It was really disgraceful form. The impression I got is that the ones in the chamber who were complaining about his speech must have thought he's a mad anti-vaxxer and therefore they put their hands over their ears and won't listen. For someone to provide scientific argument in parliament is abhorrent to them. They don't want to listen t…
It was really disgraceful form. The impression I got is that the ones in the chamber who were complaining about his speech must have thought he's a mad anti-vaxxer and therefore they put their hands over their ears and won't listen. For someone to provide scientific argument in parliament is abhorrent to them. They don't want to listen to any reporting on data. You would think the sensible approach would be to listen with dignity and then vote down.
It was really disgraceful form. The impression I got is that the ones in the chamber who were complaining about his speech must have thought he's a mad anti-vaxxer and therefore they put their hands over their ears and won't listen. For someone to provide scientific argument in parliament is abhorrent to them. They don't want to listen to any reporting on data. You would think the sensible approach would be to listen with dignity and then vote down.