I would include ANYONE who made money from this intentionally engineered biotechnology release, including those selling BS supplements,protecols, and paywalled information. Part of the reason that we are still discussing, rather than stopping these damn shots is because people, even those in the "freedom" movements, enabled censorship by pay walling the content. So there are no clean hands here.
There are exceptions and they know who they are, because they can look in the mirror and know they didn't profit from pain, suffering and torture of their fellow humans.😐
And we are still only in the early days of the fallout, and or bloody coupe.
I do understand that point of view but I am also aware of what has happened to the doctors that spoke out and how the institutional machinery destroys them. This goes all the way back to Andrew Wakefield. I personally know doctors who spoke out about the vaccine industry and ended up in naturopathy - which could be seen as "selling supplements".
Those people who are no longer allowed to make a living as a doctor need to be allowed to make a living doing something else that doesn't include going to work for pharma. One way or another that will be seen as "grifting" but I would ask people to bear context in mind and ask "what would you rather they do to make a living?"
At the same time, I wouldn't advise spending $100 on a bottle of supplements. If people are going to sell cheap supplements for a huge markup they should rightly be criticised. But selling supplements per se is not a red flag for me any more than selling a book or releasing a film is, under the circumstances.
IMO with the exception of emergency medicine & surgery, there’s little value in modern medicine. Drs for the most part are drug pushers; there’s little to no preventive medicine happening. 99% of the time I call on a Naturopathic doctor if I need assistance... God Bless the honest physicians, for they are our warriors.
Agreed, I don't object to one's right to make a living in a normal society setting. We are in a war (emergency powers are still engaged in large portions of the world), so in the same way i object to the gun runners making bank during a war, i object to those increasing the gap between those who have the information and those who don't. As a not currently practicing Naturopath, even the CAM practitioners are steering people onto a format of pharmaceutical industry, only slightly less regulated! The supplement industry is made up of 60% pharma (trading under different subsidiaries, etc), and the "excipients" are garbage in most instances. But🤷♀️ client for life, because the side effects are later to appear.🤦♀️🤦♀️
My objection is to those (CAM or Allopathic or other wise) is to them making a living using the same practices as pharma (using poor science, false, subjective claims and using marketing tactics like endorsements etc), to seek their unfounded cures (find me someone that's made a product that actually can claim to "stop spike, permanently clear long covid symptoms, or detox contaminants, in the long term, or more than bloody 3 months really!)
They can't, ( but they do) and they know it, because this is brand new territory- the human genome has never been integrated like this level, or in this super speed.
Yet while they "make an alternative living", they point fingers at pharma, and anyone who disagrees with them.
I object to moral hypocrisy, especially when taking advantage (intentional or otherwise) of the hardest hit- low socioeconomic sectors of society who were/are sacrificed first, second and third.😐😤
It affects and will continue to affect the entire human species,
microbiome and halobiome. I'm sure few will agree with me, I'm a nobody
And my comments above make people uncomfortable, but I can stare into my eyes in the mirror, and know that I have shared, yelled, written EVERY single bit of valuable information about this extinction level event, literally saving lives, for free, without a single blood covered cent being made, and I still have fiscal obligations, commitments etc.
But hey 🤷♀️ BTJMO. Thank you for doing what you do, without prejudice.🤗🤗
Never doubted it was made in a lab. Never doubted infectious non replicating clones.
Know that without evil stupid human beings, there would never be a worldwide pandemic...we have gone into every place on this earth and haven't had a pandemic in 100 years. We never will again.
I think this is correct but haven't been able to find an official definition beyond the dictionary and wikipedia so far... If you find something reliable please can you drop in replies?
Dunno what be "official"; some United States statutory definition? I have a copy of Webster's Third New International Dictionary, copyright 1966, and looked it up there. Does the definition change every year or so as some commenters suggest?
I actually lost this debate to someone on my fakebook timeline whom I am used to crushing in most cases. Yes, some definitions got weaker, although it seems the wayback machine is jamming the word pandemic now so I don't have links to compare them, but the wording is in the conversation we had. Here's my friends response, a little over two years ago.
You claim that this is totalitarian takeover disguised as pandemic response, claiming it to be a planned event being orchestrated through changed definitions and reporting standards, starting with the dramatically altered definition of the word “pandemic”. And offer as evidence of this frivolous accusation, evidence that Merriam Webster’s definition for pandemic had changed from:
“occurring over a wide geographic area and affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the population”
to
“occurring over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affecting a significant proportion of the population”
In the past 2 decades, many modern medical texts have NOT even defined the term “pandemic”. Even authoritative texts about pandemics do NOT list it in their indexes, including such resources as comprehensive histories of medicine, classic epidemiology textbooks, the Institute of Medicine’s influential 1992 report on emerging infections, and acclaimed works about pandemics.
As such there is no single accepted definition of the term “pandemic”. So how is it even possible to claim that there has been a deliberate change in a definition that doesn’t even exist in the first place? And more to the point there has never been a consensus as to what the term “pandemic” even means.
As noted below, in several random samplings, you will find various definitions:
1. “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people.”
The International Epidemiology Association’s Dictionary of Epidemiology
2. “pandemic, outbreak of infectious disease that occurs over a wide geographical area and that is of high prevalence, generally affecting a significant proportion of the world’s population, usually over the course of several months.”
Encyclopedia Brittanica
3. “ Medical Definition of pandemic: occurring over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affecting a significant proportion of the population”
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
4. “an occurrence in which a disease spreads very quickly and affects a large number of people over a wide area or throughout the world.”
English Language Learners Definition of pandemic
5. “A pandemic is an epidemic occurring on a scale that crosses international boundaries, usually affecting people on a worldwide scale”
Porta, Miquel, ed. (2008). Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-19-531449-6. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
6. Pandemic medical definition
“(of a disease) existing in almost all of an area or in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
Cambridge dictionary
7. "an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people"
Last JM, editor.
A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
8. “An epidemic (a sudden outbreak) that becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, or the world due to a susceptible population. By definition, a true pandemic causes a high degree of mortality (death)”
Medterms medical dictionary a-z list Charles Patrick Davis, MD, PhD
9. “A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world at a particular time.”
Oxford English and Spanish Dictionary
10. “A pandemic is an occurrence of a disease that affects many people over a very wide area.”
Collins English Dictionary
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects many people across a whole country or the whole world”
Macmillan dictionary
You had claimed that the Webster definition was made “much less rigorous”, with two different changes. First, the number of people affected plummeted from “an exceptionally high proportion of the population” down to simply “a significant proportion of the population”. Worse yet, you claim they also inserted the word “typically”, a very vague word making it clear that a pandemic may not even reach this greatly lowered threshold.
And within these random definitions you will find NO two that are the same, as well as the use of what you referred to as “vague” words such as “usually”, “generally”, “typically” and “many”:
1. “USUALLY affecting a large number of people”
2. “GENERALLY affecting a SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION of the world’s population”
3. “TYPICALLY affecting a SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION of the population”
4. “and affects a large number of people”
5. “USUALLY affecting people on a worldwide scale”
6. " in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
7. “USUALLY affecting a large number of people”
8. “becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, or the world”
9. “widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world”
10. “a disease that affects MANY people over a very wide area.”
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects MANY people across a whole country or the whole world”
What do we find to be consistent between these eleven random definitions? That a pandemic is generally defined as an infectious disease that is world wide. THAT, as I had noted, had NOT changed as a result of the edits made by Merriam Webster.
1. “an EPIDEMIC occurring WORLDWIDE”
2. “pandemic, outbreak of infectious disease that occurs over A WIDE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA”
3. “occurring over A WIDE GEOGRAPHIC AREA”
4. “an occurrence in which a disease spreads very quickly and affects a large number of people over A WIDE AREA OR THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.”
5. “A pandemic is an epidemic occurring on a scale that crosses INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES”
6. “(of a disease) existing in almost ALL OF AN AREA or in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
7. "an epidemic occurring WORLDWIDE, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries”
8. “An epidemic (a sudden outbreak) that becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, OR THE WORLD”
9. “A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease OVER A WHOLE COUNTRY OR THE WORLD”
10. “A pandemic is an occurrence of a disease that affects MANY PEOPLE OVER A VERY WIDE AREA.”
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects many people across A WHOLE COUNTRY OR THE WHOLE WORLD”
In regards to your second accusation that the definition used by Merriam-Webster deliberately included “vague” words, we find the SAME “vague” words being used in seven of the above definitions LONG before Merriam-Webster’s definition was altered. Words such as:
1. “usually”
2. “generally” “significant” “usually”
3. “typically”
4. “large number”
5. “usually”
6. “almost”
7. “usually” “large number”
Your argument that ONE minuscule change made by Merriam-Webster was of any consequence, is total bullshit and does NOT support the accusation you have made. Claiming ONE example of a definition change to be sufficient evidence to support your accusations, you are once again showing how delusional you can be at times.
Absolutely!!!! It was the greed of the Hospital CEO’s, CFO’s & CMO’s that gave the kill orders to the time clock punching doctors and nurses! The Medical Industrial Complex!
Have you managed to follow the chain back to the Fort Detrick biowarfare labs yet?
I can't escape the thought that much more of the morbidity and mortality of the Covid constructs was known before 2019.
I look at Event 201 and its precursors and can't help but see deep Intelligence Community support. Follow this back to the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission and all the same characters seem to keep appearing. Henry Kissinger appeared to be a bishop-level player in this globalist chess match.
I read the Pradhan paper when it first came out, and discovered 4 HIV inserts, unmistakable human insertions, but he was intimidated and funding withdrawn. SARS, GP120, SV40, HepB. Just how long has this been going on, whilst we were asleep?
It was obvious from the beginning the bat/pangolin story was a cover to me and many. I have been banned from twitter for over two years permanently, but would enjoy reading the fools still trying yo defend the preposterous wet market story. I agree it is still being used to divide and conquer as much is being used the same way in this country. Thank you for the good read as always.
I tried appealing a couple of times. I also tried right after Elon bought it with no luck. I think he only focused on restoring big accounts which I was not. I think at this stage I could possibly just create a new one but now with substack I can follow most of the one’s that truly matter.
I don't see how anyone can argue zoonosis after this. However, we've known this for years so I'm interested in the 'Twitter war' you mention.
It would be handy if you could summarise your position because of all the arguments. As I gather, you think:
- Sars2 was created in a lab (obvs);
- It was leaked on purpose?
- It leaked from Wuhan or that is being used as a distraction?
- It caused a pandemic (I saw you wrote it killed millions)?
- The reaction and policies caused more deaths (obvs);
- However, lockdowns etc should never be imposed even if there is a genuine pandemic?
- Whilst Sars2 is dangerous, most people can fight it off ok?
- The vaccines are more dangerous;
I'm struggling between the SARS2 was actually dangerous but lockdowns were more dangerous argument and SARS2 was never dangerous to the majority of people. And if you think the latter, were viral clones used in various places which quickly attenuated?
SARS2, SARS, MERS, HMPV and a few others made in a lab
Released on purpose (but we don't know the geography of the release)
Released in Wuhan, Italy, Iran, other sites with no pandemic spread pattern (artificial spread)
It caused a technical pandemic (I have used 6 million+ but that does not specifically refer to the virus, rather the interventions associated with the virus)
Policies including euthanasia (UK, Vic Aus. US) caused more deaths that would have occurred if the "pandemic" had been managed in the same was as SARS1.
Lockdowns are contrary to human rights and have no scientific evidence in a randomised or high quality trial taking into account non-infectious mortality and morbidity
COVID is a respiratory virus with low mortality when managed with early treatment and even observation (compared to neglect)
No evidence exists for a reduction in ACM following the vaccines and temporal evidence suggests a strong associate with the vaccines and increased ACM. The magnitude of this appears to be in the region of 10-20%, which is unprecedented in modern history.
I do not yet know whether the spread pattern is via naked virus, infectious clones or lyophilised vectors. Combinations are possible. The least likely is a naked virus as there has never been a sustained pandemic of a coronavirus.
If your thinking evolves on this, please let us know. Extreme respect for you and your work. I know I would not have survived this without you...I would be in an insane asylum by now.
Especially as to the dispersal...I am wondering if lyophilised vectors might include DNA plasmids? I just learned they have been making them for over 70 years...
But I don't know how long they survive, what they are put into, etc. I've seen the patent for the infectious clones (there might be two)....but I suspect that a naked virus too would mutate too fast to go around the world in a sustained pandemic.
Can you comment on the Kyoto paper? I learned of it a few weeks back. Is it real? If so, it is not only proof of a lab creation/experiment but of a global release. No one seems to want to touch it.
Unnatural evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 variants and possibility of deliberate natural selection (https://zenodo.org/records/8361577)
They don't want to touch it because it's covered in DoD doody.😉
The Omnicron was the "fingerprint" of the bioweapon release. 2020 was a psyop cover for the actual later release.
The shots are additional "releases" of vesicle nanotechnology. Testing "shedding" vaccines and exosomal therapy, because the nanotech industries are HUGE and you can't hook up power to the IoN, with out the IoB up and running first😉
The latter... In Italy, in NYC and sprinkled about to give the appearance of a pandemic...aided by PCR tests which tested positive if you had cold or flu.
And they plan to do it again.
But this time I think they know how to make replicating clones. God help us all.
I don't believe Jessica Hockett exposed Elmhurst until the horse had long bolted. I and others pointed out the Elmhurst scam at the time. Jessica is now focused on bashing Kory, Malone and Rose.
I read in 2020 that most of the primers for the reagents for PCR and Lateral flow tests are made in China.
I have this niggling suspicion that if one were to put primers for all popular respiratory diseases into the reagent labelled covid then any bug would show up as covid. If one took out all the primers from the flu reagents they would not show a signal and for some reason the flu disappeared during 2020.
It would be a great way to get free infection figures for a trending virus.
Watch the VSRF from last night rumble of the nurses that have come out documenting what they witnessed in various hospitals. There was also an RT that said be knew when the threshold to vent was 3.0 liters of O2 he knew the protocols were against every known guideline and to kill. It was all for effect to make people scared enough to blindly march to the shot…and death.
Thank you for everything. For everything you did from the very begining. You helped a lot of people .... from the begining. I will never forget your tweets & articles 🐭❤️
I created the word coincidism to describe people who blame medical harm on coincidence, but of course it also covers attempts to cover up evidence of crimes against humanity like we see explained pretty clearly in this article, with so much circumstantial evidence of not only human involvement in the development of covid 19, but specific humans conducting specific transactions for specific components of the spike protein. All just coincidences.
We are facing some serious horrors in 2024, but we'll also make great strides in response. Actually, more and more we are moving to offense rather than defense. We win this with words. Coincidism is a filthy thing that goes right along with fascism and communism. We counter coincidism not only with solid science, but also with creativity, humor and love.
Ah Kahn Syed clearly - "Well on twitter there is a war raging to distract everybody who could possibly highlight, expose, share, understand and talk about this story. These events are designed to waste everybody’s time and divide and conquer dissident groups."
BINGO!!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! Malone’s $25 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against the Breggins and Jane Ruby. Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Jessica Hockett openly arguing, but calling it discourse over a hot pile of nothing burger with Dr. Pierre Kory. Now Dr Simon Goddek, attacks Naomi Wolf publicly; while Dr Malone attacks DailyClout, Berenson vs Kirsch and on, and on, and on...
Discord, Dissension, Divisiveness and Distraction in the ranks. United We Stand, Divided We Fall.
I have a sock puppet acct on Twit 😁. Then tension has become unbelievable within what is supposed to the same side. I could see the insidious shift of many distracting from important issues, such as GOF and DURC for a long while. In most cases they stopped even focusing on fighting against terrible "countermeasures" ie, lockdowns, masking, vaccines, mandates, as the focus seeming become about attacking others that don't hold their views and recruiting to their views. I SO appreciate you standing your ground and continuing to talk about the real issues which is what will keep the "bad guys" from getting away with having done this, instead of pretending their is no "this". Jessica's article is a great compliment with this one.
Yes it seemed artificial when they started attacking Malone, Kory and Rose instead of the real perpetrators of the crimes we have witnessed over the last 4 years.
The most they could possible accuse (that is, claim without good evidence) that group of is being sucked in to the ponzi scheme at various levels. Wow. What a crime. So let's just ignore Bourla, Sunak, Johnson, Biden, Trump, Fauci, Rasmussen, Farrar, Holmes, Dwyer, Shi, Field, Andersen, Bedford (yeah this is just off the top of my head).
Yes let's give THOSE people a free pass and make sure we go after Malone Kory and Rose.
I appreciate your work but don’t agree with you on this. People like Kory, Kirsch, Malone, etc., to the extent they helped build the narrative of a very dangerous pandemic virus, were instrumental in enabling the success of the kill shots, where the real damage is ongoing. By way of anecdotal support, as I read this article last night paramedics with full lights flashing arrived on my street to take the neighbor’s son-in-law to the hospital for “heart issues.”
Thank you once again! (And...the frankenstein-virus' release was timely coordinated to assist in stealing an election...and test the global power grab!) Evil abounds.
Thank you for helping to make these complex issues a bit easier to understand. Well done. Thank also for stepping up and doing what is right in the face of intense opposition. Kudos. I wanted to mention that it appears you have a typo in your headline.
Thanks for the heads up. I saw and changed it in the media post section, but forgot to update it in the article! You have no idea how irritating they are!
Everyone involved in engineering, funding, or propagandizing this Frankenstein virus deserves hard time in prison.
Many of those life sentences should end abruptly at a date and time set by the court.
They deserve something far more, shall we say, permanent.
I would include ANYONE who made money from this intentionally engineered biotechnology release, including those selling BS supplements,protecols, and paywalled information. Part of the reason that we are still discussing, rather than stopping these damn shots is because people, even those in the "freedom" movements, enabled censorship by pay walling the content. So there are no clean hands here.
There are exceptions and they know who they are, because they can look in the mirror and know they didn't profit from pain, suffering and torture of their fellow humans.😐
And we are still only in the early days of the fallout, and or bloody coupe.
#darkdays2come #getready #everythingisstillonschedule
#wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
I do understand that point of view but I am also aware of what has happened to the doctors that spoke out and how the institutional machinery destroys them. This goes all the way back to Andrew Wakefield. I personally know doctors who spoke out about the vaccine industry and ended up in naturopathy - which could be seen as "selling supplements".
Those people who are no longer allowed to make a living as a doctor need to be allowed to make a living doing something else that doesn't include going to work for pharma. One way or another that will be seen as "grifting" but I would ask people to bear context in mind and ask "what would you rather they do to make a living?"
At the same time, I wouldn't advise spending $100 on a bottle of supplements. If people are going to sell cheap supplements for a huge markup they should rightly be criticised. But selling supplements per se is not a red flag for me any more than selling a book or releasing a film is, under the circumstances.
IMO with the exception of emergency medicine & surgery, there’s little value in modern medicine. Drs for the most part are drug pushers; there’s little to no preventive medicine happening. 99% of the time I call on a Naturopathic doctor if I need assistance... God Bless the honest physicians, for they are our warriors.
Agreed, I don't object to one's right to make a living in a normal society setting. We are in a war (emergency powers are still engaged in large portions of the world), so in the same way i object to the gun runners making bank during a war, i object to those increasing the gap between those who have the information and those who don't. As a not currently practicing Naturopath, even the CAM practitioners are steering people onto a format of pharmaceutical industry, only slightly less regulated! The supplement industry is made up of 60% pharma (trading under different subsidiaries, etc), and the "excipients" are garbage in most instances. But🤷♀️ client for life, because the side effects are later to appear.🤦♀️🤦♀️
My objection is to those (CAM or Allopathic or other wise) is to them making a living using the same practices as pharma (using poor science, false, subjective claims and using marketing tactics like endorsements etc), to seek their unfounded cures (find me someone that's made a product that actually can claim to "stop spike, permanently clear long covid symptoms, or detox contaminants, in the long term, or more than bloody 3 months really!)
They can't, ( but they do) and they know it, because this is brand new territory- the human genome has never been integrated like this level, or in this super speed.
Yet while they "make an alternative living", they point fingers at pharma, and anyone who disagrees with them.
I object to moral hypocrisy, especially when taking advantage (intentional or otherwise) of the hardest hit- low socioeconomic sectors of society who were/are sacrificed first, second and third.😐😤
It affects and will continue to affect the entire human species,
microbiome and halobiome. I'm sure few will agree with me, I'm a nobody
And my comments above make people uncomfortable, but I can stare into my eyes in the mirror, and know that I have shared, yelled, written EVERY single bit of valuable information about this extinction level event, literally saving lives, for free, without a single blood covered cent being made, and I still have fiscal obligations, commitments etc.
But hey 🤷♀️ BTJMO. Thank you for doing what you do, without prejudice.🤗🤗
#remember #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Never doubted it was made in a lab. Never doubted infectious non replicating clones.
Know that without evil stupid human beings, there would never be a worldwide pandemic...we have gone into every place on this earth and haven't had a pandemic in 100 years. We never will again.
UNLESS WE TINKER WITH IT IN A BIOLAB.
End.
There never was a pandemic..
1. They changed definition of pandemic shortly before
2 .
The people were killed by medical malpractice because they withheld early treatment
3. Covid was easily treatable & Drs who treated early had close to 💯
4. The rest followed BAD orders & killed their patients
It was a pandemic. Lethality was not part of the definition in 1966.
I think this is correct but haven't been able to find an official definition beyond the dictionary and wikipedia so far... If you find something reliable please can you drop in replies?
Dunno what be "official"; some United States statutory definition? I have a copy of Webster's Third New International Dictionary, copyright 1966, and looked it up there. Does the definition change every year or so as some commenters suggest?
Can you show me a solid reference for "they changed the definition of pandemic shortly before"?
Wikipedia goes back to 2003
I actually lost this debate to someone on my fakebook timeline whom I am used to crushing in most cases. Yes, some definitions got weaker, although it seems the wayback machine is jamming the word pandemic now so I don't have links to compare them, but the wording is in the conversation we had. Here's my friends response, a little over two years ago.
You claim that this is totalitarian takeover disguised as pandemic response, claiming it to be a planned event being orchestrated through changed definitions and reporting standards, starting with the dramatically altered definition of the word “pandemic”. And offer as evidence of this frivolous accusation, evidence that Merriam Webster’s definition for pandemic had changed from:
“occurring over a wide geographic area and affecting an exceptionally high proportion of the population”
to
“occurring over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affecting a significant proportion of the population”
In the past 2 decades, many modern medical texts have NOT even defined the term “pandemic”. Even authoritative texts about pandemics do NOT list it in their indexes, including such resources as comprehensive histories of medicine, classic epidemiology textbooks, the Institute of Medicine’s influential 1992 report on emerging infections, and acclaimed works about pandemics.
As such there is no single accepted definition of the term “pandemic”. So how is it even possible to claim that there has been a deliberate change in a definition that doesn’t even exist in the first place? And more to the point there has never been a consensus as to what the term “pandemic” even means.
As noted below, in several random samplings, you will find various definitions:
1. “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people.”
The International Epidemiology Association’s Dictionary of Epidemiology
2. “pandemic, outbreak of infectious disease that occurs over a wide geographical area and that is of high prevalence, generally affecting a significant proportion of the world’s population, usually over the course of several months.”
Encyclopedia Brittanica
3. “ Medical Definition of pandemic: occurring over a wide geographic area (such as multiple countries or continents) and typically affecting a significant proportion of the population”
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
4. “an occurrence in which a disease spreads very quickly and affects a large number of people over a wide area or throughout the world.”
English Language Learners Definition of pandemic
5. “A pandemic is an epidemic occurring on a scale that crosses international boundaries, usually affecting people on a worldwide scale”
Porta, Miquel, ed. (2008). Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-19-531449-6. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
6. Pandemic medical definition
“(of a disease) existing in almost all of an area or in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
Cambridge dictionary
7. "an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people"
Last JM, editor.
A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
8. “An epidemic (a sudden outbreak) that becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, or the world due to a susceptible population. By definition, a true pandemic causes a high degree of mortality (death)”
Medterms medical dictionary a-z list Charles Patrick Davis, MD, PhD
9. “A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world at a particular time.”
Oxford English and Spanish Dictionary
10. “A pandemic is an occurrence of a disease that affects many people over a very wide area.”
Collins English Dictionary
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects many people across a whole country or the whole world”
Macmillan dictionary
You had claimed that the Webster definition was made “much less rigorous”, with two different changes. First, the number of people affected plummeted from “an exceptionally high proportion of the population” down to simply “a significant proportion of the population”. Worse yet, you claim they also inserted the word “typically”, a very vague word making it clear that a pandemic may not even reach this greatly lowered threshold.
And within these random definitions you will find NO two that are the same, as well as the use of what you referred to as “vague” words such as “usually”, “generally”, “typically” and “many”:
1. “USUALLY affecting a large number of people”
2. “GENERALLY affecting a SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION of the world’s population”
3. “TYPICALLY affecting a SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION of the population”
4. “and affects a large number of people”
5. “USUALLY affecting people on a worldwide scale”
6. " in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
7. “USUALLY affecting a large number of people”
8. “becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, or the world”
9. “widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world”
10. “a disease that affects MANY people over a very wide area.”
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects MANY people across a whole country or the whole world”
What do we find to be consistent between these eleven random definitions? That a pandemic is generally defined as an infectious disease that is world wide. THAT, as I had noted, had NOT changed as a result of the edits made by Merriam Webster.
1. “an EPIDEMIC occurring WORLDWIDE”
2. “pandemic, outbreak of infectious disease that occurs over A WIDE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA”
3. “occurring over A WIDE GEOGRAPHIC AREA”
4. “an occurrence in which a disease spreads very quickly and affects a large number of people over A WIDE AREA OR THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.”
5. “A pandemic is an epidemic occurring on a scale that crosses INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES”
6. “(of a disease) existing in almost ALL OF AN AREA or in almost all of a group of people, animals, or plants:”
7. "an epidemic occurring WORLDWIDE, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries”
8. “An epidemic (a sudden outbreak) that becomes very widespread and affects a whole region, a continent, OR THE WORLD”
9. “A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease OVER A WHOLE COUNTRY OR THE WORLD”
10. “A pandemic is an occurrence of a disease that affects MANY PEOPLE OVER A VERY WIDE AREA.”
11. “an occurrence of a disease that affects many people across A WHOLE COUNTRY OR THE WHOLE WORLD”
In regards to your second accusation that the definition used by Merriam-Webster deliberately included “vague” words, we find the SAME “vague” words being used in seven of the above definitions LONG before Merriam-Webster’s definition was altered. Words such as:
1. “usually”
2. “generally” “significant” “usually”
3. “typically”
4. “large number”
5. “usually”
6. “almost”
7. “usually” “large number”
Your argument that ONE minuscule change made by Merriam-Webster was of any consequence, is total bullshit and does NOT support the accusation you have made. Claiming ONE example of a definition change to be sufficient evidence to support your accusations, you are once again showing how delusional you can be at times.
Absolutely!!!! It was the greed of the Hospital CEO’s, CFO’s & CMO’s that gave the kill orders to the time clock punching doctors and nurses! The Medical Industrial Complex!
Shi Zhengli...now where have I heard that name recently?
Oh, I remember! This year she's been messing around with putting GoF'd pangolin coronavirus into humanised mice. And they all died!
Meanwhile, back in North Carolina, Ralph Baric is working on a spike virus vaccine. As in the spike will be the vaccine.
Truly, we live in blessed times.
Have you managed to follow the chain back to the Fort Detrick biowarfare labs yet?
I can't escape the thought that much more of the morbidity and mortality of the Covid constructs was known before 2019.
I look at Event 201 and its precursors and can't help but see deep Intelligence Community support. Follow this back to the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission and all the same characters seem to keep appearing. Henry Kissinger appeared to be a bishop-level player in this globalist chess match.
Yes it pops up occasionally but I think the trail to FD is very well covered up.
"Look over there, not here"
No way 😖😖😖😖 she’s still working
I read the Pradhan paper when it first came out, and discovered 4 HIV inserts, unmistakable human insertions, but he was intimidated and funding withdrawn. SARS, GP120, SV40, HepB. Just how long has this been going on, whilst we were asleep?
It ramped up about 20 years ago
Wow! The medical industrial complex is making profits from illness and not wellness. This is the wrong model.
I read it also when it came out. It was actually reported on Zero Hedge immediately after it was published, before Zero Hedge was domesticated.
It was obvious from the beginning the bat/pangolin story was a cover to me and many. I have been banned from twitter for over two years permanently, but would enjoy reading the fools still trying yo defend the preposterous wet market story. I agree it is still being used to divide and conquer as much is being used the same way in this country. Thank you for the good read as always.
💯 to divide & conquer.. it’s only gonna get way worse now that official election season kicked off .. 🙏
Why would Twitter ban you for that long?
Have you tried to get your account back? Most people have been able to get them back.
I tried appealing a couple of times. I also tried right after Elon bought it with no luck. I think he only focused on restoring big accounts which I was not. I think at this stage I could possibly just create a new one but now with substack I can follow most of the one’s that truly matter.
I also wrote about it yesterday - https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/covid-smoking-gun
I don't see how anyone can argue zoonosis after this. However, we've known this for years so I'm interested in the 'Twitter war' you mention.
It would be handy if you could summarise your position because of all the arguments. As I gather, you think:
- Sars2 was created in a lab (obvs);
- It was leaked on purpose?
- It leaked from Wuhan or that is being used as a distraction?
- It caused a pandemic (I saw you wrote it killed millions)?
- The reaction and policies caused more deaths (obvs);
- However, lockdowns etc should never be imposed even if there is a genuine pandemic?
- Whilst Sars2 is dangerous, most people can fight it off ok?
- The vaccines are more dangerous;
I'm struggling between the SARS2 was actually dangerous but lockdowns were more dangerous argument and SARS2 was never dangerous to the majority of people. And if you think the latter, were viral clones used in various places which quickly attenuated?
For me:
SARS2, SARS, MERS, HMPV and a few others made in a lab
Released on purpose (but we don't know the geography of the release)
Released in Wuhan, Italy, Iran, other sites with no pandemic spread pattern (artificial spread)
It caused a technical pandemic (I have used 6 million+ but that does not specifically refer to the virus, rather the interventions associated with the virus)
Policies including euthanasia (UK, Vic Aus. US) caused more deaths that would have occurred if the "pandemic" had been managed in the same was as SARS1.
Lockdowns are contrary to human rights and have no scientific evidence in a randomised or high quality trial taking into account non-infectious mortality and morbidity
COVID is a respiratory virus with low mortality when managed with early treatment and even observation (compared to neglect)
No evidence exists for a reduction in ACM following the vaccines and temporal evidence suggests a strong associate with the vaccines and increased ACM. The magnitude of this appears to be in the region of 10-20%, which is unprecedented in modern history.
I do not yet know whether the spread pattern is via naked virus, infectious clones or lyophilised vectors. Combinations are possible. The least likely is a naked virus as there has never been a sustained pandemic of a coronavirus.
If your thinking evolves on this, please let us know. Extreme respect for you and your work. I know I would not have survived this without you...I would be in an insane asylum by now.
Especially as to the dispersal...I am wondering if lyophilised vectors might include DNA plasmids? I just learned they have been making them for over 70 years...
But I don't know how long they survive, what they are put into, etc. I've seen the patent for the infectious clones (there might be two)....but I suspect that a naked virus too would mutate too fast to go around the world in a sustained pandemic.
DNA plasmids are very stable
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415062/
Thanks! Any clues as to who released it and how (if in so many locations)?
I'll ask you the same question I posed above...
Can you comment on the Kyoto paper? I learned of it a few weeks back. Is it real? If so, it is not only proof of a lab creation/experiment but of a global release. No one seems to want to touch it.
Unnatural evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 variants and possibility of deliberate natural selection (https://zenodo.org/records/8361577)
https://thehighwire.com/editorial/breaking-top-japanese-virologist-warns-of-manufactured-omicron-strain/
https://swinehoodsremedy.substack.com/p/unnatural-evolution-indisputable
They don't want to touch it because it's covered in DoD doody.😉
The Omnicron was the "fingerprint" of the bioweapon release. 2020 was a psyop cover for the actual later release.
The shots are additional "releases" of vesicle nanotechnology. Testing "shedding" vaccines and exosomal therapy, because the nanotech industries are HUGE and you can't hook up power to the IoN, with out the IoB up and running first😉
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯👍👏👏
Combination gives you better aka wider more reliable coverage. The nanotechnology doesn't work unless you reach certain saturation😉
The latter... In Italy, in NYC and sprinkled about to give the appearance of a pandemic...aided by PCR tests which tested positive if you had cold or flu.
And they plan to do it again.
But this time I think they know how to make replicating clones. God help us all.
It's gonna get a lot uglier, soon. We're gaining momentum but they are still in positions of power...
About Elmhurst- New York. I'm not so sure it was real.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cAnSkQojE_4/
Elmhurst was staged
God bless Jessica Hockett. That woman is a bulldog.
Much admiration.
I don't believe Jessica Hockett exposed Elmhurst until the horse had long bolted. I and others pointed out the Elmhurst scam at the time. Jessica is now focused on bashing Kory, Malone and Rose.
I read in 2020 that most of the primers for the reagents for PCR and Lateral flow tests are made in China.
I have this niggling suspicion that if one were to put primers for all popular respiratory diseases into the reagent labelled covid then any bug would show up as covid. If one took out all the primers from the flu reagents they would not show a signal and for some reason the flu disappeared during 2020.
It would be a great way to get free infection figures for a trending virus.
Yes i suspect that is indeed what was done...dammit all
Watch the VSRF from last night rumble of the nurses that have come out documenting what they witnessed in various hospitals. There was also an RT that said be knew when the threshold to vent was 3.0 liters of O2 he knew the protocols were against every known guideline and to kill. It was all for effect to make people scared enough to blindly march to the shot…and death.
I think they have already teed up something w/ a very quick & 100% fatality....
Thank you for everything. For everything you did from the very begining. You helped a lot of people .... from the begining. I will never forget your tweets & articles 🐭❤️
Thanks Bibi likewise
I created the word coincidism to describe people who blame medical harm on coincidence, but of course it also covers attempts to cover up evidence of crimes against humanity like we see explained pretty clearly in this article, with so much circumstantial evidence of not only human involvement in the development of covid 19, but specific humans conducting specific transactions for specific components of the spike protein. All just coincidences.
We are facing some serious horrors in 2024, but we'll also make great strides in response. Actually, more and more we are moving to offense rather than defense. We win this with words. Coincidism is a filthy thing that goes right along with fascism and communism. We counter coincidism not only with solid science, but also with creativity, humor and love.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coincidism/p/ive-created-a-concept-i-call-coincidism?
Ralph Baric's signature "No See Um's."
Jikkyleaks is one of my trusted sources. I am sorry he is no longer on twitter (at least under this name).
Is Jikkyleaks the same as Ah Kahn Syed?
Ah Kahn Syed clearly - "Well on twitter there is a war raging to distract everybody who could possibly highlight, expose, share, understand and talk about this story. These events are designed to waste everybody’s time and divide and conquer dissident groups."
BINGO!!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! Malone’s $25 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against the Breggins and Jane Ruby. Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Jessica Hockett openly arguing, but calling it discourse over a hot pile of nothing burger with Dr. Pierre Kory. Now Dr Simon Goddek, attacks Naomi Wolf publicly; while Dr Malone attacks DailyClout, Berenson vs Kirsch and on, and on, and on...
Discord, Dissension, Divisiveness and Distraction in the ranks. United We Stand, Divided We Fall.
Good lay explanation, thank you.
I have a sock puppet acct on Twit 😁. Then tension has become unbelievable within what is supposed to the same side. I could see the insidious shift of many distracting from important issues, such as GOF and DURC for a long while. In most cases they stopped even focusing on fighting against terrible "countermeasures" ie, lockdowns, masking, vaccines, mandates, as the focus seeming become about attacking others that don't hold their views and recruiting to their views. I SO appreciate you standing your ground and continuing to talk about the real issues which is what will keep the "bad guys" from getting away with having done this, instead of pretending their is no "this". Jessica's article is a great compliment with this one.
Yes it seemed artificial when they started attacking Malone, Kory and Rose instead of the real perpetrators of the crimes we have witnessed over the last 4 years.
The most they could possible accuse (that is, claim without good evidence) that group of is being sucked in to the ponzi scheme at various levels. Wow. What a crime. So let's just ignore Bourla, Sunak, Johnson, Biden, Trump, Fauci, Rasmussen, Farrar, Holmes, Dwyer, Shi, Field, Andersen, Bedford (yeah this is just off the top of my head).
Yes let's give THOSE people a free pass and make sure we go after Malone Kory and Rose.
Great work, glowies.
I appreciate your work but don’t agree with you on this. People like Kory, Kirsch, Malone, etc., to the extent they helped build the narrative of a very dangerous pandemic virus, were instrumental in enabling the success of the kill shots, where the real damage is ongoing. By way of anecdotal support, as I read this article last night paramedics with full lights flashing arrived on my street to take the neighbor’s son-in-law to the hospital for “heart issues.”
You believe Jessica Rose and Pierre Kory enabled the success of the shots?
What is wrong with you people?
Thank you once again! (And...the frankenstein-virus' release was timely coordinated to assist in stealing an election...and test the global power grab!) Evil abounds.
Thank you for helping to make these complex issues a bit easier to understand. Well done. Thank also for stepping up and doing what is right in the face of intense opposition. Kudos. I wanted to mention that it appears you have a typo in your headline.
Thanks for the heads up. I saw and changed it in the media post section, but forgot to update it in the article! You have no idea how irritating they are!
Ditto Mark’s “thank you “ !
Keep up the good fight- the war is not coming, it’s already here……
And after all that, the lab creation is relatively innocuous. The hospital murder protocols, however, are very effective and terminal