149 Comments

Great substack as always. This was definitely Shipman, but Shipman unintentionally via Pharma in my view. What is the difference in treatment protocols between vaxxed and not vaxxed that the average GP might refer to and follow when the unvaxxed covid patient calls? Per National Guidelines- https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/L4Q5An/section/LA6kkM

"6.1.4.1

Molnupiravir (Lagevrio) for adults

Conditional recommendation

Consider using nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir within 5 days of symptom onset in unvaccinated adults* with COVID-19 who do not require oxygen and who have one or more risk factors for disease progression.

Within the patient population for which nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir is conditionally recommended for use (see Additional information), decisions about the appropriateness of treatment with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir should be based on the individual’s risk of severe disease, including their age, presence of multiple risk factors, and vaccination status (including number of doses and time since last dose/ or timing of most recent infection).

* Individuals who had received one or more doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were excluded from the trial. The efficacy of nirmatrelvir pConsider using nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir within 5 days of symptom onset in unvaccinated adults* with COVID-19 who do not require oxygen and who have one or more risk factors for disease progression.

Within the patient population for which nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir is conditionally recommended for use (see Additional information), decisions about the appropriateness of treatment with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir should be based on the individual’s risk of severe disease, including their age, presence of multiple risk factors, and vaccination status (including number of doses and time since last dose/ or timing of most recent infection).

* Individuals who had received one or more doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were excluded from the trial. The efficacy of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir is unclear in individuals who have received any COVID-19 vaccine. See consensus recommendation for guidance on use of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir in vaccinated adults or in immunocompromised patients regardless of vaccination status.lus ritonavir is unclear in individuals who have received any COVID-19 vaccine. See consensus recommendation for guidance on use of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir in vaccinated adults or in immunocompromised patients regardless of vaccination status"

So the unvaxxed stood by their choice against unrelentingly propaganda and persecution. They get covid. Ringing in their ears even the strongest gonna hear the echo's of 'catch this unvaccinated you will die'. The GP does a phone consult, offers a script for Paxlovid- its even on the PBS for them. You think they would take it? I think yes. By definition these patients are not hospitalised. This finishes the job of the agenda and another covid death in unvaxxed can be triumphantly recorded, and naturally attributed to being unvaxxed and not the expensive little pills.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for this. Yes I was always very sure there is an overt or covert difference in management but I hadn't been aware that there was an actual difference in the magicapp protocol.

Great spot.

Expand full comment

Meh, not buying it. Unvaxxed, who self-selected because they are suspicious of the untested injection, are much more likely suspicious of the untested prescriptions. Generally seems the enthusiastic vax hounds are the guinea pigs more likely to request Lagevrio and Paxlovid. Unvaxxed may just be more afraid of hospitals so they stay out entirely. Only way to know is look into the records. It's only a handful, shouldn't be hard.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

As frightening as this is to contemplate, is it really any different than sending covid patients to nursing homes as was done in some States in the US, or ignoring ventilator protocols and using them early on in treatment, or banning off label use of drugs with low risk profiles that very well might have helped and not likely to hurt, or mandate an experimental gene therapy? This is not to take away the horror of what you suggest, rather to show that it well within the realm of possibility given what else they have done.

Expand full comment
author

I agree

Expand full comment

My conclusions are stay away from the medical healthcare system. And that's coming from (me) a critical care nurse that has worked in hospitals for over 25 years. I have witnessed 95+% of the people I work with go right along with anything and everything and never questioned any of it. Sure, bring charges against these criminals, but protect your health by staying out of these insane asylums. Were the majority of the employees are the ones that are insane. This is why I created a free course to help people cure their own diseases. And Yes, you can cure probably 80% of your own diseases if needed. https://TheUniversalAntidote.com

Expand full comment

I can personally testify to the efficacy of this treatment for covid - for myself, and 3 other people I recommended it to. The evidence is too strong to be attributed to coincidence!

Expand full comment

I just watched the video in the link . What a surprise, and deep sorrow to learn that again, another inexpensive and effective compound is barred from public use. He'll is always created by fellow mankind. . .

Expand full comment

Right-just like they did with Ivermectin. So disgusting.

Expand full comment

The FDA is now saying it was never banned.

Expand full comment

The town I live in hired a naturopathic doctor to treat the inmates with Covid in the county jail. He gave them Ivermectin, and they all recovered quickly. Then the inmates sued the doctor for giving them a banned medicine! The idiots at the ACLU even made a statement condemning the doctor. Luckily, the county is standing by him and has kept him on their staff. I would think that lawsuit would be dismissed now, on the grounds the FDA says it was never banned.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting this. I just recently heard about chlorine dioxide and want to investigate it more. Those books are just what I'm looking for!

Expand full comment

Putting on my PR Hat... this was a very effective way to convince billions to inject the Rat Juice.

Fear of dying from Covid is hugely motivating (you just blame the murders on Covid...)

I suspect that those who are aware that the Rat Juice is not completely safe... will still boost with the Rat Juice because they believe Covid is still far more dangerous than the Rat Juice.

This has been an extremely effective PR campaign - essentially fridges have been sold to most of the Eskimos

Expand full comment

Hi Eddy, still fighting the good fight. You were spot on 2 years ago with peak oil gone. Nice to see your still ok

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 22, 2023

It is no different, Kitsune, no different at all.

The "smoking gun" was denying access to primary care provider visits that would typically result in symptomatic treatment of respiratory symptoms with a steroid/antibiotic protocol.

The "contact prevention" excuse, used as apologia for the resulting "go home untreated and return when you cannot breathe at all, to die with us," is refuted by the everyday form of indigent care. Emergency rooms are used by the poor who have no access to primary care, with the result of...... the standard protocol prescribed, albeit at great expense, owing to hospital-based treatment overhead.

Given the denial of care model adopted concurrently with the notorious unreliability of PCR testing, I can't help wondering how many died of non-Covid respiratory infections needlessly. We can even discount the PCR misuse as a contributing factor; "public health" officials forced closure of primary care offices and forbade all symptomatic treatment outside of hospital inpatient settings.

It would be extremely difficult, but I think I might be able to understand and forgive practitioners for their suspicion of antiviral treatment, had they at least provided access to the standard protocol.

The actions of bureaucrats in California were and are particularly egregious, which is why it is now a matter of law that any physician there shall lose their license to practice if they break ranks and tell the truth as they understand it to be.

The Narrative is crumbling and fracturing, and those who imposed it are covering their tracks.

Expand full comment

And this was done world wide in countries as diverse as the US and Japan.

The fact that the narrative is falling apart does not concern them as much as one would think. They do not need to keep their crimes hidden forever. They need them hidden from most just long enough to get us all in their digital prison they are constructing for us. Once they have this up and running, it will not matter what is known by whom, any who do not comply with all they dictate will be cut off from everything and everyone.

Expand full comment

Or consider the justified anger at and distrust of not only the medical establishment but the state as such being part of the playbook of controlled destruction of the old order.

Expand full comment

Won’t matter. Those who act on that justified anger and distrust will be shut of from everything and allowed to die. This will serve as a warning to anyone else who was feeling froggy.

Expand full comment

As anyone who has seen my comments before, you’ll know I keep commenting on the UK’s T4 Programme applied to all physically, mentally and learning disabled people as well as the elderly.

None of these people received life prolonging care for Covid. Even those in hospital for other reasons also often entered into this T4 Programme. The elderly have been getting killed off in hospital for decades. I know of two personally with one waking up screaming, while they switched off the machines with relatives told he was brain dead.

This is all down to the NICE (National institute of clinical excellence) FRAILTY SCORING SYSTEM. In non Covid times the cut off for life sustaining emergency interventions is 8. During Covid, ex Health Secretary now reality TV star, and advocate for euthanasia Hancock reduced it to 5. He also ordered 2 years of Midazalam supplies that were used up in 3 months. He also reduced the age for Frailty scoring from 60 to 50.

Physical disabilities with ‘help required for heavy housework’ giving a 5!!

Plus

Age over 60 in bands. Where 75 gives a 5. With ages reduced by 10 years, 65=5

Plus

And then adding up each and every health condition whether serious, acute or chronic and including Mental health and capacity.

5= Death. FYI my score is over 10. Severe asthma attack will equal my immediate demise from the ‘death squad’ not paramedics.

Now if they can do this so easily in UK to get Covid victims to order, the same could apply to NSW for unvaccinated being deemed ‘frail’ and scoring adapted to give clinical substance to reason not treated. Like ‘confusion’ ‘delusional’ ‘personality disordered’

Ps I’ve heard of Anecdotal evidence of patient’s families saying their unvaccinated relatives were put on End of Life pathways.

Look into prescription numbers for benzodiazepines, Midazalam, Propofol, and morphine. Increases would suggest euthanasia. Compare use to previous years.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

A long comment but worth the read. Frailty at age 50?

A similar trend in systematically reducing the med system's effort to keep patients alive is observable in non-responsive patients. The current guidelines in the US define it acceptable to stop reanimation efforts on newborns after --- guess the amount of time ---- thirty seconds. That's right. You can exit the room and tell the parents, "Gosh, we're sorry, we did everything we could."

For adults who are non-responsive in a severe way, they can declare you brain dead, thus 'dead', and remove life support in a quicker time than it would take cold sores on the patient's lips to heal. Maybe I'm being optimistic here, but I presume that a major injury involving the head will take longer than some blisters on the lips to work through, and I would prefer to give people a chance.

Expand full comment

Agreed totally with this comment

I'm in UK and I was recommending my contacts in march 20 that if they had relatives in care homes,use what methods you can to take them out. What happened in them was democide

Expand full comment

Get, and carry, peppermint oil and a corticosteroid inhaler at once!

Other than "don't drive or operate dangerous machinery", midazolam (a benzodiazepine) is harmless. I gave my son and grandmother Versed™ on dental visits. However, dosis sola facit venenum. Take 50x the effective dose and you may not be able to breathe; asthma or not. Um, is propofol orally active? Also, what's with the UK using diamorphine? Heroin™ is strictly prohibited (though fairly readily available) in the US.

Expand full comment

Sorry. I do always carry peppermints, called Polos, as they work magic on the horses. And in a pinch the dogs.

I’ve improved with my asthma since moving out of property with black mould. I do carry my inhaler of budesinide. When I had Sars/-CoV-2 or whatever pneumonia, they upped the budesinide 3X normal. Plus oral steroids and doxycycline.

I feel I had divine intervention via my doctor as his protocol was effective. Had I gone to hospital I would not be here today.

Expand full comment

what do you use peppermint for?

Expand full comment

Usually, receiving morphine for pain relief is extremely difficult to be prescribed. In hospitals it always requires an assessment from a pain management expert and then it’s used with a driver. Hancock ensured there were sufficient drivers for the morphine. However, unlike normal pain management use, it was not patient controlled but by med staff. For short term home use, oromorph is prescribed.

As for propofol (a surgically used benzo) it’s always via IV by anesthetists.

Synthetic morphine slow release patches are prescribed in the UK, but again, continued use beyond short term must be assessed by pain management consultant.

Above is/was the norm. Staff in care homes rarely ever gave such drugs unless end of life care under a consultant’s continual input.

All the rules were thrown out. GPS without visiting (not allowed) care home residents were prescribed large doses of Midazalam, benzodiazepines and morphine because they claimed the patients were ‘agitated’. Meds were successful. Patients were never agitated again.

FYI I know about pain med use in UK as I have chronic pain. And I have had acute pain as I had a smashed up veterbrae embedded in the cauda equinas nerve bundle.

Expand full comment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propofol

"Propofol ... is a short-acting medication that results in a decreased level of consciousness and a lack of memory for events. ... It is given by injection into a vein." Since its effect typically lasts five to ten minutes, I suppose it isn't very orally active.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Dr. AKS... Horrifying. I fear you are correct in your analysis. The more terrifying and frustrating thing for me is that there appears to be nothing one can do to end this and hold the criminals involved accountable. "They" own it all... The media, the governments, the medical systems, the justice systems... Where is the needed intervention to bring justice to the people? Nowhere in the West.... The murderers are active and in our faces with it.... "They" remain focused on exterminating billions in service to their technofascist overlords.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I have a bit more hope with Twitter (the largest social media platform in the world (I think)) now exposing "the Files", and, largely removing the heavy censorship of the C19 truth-tellers: MDs, scientists/researchers, journalists, whistle-blowers, savvy observers, Vax-injured, family, friends for vax-dead, and unvaccinated etc... I understand it's still not exactly power to effect change, but it's got the inherent seeds to germinate a revolution. I think. I hope.

Expand full comment

There is just one way to end this and at present, the US is the only place this is still in existence. Folks down under and in NZ gave it up. We have not yet in the US but that seems to matter little as I believe the time to invoke it has long since past, but at least in theory, it still exists in the US.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I would argue that at least in the US, from which I come and with whom I have had a ten year long battle with over it forcing all non US financial institutions to spy on me and it requiring me to spy on my wife’s finances. She is Japanese and we live in Japan. I do not spy on her nor anyone else US law requires me to. Banks outside the US are non too pleased at the extraterritorial requirement to build a database of the US person account holders and report them to the US, so many just close the accounts of such. Try taking the US government to court over it and your case will never be heard as it will be dismissed for lack of standing.

My passport expires soon and for reasons related to this, I am at risk of not being able to renew it and thus my family as this will likely cause me to either return to the US for the first time in over 20 years and live as an illegal alien in Japan.

All of this is easily solvable if only enough people would care about it. The only ones who do are those who are hit by it. No one believes any of this until it happens to them. They believe the newspapers which always frame this issue as a tax evasion issue which it is not, just as they believe that the vaccine is safe and effective and that those who refuse it are evil antivaxxer scum whose very existence threatens humanity’s future.

The US government has hidden behind its constitution while it denies its protections to the people for decades, we just didn’t care enough to realize it. All it would take to right these wrongs is the will of the people to just stand up and say “No more”. I have tried for an entire decade to muster such but none care enough to even listen. If we are going to be successful, we need some way to awaken this powerful force and do it soon.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

That counter argument has been made for decades and we see where it gets people, prison.

The basis for standing is on two concepts, if the details of the case may embarrass the government or losing the case would cause them to end a money making scheme, then you do not have standing. That is not just me being glib. The bankers associations of two different States (Bet you can guess which ones.) had their lawsuit against FATCA through out for lack of standing due to the Flora rule which states that a tax, fine or fee must first be paid before a suit can be filed. However, the suit was not about the fine for not complying with FATCA , it was over the undue cost and burden of complying with the law. Yet, the judge found a way to dismiss it. If this case went to court and the gov lost, then the world wide financial surveillance system would all come crashing down, and they just can not have that, our rights be damned.

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Posts like yours are annoying. Firstly, you seem determined to take away hope, basically saying we should just take it and give up. NO! Secondly you sound like you're on a fishing expedition, hoping to get others, perhaps paid shills, to call for violence, so this author or even substack itself can be closed down. Again, no.

Expand full comment

Only speaking the truth. There is no one other than ourselves to rely on to fix this. The only hopelessness aspect of this is that so very few seem concerned enough to do anything.

Expand full comment

I'm afraid you are shooting the messenger there. We need all the information we can get our hands on right now, we can't fight this if we don't understand what's happening. I for one am very grateful for this blog.

Expand full comment

I'm shooting the guy saying we should give up, not the stack or the author

Expand full comment

The truth is painful. But without it, we will compliance ourselves right out of this world.

Expand full comment

Nobody will be held accountable. There is consensus - every nation is injecting.

They must believe they have a good reason for doing so

Expand full comment

I am sure they do, it’s just that reason, good or otherwise, for doing so is not the reason they are telling us.

Expand full comment

We know this happened in the UK and New York State. It also happened in Victoria at the start of the 'pandemic' when a nurse at a care home was incorrectly diagnosed with cvd. All staff were sent home and the patients locked in without care, food or water for days. Many died and their deaths were used to justify the first statewide lockdown. There was even an official enquiry which noted the residents died of neglect. No one was ever prosecuted

Expand full comment

It happened throughout most Western nations. It also happened in multiple locations in the US- around 15 different states.

They all worked from the similar sets of protocols. How was that coordinated? Easy- WHO regulations.

Global Health Governance.

Expand full comment

Andrews skated yet again. Teflon Dan.

Expand full comment

We also know this was happening in north Idaho all through spring 2022. Iirc, it was permitted to be standard of care by hhs/cms/cdc to admit hospital entry to vaxxed patients at the first sign of a sniffle but "go home, come back later" was for the unvaxxed. Even minor procedures for unvaxxed were done in the ER parking lot.

Expand full comment

I can recall seeing examples of 'parking lot' procedures for the unvaccinated in NZ too.

Expand full comment

After all, "Australia is a penal colony for criminals" myth is revived.

I've stayed there on a business trip, but the normal people were all nice people.

Expand full comment

Thank you; yes we are! ;-)

Expand full comment

It's funny how the government and the medical profession don't seem to be interested in unvaxxed deaths outside hospital, or the thousands of excess mortality deaths, or the correlation between number of vaxx doses and hospital admissions, or the rate of subclinical myocarditis in vaxxed children, etc, etc.

Expand full comment

It's like pain and swelling at the injection site: 'That just means it's working'

Expand full comment

Good work sir!

Expand full comment

It is totally possible. The amount of COVID malfeasance in Australia is beyond imagination.

Another possibility is that the unvaccinated are no longer dying at all and they move some "unknown status" deaths into unvaccinated, or possibly count people 2 weeks past-4th-booster as unvaxed, to avoid embarrassment.

I hope that one day we will know and Australian and other Covid criminals will be prosecuted within a new legal framework.

Thank you for exposing these criminals.

Expand full comment
author
Jan 8, 2023·edited Jan 8, 2023Author

I've linked to your post too, just seen it! (Why do we seem to have parallel thoughts so often - are we related? 😂)

Expand full comment
Jan 9, 2023·edited Jan 9, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

You have an uncanny ability to spot bad stuff in gene sequences though!

I hate Australian and NZ Covid criminals

Expand full comment
author

IKR.... 😉

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Japan is a country with a high vaccination rate, but vaccination is voluntary by law. A certain clinic put out a notice telling people who were vaccinated not to come, but this did not result in a suspension of their license. Physician independence is recognized.

You can take the bullet train, you can go to the supermarket, you can take the plane, you can go to the store, you can go to the hospital or clinic without injected.

However, depending on the location, it is required to wear a mask, but it is accepted with a cheap mask that has almost no filtering effect.This is also weird.

Compared to the above, Australia, NZ, and Canada seem on medias no different from the CCP's suppression of human rights as far as Cov19 policies are concerned from Japan's (maybe me only) point of view. I even wonder if it has something to do with the inferiority complex of being a colony of the British Empire which isn't severe as NZ now. Or maybe politicians are too good&serious to dance in the palms of Pfizer, BillGates, Schwab, etc.

It is a problem that public health doctors are at the top of national health policy in both Japan and NZ,AUS,CA. In Japan, if I look at their educational background, they are unintelligent medical graduates. Looking at the content of their education, they surely have no ability of immature immunology (this is still in the early stages of development, and actual researchers say that they don't know anything about it, probably like this), molecular biology, genetic engineering, and virology. What they have learned is that there is also such fields. Public health is concerned with classification of infectious diseases, testing methods, movement restrictions and tracking methods, relationship with general laws, procurement and distribution of pharmaceuticals, coordination of medical institutions, operation methods of related laws and regulations, numerical understanding, etc. There are many small things and it will be difficult, but I think they are not familiar with the contents of the above (immunology, etc.), so they do not even understand the mechanism of pseudo-mRNA. In addition, ordinary doctors are divided into specialized fields and do not know the contents of the novel pseudo-mRNA, so 90 ordinary doctors died after vaxxed in Canada by last November. If they understood, I think they would have prioritized their own lives over the medical licenses. So they didn't understand pseudo-mRNA.

Ordinary doctors are also subdivided into internal medicine, such as gastrointestinal internal medicine, cardiovascular internal medicine, endocrinology and diabetes internal medicine, nephrology, respiratory internal medicine, hematology, neurology, and rheumatism internal medicine, and there are a lot of papers. I think it's hard to study it every day. Therefore, they probably thought that vaccines should be left to public health as before.

But public health doctors, as I said before, are like the blind leading the country. Of course, there is no way politicians can understand pseudo-mRNA except medical manias.

Expand full comment
RemovedJan 11, 2023·edited Jan 11, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Yes, they've adopted the Harold Shipman protocol

This is what we are up against: OCPD. It's a big part of the reason for the bureaupathology of the vaccine advocates:

Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD), which is common in the military, where those with the condition tend to be rapidly promoted (e.g., Colonel Russell Williams, convicted serial killer and former Commanding Officer of Canada's largest airforce base), law enforcement (e. g., Derek Chauvin, Idaho killings suspect Bryan Kohberger), academia, the judiciary, educators and serial killers appears also to be common in public health bureaucrats. OCPD is a disorder of overcontrol. When dialled up, it's similar to psychopathy, with which it is often comorbid.

It's characterised by, among other things, self-righteousness, tyrannical or dictatorial tendencies, perfectionism (especially WRT expectations of others), neatness ("serial killer neat"), punctuality, the ability to dial down or turn off empathy, perspective shifting deficits, rigidity, overconscientious and enjoyment of creating fear in subordinates. It has links to sadism.

People with the condition are functionally rigid, stubborn and tend to think they are "always right" and that there is only one correct way of doing things, which is their way. Hitler and Ghandi are good examples. They are angered when they don't get their own way and are overconcerned with ethics and morality. (Hitler was vegetarian and Bryan Kohberger is vegan.)

OCPD individuals are annoyed when proven to be wrong and they double down on their mistakes. Because of their perspective shifting deficits they have trouble with alternative hypothesis generation and are unsuited to be scientists. They are also unsuited for management roles and unsuited to be public health bureaucrats although, due to attention to detail, can make good accountants.

A big part of their problem is their perspective taking deficits and cognitive distortions and fallacies in their reasoning. They can do well on tasks requiring attention to detail but they can't readily adjust their perspective to identify and correct for weaknesses in theory or methodology.

They tend to rise to the top in ethics councils, professional associations, regulatory bodies and the military as well as, it appears, the public health bureaucracy.

Present them with evidence of vaccine harms and individuals with OCPD can't adjust their perspective or admit their mistakes and instead they just double down, and then seek revenge. Because it's an egosyntonic disorder they have no idea of how f-cked up they are and how much harm they cause.

To further understand OCPD, consider the following description of Anthony Fauci by Scott Sturman M.D:

"The mindset of Field Marshal Douglas Haig, World War I’s worst general, springs to mind, when drawing a comparison to Anthony Fauci. By some historical accounts Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig bears the distinction of WWI’s worst general. He rose to Commander of British Expeditionary Forces and led Allied armies during the slaughter and futility at the battles of the Somme and Passchendaele. Known for his self confidence and inflexibility, he repeatedly ordered soldiers over the top to “no man’s land” and into the path of German machine guns. No number of casualties or unachieved objectives could dissuade him from his singular approach to combat. Nigel Davies, historian and educator, points out that General Haig was emblematic of the chateau general - dictating and directing but far removed from the battlefield: They were Chateau Generals in approach and in attitude. They drew lines on maps without adequately considering the terrain, issued impossible instructions without looking at the state of the ground, and ran completely inadequate communications that were far from capable of keeping track of, or controlling, a modern battlefield. In a similar respect, despite his academic and professional accomplishments, Dr. Anthony Fauci has no background or experience in clinical medicine and is ill equipped to lead the SARS-CoV-2 response. His purview is that of a research scientist and entrenched bureaucrat, who is far removed from patient contact. His career is enmeshed with the pharmaceutical industry, whose financial ties with federal medical regulatory institutions are well described. Throughout his career he has denied patients easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatments in lieu of patented medications with high risk profiles and of dubious efficacy. In 1987 despite overwhelming clinical evidence, he told AIDS activists that the prophylactic use of the common antibiotic Bactrim to treat pneumocystis carnii pneumonia was ineffective and possibly dangerous. Through private donations the company Lymphomed circumvented the NIAID and conducted successful clinical trials. The delay cost the lives of nearly 17,000 immunocompromised patients."

Expand full comment

Yes, it was these neat freaks that caused 99% of the trouble in the cross-cultural work arena. They always impose their way, or their cultures way, everywhere they go. They have their good points but should never be allowed in positions of ultimate responsibility for the wellbeing of others. They are fiercely loyal to systems and organizations rather than to the members of the public they are supposed to serve.

Expand full comment

That is a fascinating comment, Awake. It explains a lot about some of the dysfunctional individuals, which over the years, seem to gravitate up to senior roles in organisations. The template also seems to have application (no pun) in the software development industry, and may lend weight to explaining the ‘philanthropath’ phenomenon amongst the mega-billionaire class who seek to control the direction of human development.

Your explanation of the ‘Chateau General’ phenomenon in WW1 also makes a lot of sense – although caution demands that the label should not be applied indiscriminately to every Western Front general - as the deceivers of the corporate media tend to do. Many were humane individuals who spent significant time at the front line making personal observations of what was actually going on, and thereby earned the respect of their frontline subordinates. Quite a few paid a high price for this because they became casualties. A major road around Sydney Airport is named after one such Australian General who perished at the Western Front – now largely forgotten.

Expand full comment

I didn’t think this nightmare could get worse, I see that it can. Thank you for this analysis and update💔💔

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

One thing that this article highlights for all of us is the importance of an explicit medical will for your family members and yourselves. If you have not yet sat down with your parents etc. to discuss this, please do. There are templates online that you can fill out according to wishes, and checking that it passes legal requirements is also wise.

Many people, especially older ones, may be inclined to agree to wording such as letting the doctors use best medical judgment. As Arkmedic's post here shows, we cannot rely on that passive approach. The medical will should therefore make explicit instructions for certain conditions: "In the case of severe injury where I am no longer able to communicate, family member X must be brought to the hospital and must agree to medical decisions.... I wish to receive all possible care to be kept alive in Y condition..."

Expand full comment

Good comment, Bird. I agree entirely. What has being taking place in some U.S. hospitals is a disgrace.

Expand full comment

I am expecting the same for myself. If anyone asks, I am not suicidal, and I am in great health.

Expand full comment

Igor had similar concerns in a recent post.

Each week I look at the Deaths in NSW, especially the elderly who are left to die in their Aged Care beds or in their own homes. Kerry Chant makes sure you never have jab status for those 2 cohorts.

So hopefully your FOI could be clarified when they get back to you, asking for that crucial missing information.

One complication arises for those dying at home, some going to the Coroner.

It would be good to see if they will tell you the survival rate and ages of those sent to ICU.

What special treatments are given to those in ICU compared to those dying in the 3 other locations?

How many dying have been enrolled in drug trials?

I think the February 19 weekly report was never published.

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/weekly-reports-archive.aspx

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Isn't this what's happening in the US with rundeathisnear?! Pretty sure it happened to my uncle in August 2021 in TN.

Expand full comment

Wow, that is a disturbing possibility. US states also had big death spikes in Fall, 2021 that were never explained. It was right around the time when hatred against the unvaxxed seemed the hottest, with the President saying (9/9/2021): "We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and the refusal has cost all of us." There are a few graphs on my stack:

https://norstadt.substack.com/p/excess-us-deaths-for-25-to-44-year

https://norstadt.substack.com/p/mortality-in-massachusetts-and-california

Expand full comment
Jan 8, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

At the beginning of the pandemic, I saw an article that said the UK bought a ton of midazolam, it caught my attention because I knew it had been fought against in the USA because it’s a drug given to lethal injection prisoners.

Digging deeper, I saw the UK administered it to 40k people (or bought enough for 40k people, one or the other).

At the same time period, if you go to world o meter, you can clearly see that COVID deaths in the UK spike directly up to 40k people (look for yourself), then flatline for months after.

Do the math.

Expand full comment