Very nice analysis. You did that using government flawed date and didn’t even consider the vaccine adverse reactions. It truly amazes me how people who apparently have nothing to gain defend this injection for pregnant women and by doing so put their reputations on the line. I guess they think if the vaccines are harmful and useless it s…
Very nice analysis. You did that using government flawed date and didn’t even consider the vaccine adverse reactions. It truly amazes me how people who apparently have nothing to gain defend this injection for pregnant women and by doing so put their reputations on the line. I guess they think if the vaccines are harmful and useless it somehow damages the prestige of their academic class, which shows how useless universities have become these days.
Yes I used their own data - V-safe, UKHSA and UKOSS. If they want to challenge the assumptions in the data they need to ensure that all those data sets are opened to inspection.
The people trying to counter this produce a lot of hot air and a number of retrospective data sets which are heavily subject to selection biases.
Very nice analysis. You did that using government flawed date and didn’t even consider the vaccine adverse reactions. It truly amazes me how people who apparently have nothing to gain defend this injection for pregnant women and by doing so put their reputations on the line. I guess they think if the vaccines are harmful and useless it somehow damages the prestige of their academic class, which shows how useless universities have become these days.
Yes I used their own data - V-safe, UKHSA and UKOSS. If they want to challenge the assumptions in the data they need to ensure that all those data sets are opened to inspection.
The people trying to counter this produce a lot of hot air and a number of retrospective data sets which are heavily subject to selection biases.