empties are capable of is really without limit and whether there is a god or satan is irrelevant when there are extraordinarily powerful families that do believe in the ideals of such an entity or act in a manner that such a being would express.
How about referring to it as a 'bioweapon'. The world governments are all in on this. Democide = death by gov't. In God we Trust ...
You can do this in informal chats no problem, if that's what you think. But you can't do it in legal jurisidictions and be taken seriously.
It's like going into court and talking about chemtrails. Sure, there may be some evidence behind your contention but the threshold for proof in a court, where the default is very much whatever is published in the mainstream media, is very high. If you make such a contention in a court (unless you have done some deep scientific forensics and are an expert in the field) you will be eviscerated. In addition a court case relies on the credibility of all the witnesses for one side. If you bring a person along making crazy claims and claiming they are the Queen of England (essentially what the Dutch case "bioweapons experts" [sic] are doing) it will derail the case.
100%!!!
Sigh. You almost lost me at the invocation of millions of years of evolution to account for the development of syncytin-1 from a retrovirus. How about the possibility that the similarities are accounted for under a ‘common-designer’ paradigm, mixed with the destructive capabilities of a ‘fallen world’. A ‘fallen world’ paradigm that aligns completely with the rest of your thesis. Instead, I see the regurgitation of more ScienceTM ‘just-so’ stories that can never be robustly substantiated with any measure of observable, repeatable data sets.
That being said, the logic presented is pretty compelling- even if my head does hurt a little! 😇
Yes you're right. I had actually missed that and not considered that possibility but it is a great point.
The articles are intended to use the available science to make the case rather than to add the extra complexity of the theological contribution to nature and/or the unexplained. I will leave that for people who are more qualified in that area than me, but appreciate the nudge.