And why don’t more people world wide recognize that governments everywhere are/have been manipulating and disappearing data?? Not to mention changing definitions regularly to suit their needs….as we know—- something larger is afoot….
Jul 8, 2022·edited Jul 8, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
The same tactics are used in New Zealand. All the players are in lockstep. I know they run for cover when the heat goes on. One of my colleagues over here questioned the NZ government uses of per centages to describe hospitalisations. The Government would say things like, "15% of people in hospital with a positive Covid test are unvaccinated, or ineligible, yet they comprise only 3% of the population, so you are 5 times more likely to be hospitalised".
One problem though, a simple check of population data from the government website showed that there were 15% of the population unvaccinated, not 3%. It appears the government were using an innacurate population source. So what happened when my friend pointed this out? Well first of all they stopped comparing per centages and then they stopped quoting per centages at all. Rather, you had to figure them out for yourself. Well, guess what, as of the last week, new hospital admissions for the unvaccinated and ineligible has dropped to just over 9% when you do the sums AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SAYING A THING. Yes, they have been caught red handed.
And the biggest cover up is the classification of cause of death. People may not realise, but dying with Covid does not mean dying from Covid. About two-thirds (quoting the Northern regions Manager, here) of hospitalised people who are Covid positive, did not admit to hospital because of Covid. This way they can stack old people dying with Covid in the unvaccinated category. Many of them did not not die of Covid, but rather from underlying conditions, like old age. All it needs is a corrupted doctor to complete a death certificate saying the person died with Covid. Even with that sleight of hand, they cannot hide the rising number of fully jabbed people dying with Covid, which is now close to 90 %. The other 10 % are the unvaccinated, or ineleigible. And of course there is the old trick of creating an "undervaccinated" category, wherein you can add those who have had two doses, but that second dose was 7 days, or less before their testing date and they died within 28 days of testing. In other words, you can die 35 days after the second jab and still be classified as undervaccinated.
Fellow kiwi here, they've scrapped the MOH vax infection/hospitalization stats on RNZ, which was showing boosted 4x more prone to infection, no difference in hospitalization (some days negative protection). You can use "The way back machine" website to find the old data directly from MOH to work out a bunch of key stats.
When I was looking through it, around April they had around 550 deaths where only 50 were "from covid," insane stuff! Now it's more 45% "from"
They also took out half of v hospitalization as incidental, and only took out 20% for unvaxed, but I make hospitalization stats compared to the injured graphs and that just made the comparison way worse, now instead of 10K vaxies hospitalized vs 77K v injured. it's now 6k v hospitalized and 77K injured, & severe injuries account for 3.4K, what's the whole point of this public slaughtering?
Also had a look at the 2022 all-cause deaths...basically by 5 months we have 2300 excess, 1200 covid deaths, half are incidental so that's 600, covidians like to use OD (37/yr) or suicide (600/yr), say suicide and OD doubled in 5 months, we are looking at 1400 excess ie 14% excess, some years the worst excess was 10%, so conservatively still a 4% excess, and more likely 17%, somewhere in between is still a horror show.
I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the NSW excess deaths graph too, they literally drew the act of crime out for everyone to see, red john type of stuff
We know the MOH are a pack of bastards. On what basis did they decide to halve the vaxxed hospital admissions? We are supposed to trust government funded hospital administrators who intransparently decided that half the vaxxed who tested positive for Covid, were not admitted due to Covid, but only 18% of the unvaxxed met that criteria. But if they die within 28 days of that test they must be classified as a Covid death in order to comp.y with International monitoring definitions. And as Guy Hatchard has pointed out, if all these vaxxed didn't go to hospital and die of Covid, then what did they die of? The MOH wont disclose it even though they have the means to link the vaccination status of All deaths. They won't do it because, like in the UK, the vaccinated makeup a disproportionate percentage of all the deaths.
But one thing they can't hide and that's All Cause Mortality. I'm watching it like a Hawk. We are 2000 up this year on last year and its climbing each week. Covid "deaths" have been down a little since April, below 100 per week, but a bg 139 W/E 10th July, but stiil not enough to account for the 2000 extra.
Where do you get your injured figures from?
Also, over the weekend, 40 out of 43 Covid deaths were in fully vaxed, 34 of them boosted. But strangely, there were no admissions to ICU, despite 62 fully vaxxed being hospitalised out of a total 69. That means all these vaxxed people are not even getting to ICU before dying and 65% of the hospitalised died, compared to 42% of the unvaxxed hospitalised.
Great post, thanks. Proves this kleptocratic ruling force will stop at nothing to skew anything, including statistics, to prove their points. They’re losing now and they know it. What is their next “logical” - if there is a logical for this bunch - move?
I watched a video on Twitter of people bringing their children to get jabbed in NYC. The group outside were trying to stop them by asking the parents "for just five minutes of their time. You can still get this done, but please give me five minutes of your time. Once you do this you cannot undo it". It was heart wrenching because NOBODY would give them five minutes of their time.
Jul 8, 2022·edited Jul 8, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
That mob are most embarrassing. I might drop off next week a hard copy of this in his electoral office in Pittwater Rd Dee Why. Small world. I’ll need sunnies and a mask, should I wear a hoodie?
Nice article explaining the context. NSW data looks particularly ominous. Most of the pro-vaccine activists on Twitter usually go quiet and move on when it’s mentioned. I suppose holding their nose and doubling down is all they’ve got left at this point.
I forward the email of this post of yours to my 140 unrequited Aussie pollies and "experts". Both yahoo and gmail put my mails into permanent quarantine since I received no auto replies. So I sent just the link with my own headline, it went in like Flynn!
How can you fight against these evil governments who are willing to lie and falsify data? It also hurts that the masses refuse to believe it is happening. So depressing.
Jul 9, 2022·edited Jul 9, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Excellent work. I'm confused about the unknown group, though. Who are they likely to be? What is their likely vaxx status? Some of them are surely unvaxxed, are they not?
Some yes but the AIR is very hit and miss. In theory all these people should be able to be linked via their Medicare number but the systems are much more unreliable than you would think
I know I'm late to this but I believe they try to link to the AIR on 1st name, last name and DOB and have to get an exact match on all three. There's no legislative basis that allows sharing/joining data on Medicare number between the Feds and NSW Health
Thank you for this article. I'm in the process of debating a government troll in New Zealand and "it" pulled out the NSW reports you mention, as proof, from a reliable, international source, that the vaccines were very effective. The person could ba an AI bot because it never really answers my questions, or disputes my data, instead it jumps to other sources. One huge error in their argument is to base their conclusions on case numbers. We'll, given that the vast majority of true anti-vaxxers don't submit a result means they are understated in case data.
They are also a higher proportion of the population than the what is presented in the data.
You've discovered the purpose of the NSW and UKHSA data sets, the only two data sets in the English speaking world that overtly declared data by vaccination status. They were to validate the public health interventions. When they started showing the opposite (that the public health interventions were harmful) they stopped reporting them.
Yes. They made some pretty bold claims about vaccine efficacy. Of course, AI, or the NZ government troll, could only back to July 2022 to find supporting data from NSW. Perhaps I now know why. Do you know if their data showing the negative efficacy of the jab is still available? When I tried opening links to their report it came up with an error.
NZ provide only hospital and ICU admissions due to Covid, by Vax status. They then show Deaths, within 28-days of testing positive by Vax status, but given 30-35% of these are not due to Covid, it's impossible to tease out true Covid deaths against Vax status. Apart from the recent whistleblower release, the NZ MOH, will not release the Vax status of All-cause mortality. We wonder why?
Whar Data do we need to show a signal? They, NZ MOH, have the data, but will not release it. If we have a true inquiry, the data may come out under FOI.
And why don’t more people world wide recognize that governments everywhere are/have been manipulating and disappearing data?? Not to mention changing definitions regularly to suit their needs….as we know—- something larger is afoot….
Once you capture the doctors and regulators the rest is easy
Even when it's pointed out to them, they will defend the "experts" and the actions of the glorious leaders / authorities.
I suspect, that as they have taken the poison, they will never want to be shown the reality that they have taken the poison.
It's happened for millennia, hasn't it?
The same tactics are used in New Zealand. All the players are in lockstep. I know they run for cover when the heat goes on. One of my colleagues over here questioned the NZ government uses of per centages to describe hospitalisations. The Government would say things like, "15% of people in hospital with a positive Covid test are unvaccinated, or ineligible, yet they comprise only 3% of the population, so you are 5 times more likely to be hospitalised".
One problem though, a simple check of population data from the government website showed that there were 15% of the population unvaccinated, not 3%. It appears the government were using an innacurate population source. So what happened when my friend pointed this out? Well first of all they stopped comparing per centages and then they stopped quoting per centages at all. Rather, you had to figure them out for yourself. Well, guess what, as of the last week, new hospital admissions for the unvaccinated and ineligible has dropped to just over 9% when you do the sums AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT SAYING A THING. Yes, they have been caught red handed.
And the biggest cover up is the classification of cause of death. People may not realise, but dying with Covid does not mean dying from Covid. About two-thirds (quoting the Northern regions Manager, here) of hospitalised people who are Covid positive, did not admit to hospital because of Covid. This way they can stack old people dying with Covid in the unvaccinated category. Many of them did not not die of Covid, but rather from underlying conditions, like old age. All it needs is a corrupted doctor to complete a death certificate saying the person died with Covid. Even with that sleight of hand, they cannot hide the rising number of fully jabbed people dying with Covid, which is now close to 90 %. The other 10 % are the unvaccinated, or ineleigible. And of course there is the old trick of creating an "undervaccinated" category, wherein you can add those who have had two doses, but that second dose was 7 days, or less before their testing date and they died within 28 days of testing. In other words, you can die 35 days after the second jab and still be classified as undervaccinated.
At least in NZ, they care about being caught red handed. In the USA they do not give a shit and keep on lying despite being exposed.
That's part of Mass Formation Psychosis. They are hypnotized and must stay they, rather than face reality.
Fellow kiwi here, they've scrapped the MOH vax infection/hospitalization stats on RNZ, which was showing boosted 4x more prone to infection, no difference in hospitalization (some days negative protection). You can use "The way back machine" website to find the old data directly from MOH to work out a bunch of key stats.
When I was looking through it, around April they had around 550 deaths where only 50 were "from covid," insane stuff! Now it's more 45% "from"
They also took out half of v hospitalization as incidental, and only took out 20% for unvaxed, but I make hospitalization stats compared to the injured graphs and that just made the comparison way worse, now instead of 10K vaxies hospitalized vs 77K v injured. it's now 6k v hospitalized and 77K injured, & severe injuries account for 3.4K, what's the whole point of this public slaughtering?
Also had a look at the 2022 all-cause deaths...basically by 5 months we have 2300 excess, 1200 covid deaths, half are incidental so that's 600, covidians like to use OD (37/yr) or suicide (600/yr), say suicide and OD doubled in 5 months, we are looking at 1400 excess ie 14% excess, some years the worst excess was 10%, so conservatively still a 4% excess, and more likely 17%, somewhere in between is still a horror show.
I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the NSW excess deaths graph too, they literally drew the act of crime out for everyone to see, red john type of stuff
We know the MOH are a pack of bastards. On what basis did they decide to halve the vaxxed hospital admissions? We are supposed to trust government funded hospital administrators who intransparently decided that half the vaxxed who tested positive for Covid, were not admitted due to Covid, but only 18% of the unvaxxed met that criteria. But if they die within 28 days of that test they must be classified as a Covid death in order to comp.y with International monitoring definitions. And as Guy Hatchard has pointed out, if all these vaxxed didn't go to hospital and die of Covid, then what did they die of? The MOH wont disclose it even though they have the means to link the vaccination status of All deaths. They won't do it because, like in the UK, the vaccinated makeup a disproportionate percentage of all the deaths.
But one thing they can't hide and that's All Cause Mortality. I'm watching it like a Hawk. We are 2000 up this year on last year and its climbing each week. Covid "deaths" have been down a little since April, below 100 per week, but a bg 139 W/E 10th July, but stiil not enough to account for the 2000 extra.
Where do you get your injured figures from?
Also, over the weekend, 40 out of 43 Covid deaths were in fully vaxed, 34 of them boosted. But strangely, there were no admissions to ICU, despite 62 fully vaxxed being hospitalised out of a total 69. That means all these vaxxed people are not even getting to ICU before dying and 65% of the hospitalised died, compared to 42% of the unvaxxed hospitalised.
The death numbers is doing pretty bad lol, @avocato_bob on twitter doing those pie graphs
I got the injury figures from Medsafe, https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/vaccine-report-overview.asp
Go to their dashboard then scroll to the very bottom to download the excel file, it shows 77K whereas the open dashboard was in the 60Ks
With MOH data I use way back machine website to calculate the data there, RNZ one is gone but MOH we still have the evidence
The mouse army lives on!
https://twitter.com/ichudov/status/1545443660506058755
Thanks Ivor!
DON'T tell el pusso gato malo!
The cat and the mouse are friends in this realm...
Great post, thanks. Proves this kleptocratic ruling force will stop at nothing to skew anything, including statistics, to prove their points. They’re losing now and they know it. What is their next “logical” - if there is a logical for this bunch - move?
I watched a video on Twitter of people bringing their children to get jabbed in NYC. The group outside were trying to stop them by asking the parents "for just five minutes of their time. You can still get this done, but please give me five minutes of your time. Once you do this you cannot undo it". It was heart wrenching because NOBODY would give them five minutes of their time.
It would involve giving protesters 5 minutes of their brain, which they do not have
I reckon you've got about 12 seconds to get anything in.
The average screen switch on a TV show is 6 sec. "Feed" based attention is even shorter.
“Here’s the deal: Unvaccinated individuals are 97 times more likely to die compared to those who are boosted.” President Biden, 5 Feb 2022
The tweet is still up. This data manipulation and lies are a worldwide phenomena.
https://twitter.com/potus/status/1490086336971386880?s=21
That mob are most embarrassing. I might drop off next week a hard copy of this in his electoral office in Pittwater Rd Dee Why. Small world. I’ll need sunnies and a mask, should I wear a hoodie?
Nice article explaining the context. NSW data looks particularly ominous. Most of the pro-vaccine activists on Twitter usually go quiet and move on when it’s mentioned. I suppose holding their nose and doubling down is all they’ve got left at this point.
I just dare them to take another one lol
Dr Ican'tsee,
I forward the email of this post of yours to my 140 unrequited Aussie pollies and "experts". Both yahoo and gmail put my mails into permanent quarantine since I received no auto replies. So I sent just the link with my own headline, it went in like Flynn!
Arkancide... It's a long running joke. But also matches I can't say it. Google is evil
Thanks.
I will send it off to about 140 Aussie pollies and "experts", including Dr Chant.
How can you fight against these evil governments who are willing to lie and falsify data? It also hurts that the masses refuse to believe it is happening. So depressing.
We use all means that are moral and legal. It starts with self, and moves on from there. Everyone matters, and therefore every little bit helps.
Great article Dr Syed. I've referenced your work in my latest report on NSW hospitalisations. https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/03-of-nsw-covid-hospitalisations
The cover up now in print.
Great post.
Will stupid wake?
Excellent work. I'm confused about the unknown group, though. Who are they likely to be? What is their likely vaxx status? Some of them are surely unvaxxed, are they not?
Some yes but the AIR is very hit and miss. In theory all these people should be able to be linked via their Medicare number but the systems are much more unreliable than you would think
I know I'm late to this but I believe they try to link to the AIR on 1st name, last name and DOB and have to get an exact match on all three. There's no legislative basis that allows sharing/joining data on Medicare number between the Feds and NSW Health
That's actually a comfort. I've been operating under the premise "the gov't pays, the gov't knows all." but I forgot the incompetent part.
It's a Holocaust.
Thank you for this article. I'm in the process of debating a government troll in New Zealand and "it" pulled out the NSW reports you mention, as proof, from a reliable, international source, that the vaccines were very effective. The person could ba an AI bot because it never really answers my questions, or disputes my data, instead it jumps to other sources. One huge error in their argument is to base their conclusions on case numbers. We'll, given that the vast majority of true anti-vaxxers don't submit a result means they are understated in case data.
They are also a higher proportion of the population than the what is presented in the data.
You've discovered the purpose of the NSW and UKHSA data sets, the only two data sets in the English speaking world that overtly declared data by vaccination status. They were to validate the public health interventions. When they started showing the opposite (that the public health interventions were harmful) they stopped reporting them.
Yes. They made some pretty bold claims about vaccine efficacy. Of course, AI, or the NZ government troll, could only back to July 2022 to find supporting data from NSW. Perhaps I now know why. Do you know if their data showing the negative efficacy of the jab is still available? When I tried opening links to their report it came up with an error.
I downloaded a lot of the NSW reports at the time exactly for that reason. I haven't seen the NZ reports. You should ask for them via FOI
NZ provide only hospital and ICU admissions due to Covid, by Vax status. They then show Deaths, within 28-days of testing positive by Vax status, but given 30-35% of these are not due to Covid, it's impossible to tease out true Covid deaths against Vax status. Apart from the recent whistleblower release, the NZ MOH, will not release the Vax status of All-cause mortality. We wonder why?
They only released the "whistleblower" data because it didn't show anything
Whar Data do we need to show a signal? They, NZ MOH, have the data, but will not release it. If we have a true inquiry, the data may come out under FOI.