Correct. I would hate to think that, having access to the later data in June when they published, they had advance knowledge of the upcoming rates and consciously or subconsciously made a calculation that was in keeping with the later raw data that they had in front of them
Correct. I would hate to think that, having access to the later data in June when they published, they had advance knowledge of the upcoming rates and consciously or subconsciously made a calculation that was in keeping with the later raw data that they had in front of them
Confirmation bias on the part of good actors ?? Possible …. But birth rates have plummeted. What about all the high misscairage rates and still births we have heard about from nurses and OBGYNS?
Correct. I would hate to think that, having access to the later data in June when they published, they had advance knowledge of the upcoming rates and consciously or subconsciously made a calculation that was in keeping with the later raw data that they had in front of them
Confirmation bias on the part of good actors ?? Possible …. But birth rates have plummeted. What about all the high misscairage rates and still births we have heard about from nurses and OBGYNS?