Pfizer and the regulators had data by June 2021 showing a serious safety signal for miscarriage. They not only ignored it but suppressed access to the documents.
Last time I looked at the UK Pharmacy Guild (or whatever it is called) website, it referred to the thalidomide tragedy as a terrible mistake that never happened before or since - talk about whitewashing history.
I keep saying it, but it staggers me that the jab was pushed on pregnant women, or on anyone without understanding what impact it could have on fertility. Pfizer et al were calling for participants in fertility trials whilst it was being actively given to men and women of childbearing age. Criminal does not cover it.
My daughter was nursing her baby when everyone was begging her to get the "vaccine" I told her to WAIT...do not inject this experimental drug into your bloodstream (yes, I knew it didn't stay in the muscle), she asked her NATUROPATH who told her, "It's probably safe" (!!!!) So she did it. Only 2 thank God. I emailed her naturopathic doctor and told him he had no right telling her that. NO studies.
If there had been no trials or studies, it would not have mattered. Actually the trials were a big joke and never true RCT's that were completed.
As I understand it, under the EUA, the DOD and HHS coded this substance in it's contracts with the drug companies, as a prototype countermeasure that was undefined for any specific purpose and thus was not considered a pharmaceutical product. This required no studies or testing before being made available to the public.
This destructive mRNA based product was said to be a vaccine and it was anything but. It was all a lie from pandemic day 1. Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova have worked diligently to uncover the true basis for this destructive substance. They are on substack.
Excellent article, thank you. There are legions of physicians who should have raised these concerns right from the start, but very few who did. Whether there was an organized, institutional campaign to delegitimize those that did (seems so) or willful agenda-driven bias in the physicians themselves (also possible), those that did not failed in their duty to protect patients and should face consequences.
I understand your frustration and anger. Imagine being in the group and watching your colleagues abandon the people and sneer at them. What I will say and have said before is that I am equally frustrated that the public did very little. No complaints to the regulators about conduct of doctors pushing gene therapies as vaccines, no protests at AHPRA or the TGA. No complaints to AHPRA about AHPRA's conduct. No criminal complaints. We were basically left to fight all the institutions alone. Not possible.
Fantastic article Doctor. Thanks for explaining things in clear detail for non-medical types like myself.
My wife was pregnant throughout 2021, giving birth just before Christmas. The pressure to get vaccinated was severe, to say the least (we live in Melbourne). In the end we resisted the pressure and had a healthy baby girl, though I lost my job around the same time. Oh well, we're lucky enough to have some savings.
I've commented on one of Igor's articles that the UKHSA data showing the reduction in births can be approximated by assuming between a 2 to about 2.5 increase in the miscarriage rate, depending on what the baseline miscarriage rate is.
Also, we're still waiting on Pfizer to publish their data from the vaccine in pregnancy trial, where they only dared have 175 women in each arm, and only injected during the 3rd trimester. Or perhaps they had trouble finding women who were still unvaccinated who were happy to get the jab post trial per the protocol.
Thanks for that. I took a look at the article and the email is interesting. "Continuation of this placebo controlled study could no longer be justified"....as if following 350 women for 6 months post birth is an imposition for a multi-multi-billion dollar company like pfizer. But they do "plan to complete the analysis of the clinical trial C4591015 and share it with global public health regulators". "Plan" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, but sounds like we could still expect something from pfizer.
Anyway I'm still asking Viki how the trial is going, with no reply. :)
If you had asked me 3 years ago if a mouse army would have been my heroes I would have laughed. Thank you to everyone of you producing information that those out of depth can understand. Thank goodness the TGA is on the ball and recalled all cough medicines, one can only assume Pharma forgot to pay the bill or have they got a new vaccine that works better?
The amount of hours of research that goes into all this information is huge, it's very humbling that people are prepared to do this amount of work to help others understand the enormity of this deception
“Be sure not to eat fish that might contain mercury. Here, take this experimental gene therapy (to protect you—just kidding—from a 99% survivable illness you may have previous immunity to).”
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." —Albert Einstein
It's not difficult to see what's happened here. They say there's nothing to see with a miscarriage rate of 16.4% which is within or possibly even lower than the normal rate if you include from conception to six weeks when the vast majority of miscarriages occur. What's not normal is a miscarriage rate of 16.4% post-ultrasound confirmation (ie usually after at least 6 weeks when a woman has missed a period, sat and fretted for a few days, gone and done an at-home pregnancy test and then made a docs appointment to go get an ultrasound). By that point, six weeks in, the rate of miscarriage has drops to between 5 & 10% depending on what study you read.
Confirming the method of diagnosis required for inclusion in study and then you need IPD with dates of diagnosis and estimated gestational age at date of diagnosis.
If, as is likely, most of the estimated gestational ages are +6 weeks at time of inclusion then a subsequent miscarriage rate of 16.4% for those vaccinated in that first trimester is a giant red flag.
You do numbers, I try to do words based on a low opinion of my own comprehension skills. I ask 'how can I write this so a thick person (me) can understand it.'
As I say, it's the IPD that would put this to bed. What was the method of pregnancy diagnosis required for inclusion and what were the gestational ages at the point of inclusion, vaccination and miscarriage.
I'm wondering if this data will be in the data Pfizer was forced to make public?
Of the first 100 suspected adverse reaction reports received by the TGA from pregnant women who had received a covid shot, in the 'Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions' category, 82 were reports of miscarriages! How did the TGA respond to this very alarming safety signal? They didn’t, they ignored it.
The corruption of data, in order to obfuscate and hide harm, is a pervasive and persistent tactic.
Just recently the UK ONS released general mortality data by vaccination status. Renowned British mathematician, Norman Fenton, has declared the data is grossly in 'error'. The ONS has doubled the harm to the unvaccinated cohort by simply halving the proportion of population declared unvaccinated.
If Pfizer mRNA is incorporated in hepatic cells in vitro, and IF it happens in vivo...and chimera are routinely created...and women are born with all the eggs they have in a lifetime...and IF it happens to their eggs...are their children even human?
A better question is due to the accumulation of LNPs and mRNA spikes in the ovaries; will those daughters of the vaccinated even be able to have children? Are their eggs being damaged but we won’t know for several generations like DES?
Well… I know women who have been vaccinated and successfully had what appear to be normal babies but we don’t know what the impact of the vaccine is on the generation after this one. It’s a good bioweapon if you trash the current birth rates with the vaccine but it’s a very good bioweapon if you sterilize the next generation. The cabal that did this will be long gone, their Ill-gotten billions lost to time and humanity could be looking at a “Children of Men” situation for the vaccinated and their descendants within a generation.
Yes, I too know women who have been vaccinated and successfully had what appear to be normal babies. We just don’t know what proportion of those babies, or rather the female ones, are sterile.
I hadn't thought of that. It's a good question. It would be good to start with if we could determine whether or not Pfizer are sterilising future generations of females in the womb. Then we could get a more receptive audience among the bureaucrats for your question. Is there any way, apart from waiting for 20 years, by which we can determine if the females are born sterile?
Not at this point, but at some point if children are having blood tests for other things or biopsies it would be possible theoretically to test for that spike gene sequence
More on the Multiple Pfizer Trials studying Pregnancy, from which they produced the data you show, and refused to give to Maryanne Demasi, even denied it was available.
Thanks Geoff will add to article. It's interesting too that there were more placebo participants than vaccine participants in the pregnancy exposures report from C4591001 which should be a randomised trial. Red flag for early failure to implant
I suspect that some pregnant women might have been unblinded early. Data crunching nerds including OpenVaet are currently looking for urine test results in the XPT files.
Last time I looked at the UK Pharmacy Guild (or whatever it is called) website, it referred to the thalidomide tragedy as a terrible mistake that never happened before or since - talk about whitewashing history.
I keep saying it, but it staggers me that the jab was pushed on pregnant women, or on anyone without understanding what impact it could have on fertility. Pfizer et al were calling for participants in fertility trials whilst it was being actively given to men and women of childbearing age. Criminal does not cover it.
My daughter was nursing her baby when everyone was begging her to get the "vaccine" I told her to WAIT...do not inject this experimental drug into your bloodstream (yes, I knew it didn't stay in the muscle), she asked her NATUROPATH who told her, "It's probably safe" (!!!!) So she did it. Only 2 thank God. I emailed her naturopathic doctor and told him he had no right telling her that. NO studies.
I’ve known babies S that died after nursing from a newly jabbed mom
It probably doesn’t count as a miscarriage because she was 9 months along, but sometimes the loss kills the mom too.
My friend’s daughter suffered a placenta abruption in her 9th month and lost the baby and bled to death.
My friend lost her daughter and infant grandson at the same time. And her husband and small children lost their mom and wife.
This is criminal.
I have heard reports of an increased rate of abruption but we have to wait for hospital episode stats to see if it is reported
Hey Doc can we get some hospital episode stats for this? No community covid transmission in WA likely covid naive population, massive jab rollout and hospital demand was so high that they had to cancel surgeries and ambulance ramping out of control. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-30/elective-surgery-postponed-wa-hospital-covid/100417518
So horrible! I’m so sorry! That is pretty rare.
I'm so sorry...
If there had been no trials or studies, it would not have mattered. Actually the trials were a big joke and never true RCT's that were completed.
As I understand it, under the EUA, the DOD and HHS coded this substance in it's contracts with the drug companies, as a prototype countermeasure that was undefined for any specific purpose and thus was not considered a pharmaceutical product. This required no studies or testing before being made available to the public.
This destructive mRNA based product was said to be a vaccine and it was anything but. It was all a lie from pandemic day 1. Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova have worked diligently to uncover the true basis for this destructive substance. They are on substack.
Bioweapons...
Excellent article, thank you. There are legions of physicians who should have raised these concerns right from the start, but very few who did. Whether there was an organized, institutional campaign to delegitimize those that did (seems so) or willful agenda-driven bias in the physicians themselves (also possible), those that did not failed in their duty to protect patients and should face consequences.
I understand your frustration and anger. Imagine being in the group and watching your colleagues abandon the people and sneer at them. What I will say and have said before is that I am equally frustrated that the public did very little. No complaints to the regulators about conduct of doctors pushing gene therapies as vaccines, no protests at AHPRA or the TGA. No complaints to AHPRA about AHPRA's conduct. No criminal complaints. We were basically left to fight all the institutions alone. Not possible.
Fantastic article Doctor. Thanks for explaining things in clear detail for non-medical types like myself.
My wife was pregnant throughout 2021, giving birth just before Christmas. The pressure to get vaccinated was severe, to say the least (we live in Melbourne). In the end we resisted the pressure and had a healthy baby girl, though I lost my job around the same time. Oh well, we're lucky enough to have some savings.
I've commented on one of Igor's articles that the UKHSA data showing the reduction in births can be approximated by assuming between a 2 to about 2.5 increase in the miscarriage rate, depending on what the baseline miscarriage rate is.
Also, we're still waiting on Pfizer to publish their data from the vaccine in pregnancy trial, where they only dared have 175 women in each arm, and only injected during the 3rd trimester. Or perhaps they had trouble finding women who were still unvaccinated who were happy to get the jab post trial per the protocol.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04754594
Believe that’s the trial that has since been scrapped mentioned in Maryanne’s article
Thanks for that. I took a look at the article and the email is interesting. "Continuation of this placebo controlled study could no longer be justified"....as if following 350 women for 6 months post birth is an imposition for a multi-multi-billion dollar company like pfizer. But they do "plan to complete the analysis of the clinical trial C4591015 and share it with global public health regulators". "Plan" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, but sounds like we could still expect something from pfizer.
Anyway I'm still asking Viki how the trial is going, with no reply. :)
Simple rule: Do not use alcohol or tobacco when pregnant. Whoops forgot most pharmaceuticals and and mandated JABS.
If you had asked me 3 years ago if a mouse army would have been my heroes I would have laughed. Thank you to everyone of you producing information that those out of depth can understand. Thank goodness the TGA is on the ball and recalled all cough medicines, one can only assume Pharma forgot to pay the bill or have they got a new vaccine that works better?
The amount of hours of research that goes into all this information is huge, it's very humbling that people are prepared to do this amount of work to help others understand the enormity of this deception
Thanks Jac much appreciated that you appreciate it!
“Be sure not to eat fish that might contain mercury. Here, take this experimental gene therapy (to protect you—just kidding—from a 99% survivable illness you may have previous immunity to).”
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." —Albert Einstein
It's not difficult to see what's happened here. They say there's nothing to see with a miscarriage rate of 16.4% which is within or possibly even lower than the normal rate if you include from conception to six weeks when the vast majority of miscarriages occur. What's not normal is a miscarriage rate of 16.4% post-ultrasound confirmation (ie usually after at least 6 weeks when a woman has missed a period, sat and fretted for a few days, gone and done an at-home pregnancy test and then made a docs appointment to go get an ultrasound). By that point, six weeks in, the rate of miscarriage has drops to between 5 & 10% depending on what study you read.
Confirming the method of diagnosis required for inclusion in study and then you need IPD with dates of diagnosis and estimated gestational age at date of diagnosis.
If, as is likely, most of the estimated gestational ages are +6 weeks at time of inclusion then a subsequent miscarriage rate of 16.4% for those vaccinated in that first trimester is a giant red flag.
Thank you Jay, you put it better than me!
You do numbers, I try to do words based on a low opinion of my own comprehension skills. I ask 'how can I write this so a thick person (me) can understand it.'
As I say, it's the IPD that would put this to bed. What was the method of pregnancy diagnosis required for inclusion and what were the gestational ages at the point of inclusion, vaccination and miscarriage.
I'm wondering if this data will be in the data Pfizer was forced to make public?
Of the first 100 suspected adverse reaction reports received by the TGA from pregnant women who had received a covid shot, in the 'Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions' category, 82 were reports of miscarriages! How did the TGA respond to this very alarming safety signal? They didn’t, they ignored it.
The corruption of data, in order to obfuscate and hide harm, is a pervasive and persistent tactic.
Just recently the UK ONS released general mortality data by vaccination status. Renowned British mathematician, Norman Fenton, has declared the data is grossly in 'error'. The ONS has doubled the harm to the unvaccinated cohort by simply halving the proportion of population declared unvaccinated.
These are not errors. They are criminal acts.
Fantastic work
Stunning and needs to be read in a court room !
What are the mRNA vaccines doing to the female foetus? Are those females born sterile?
If Pfizer mRNA is incorporated in hepatic cells in vitro, and IF it happens in vivo...and chimera are routinely created...and women are born with all the eggs they have in a lifetime...and IF it happens to their eggs...are their children even human?
A better question is due to the accumulation of LNPs and mRNA spikes in the ovaries; will those daughters of the vaccinated even be able to have children? Are their eggs being damaged but we won’t know for several generations like DES?
If they've been sterilised in the womb they won't be able to have children.
Well… I know women who have been vaccinated and successfully had what appear to be normal babies but we don’t know what the impact of the vaccine is on the generation after this one. It’s a good bioweapon if you trash the current birth rates with the vaccine but it’s a very good bioweapon if you sterilize the next generation. The cabal that did this will be long gone, their Ill-gotten billions lost to time and humanity could be looking at a “Children of Men” situation for the vaccinated and their descendants within a generation.
Yes, I too know women who have been vaccinated and successfully had what appear to be normal babies. We just don’t know what proportion of those babies, or rather the female ones, are sterile.
I hadn't thought of that. It's a good question. It would be good to start with if we could determine whether or not Pfizer are sterilising future generations of females in the womb. Then we could get a more receptive audience among the bureaucrats for your question. Is there any way, apart from waiting for 20 years, by which we can determine if the females are born sterile?
Not at this point, but at some point if children are having blood tests for other things or biopsies it would be possible theoretically to test for that spike gene sequence
Are gene sequences in the jabbed????????????????
Yes. Castriuta et al
Brilliant work once again.
More on the Multiple Pfizer Trials studying Pregnancy, from which they produced the data you show, and refused to give to Maryanne Demasi, even denied it was available.
Note the ongoing Teratology Human Trial.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-biontech-covid19-jab-multiple
Thanks Geoff will add to article. It's interesting too that there were more placebo participants than vaccine participants in the pregnancy exposures report from C4591001 which should be a randomised trial. Red flag for early failure to implant
I suspect that some pregnant women might have been unblinded early. Data crunching nerds including OpenVaet are currently looking for urine test results in the XPT files.
That was the protocol and also they should have been withdrawn. That means that pregnant women in the trial should not have received a second dose.
If openvaet finds the HCG or PT test column in the xpt let me know!