At least one federal case has asked the courts to rule on the Myriad case precedent on patent law (35 USC 101) as it relates to mRNA injections, with respect to the 13th Amendment prohibiting slavery.
The DOD didn’t address the issue in its replies to the plaintiff, and as far as I know the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals hasn’t ruled on the case yet. It’s Robert v. Austin, filed by Attorney Todd Callender and his team.
Callender has been raising the alarm about Myriad, the shots, and chattel ownership of humans by patent holders (which include the corporations but also the US government) for awhile.
Also noteworthy: In 2011, Congress tried to prohibit issuing of patents “directed to or encompassing a human organism,” through the 2011 Act to Amend Title 35, United States Code, to Provide for Patent Reform at Section 33.
At some point, in some of these cases, there will be a direct conflict between the Myriad ruling (that organisms with synthetic DNA are the property of the patent-holder) and the 2011 federal law making a carve-out for patents “directed to or encompassing a human organism.”
A human gene code patent holder might have the right to charge an individual for beneficial therapeutic use of the administered therapeutic code but will have no other rights & of course will have criminal liability should things go wrong & extremely serious criminal liability should they fail to prevent passed on code by inheritance or some other mechanism where the recipients of the code gave no informed consent.
Generally, items purchased are owned by the purchaser, not by any patent holders related to the item purchased, ownership of people is illegal.
Generally speaking all artificial gene tampering should be made illegal with a penalty of capital punishment for those found guilty of the offence with a choice of firing squad, hanging or guillotine or being put on a pile of burning timber.
This is horrendous! I knew this when I first saw the patents! People are really idiots! How they don't research some brand new experimental technologies, is beyond me!
I completely remember when the 🐭army discussed this possibility back in January, cause it blew my mind! but it totally make sense, like it totally makes sense your conclusion/prediction. Nothing surprises me anymore... Unfortunately
He wants us all enslaved or dead, and he's got plenty of tragically deluded followers in high places who are more than willing to help him toward that goal.
The Greek word pharmakeia refers to sorcery (and is used in the New Testament).
The universal medical symbol features two serpents and directly references the pagan (false) god hermes.
When you know that the devil is real, Occam's razor cuts completely differently.
The good news is The Good News. The Gospels. Jesus Christ has already won our emancipation and salvation.
This is a very good pick up. I remember reading a patent case early in the cvd crisis when mRNA was being discussed and the idea of recipients of the vaccine becoming the intellectual property of the patent holder. I'll need to search for the article.
a multi-generational defective, dangerous product for which there was fraudulent misrepresentation & zero informed consent … there will be criminal & class action suits when the injured wake up… why anyone would claim ownership of this monstrosity is beyond my comprehension
In the US this would not be the case as ownership of a person is different than an object. The 13th amendment led to the abolition of slavery and indentured servitude outside of penal work
Are you saying that the US supreme court would prohibit any claims to licensure of a person even though they already ruled that patenting human DNA was possible? And this is the same US supreme court that recused themselves from any filings relating to the US 2020 election?
The evil that is being done by the pushers of these genetic shots is incomprehensible for most people. I have no doubt that if they could enforce ownership that they would it’s just I think the legal argument as to the ownership of persons os stretched
Look at it this way....implants aren't YOU. They don't share anything with you except location. You may, or may not, depending on the product, be able to continue without them. Maybe not easily, but possibly. However, your DNA is YOU. You are not you without your DNA. If someone has patented something that is in your DNA at birth, or through transcription, they own that portion of your DNA, without which, you cannot survive, because you cannot live without your DNA (all the cells in your body).
Well if Percy vs Monsanto is a light on this. They actually own the entire genome of the plant that is altered. This only happened in Canada as a result of Patent Law being the forum of Law.
They don't own anything, if the patent owner designed some DNA code & it ends up being an identifiable & unique code snippet in a large number of a person's cells the patent owner has essentially sold to or given the stuff to the person to use like some patented item of special function functional clothing. Now should the person start analysing their DNA & then manufacturing the gene snippet tech for selling to others at work for example the patent owner will have a claim against the patent vilatir for compensation & the like. Ownership of the gmoded person is not possible.
Because the mRNA shots alter the recipient’s DNA, making said recipient a genetically modified organism and, strictly speaking, no longer human. This was evident from publication of the Swedish (I think) some months back that found in vitro DNA alterations post mRNA. This will be adjudicated in the courts eventually.
Changing a person's DNA artificially does not render them not human no matter how we speak about it. If human before being gmoded then human forever. ..
someone commented about the US Constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery which seems to be relevant in negating the ‘human ownership’ argument (humans are not plants)
I remember seeing something similar and thinking it was schizo stuff. But given that the majority of conspiracy theories around the vaccines have come true so far, it now seems plausible.
Wow! Holy fuck! This is simultaneously one of the best and absolute worst articles I’ve ever read. I have felt as though I’ve been trapped inside a sci-fi novel since March 2020, this feels like the breakneck plot twist that smack you in the mouth
👏 👏 👏 My morning wake-up email from Jikky...now feeling nauseous!!😣 Q1: is this the only multigenerational animal model performed to date that is public? Q2: would simple gene sequencing of oocytes in offspring show all or portions of the transfected genome? Q3: the Moderna vs Pfizer suit is related to LNP/SM-102 materials and NOT the genetic sequence of Spike. More of a delivery system to oocytes than a patentable genome edit, or am I missing the point???
As always, brilliant work. You need to get on Tucker or Dr. Drew here soon, mainstream is blowing up with anti-💉💉💉’s of late!!!
Just as an aside, most of the terrible stuff I read seems to be in relation to the mRNA platform jabs specifically, I assume the DNA viral vector jabs are not much better? I’ve not seen or heard anyone I trust talk much about the viral vector mechanism, Bret Weinstein has said a bit but it doesn’t sound like much more than guessing, would you mind giving me your thoughts?? Thanks again Doc
Yup....we’ve entered the “Alternate Universe”........and since our sci-fi world is/has become more and more predictable I think we should research our favorite sci-if (literary) stories for a way out of this planetary mess....;)
This is all happening quite quickly now. In fact, the Monsanto (now Bayer) case really hasn't been explored at the proper level in popular culture for the masses to truly understand how this is now affecting everyone. Unless we find a way to better inform the normies, these mRNA jabs are going to entering every vaccine- they are already discussing the flu jab, for instance. Percy v Goliath is an excellent parallel, but reach others, we may need to use Idiocracy and tell them to stop injecting Brawndo into themselves or the company will own them.
The etymology of the word seminal is seme which is latin for seed. BigPharma is continuing to disseminate their potshuman inheritable spike protein seeds of evil.
Similar problems to this have come up in previous cases.
1. One is a gene which causes breast cancer, which had been patented. The women who have been born with this gene had to fight for the breast cancer treatment and their bodily autonomy.
2 Danish pigs have a gene that causes them to have less body fat. This gene was also patented and the company who owns the patent wanted a royalty for each piglet born in Denmark. This was fought out in the courts by the Danish farmers, I can't remember the outcome but I think the royalty was denied and it limited where Danish bacon could be sold.
Moderna, won't take anyone's kids but they may try to prevent them giving blood for tests and transfusions.
And changing the innocent other species of the environment too. There's a good collection of studies coming out showing that spike persists e.g. in wastewater and impacts genes of other species. As if our farming practices hadn't been doing enough to our fellow earth inhabitants.
I see a short period of time in the future where we can have, instead of gender reveal parties, owner reveal parties, where you will not ask "Boy or girl?" but "Pfizer or Moderna?".
I saw a couple of comments speculating about this being shared on FB by the fringest of fringe paranoid conspiracy theorists - or that was how it seemed at the time.
I guess just another example of how far we have come in the past 2 years...
That Monsanto case in Canada - there was a similar one in SW Western Australia. (I can't remember the name or details, except it was a farmer of an organic farm which got contaminated, and he sued for damages, and in turn got sued for breach of patent or whatever - and a similar no-win outcome.)
I suspect that cases like that are going to become more common too. After all, "You will own nothing..."
"there was a similar one in SW Western Australia. (I can't remember the name or details"
Steve Marsh story beginning & end...
2011 - The Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed the suit on behalf of more than 50 organizations challenging the agricultural giant's patents on its genetically modified seeds. The group is seeking a ruling that would prohibit Monsanto from suing the farmers or dealers if their organic seed becomes contaminated with Monsanto's patented biotech seed germplasm.
2016 - Organic Farmer Dealt Final Blow in Landmark Lawsuit over Monsanto's GMO Contamination
Steve Marsh, an organic farmer in Western Australia, has lost his final bid in his landmark genetic modification contamination lawsuit against his neighboring farmer, Michael Baxter, who planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (GMO) canola.
Always my pleasure, knowledge is power that multiplies when we pass it on, lucky us! As a side note Monsanto/biotech dirtbag tracking was my primary focus for over a decade from 1997 so my archive of reference for gmo food issues is pretty deep. If ever there's an obscure old reference folks can't find just ping me & good odds I have Wayback links or contacts who have the information to share. :~)
a bit more info and some hope at least here in the USA
I followed the original story of Percy's predicament with Monsanto in about 2005 or before, I don't remember now.
What I mention earlier is the only way Monsanto could win such a case was to define the case as within the jurisdiction of Patent Law which the courts did.
However if it was common law or what we call here in the rural parts of California "cow country law" only the damage caused by the patented seed encroachment on Percy's property is to be adjudicated and only the costs of the damages can be assessed.
Monsanto didn't make any friends by their actions against Schmeiser. They never again tried to sue farmers that gained access to their seed because of how the winds blew from a neighbors farm. In the end it was Millions Against Monsanto (USA). Also a ground keeper in the SF Bay Area who got "non hodgkin lymphoma" sued Monsanto and won. It was a jury trial. Again treating Percy so badly has not worked well for them in court or else where. The SCOTUS told Bayer/Monsanto to pay out whatever the many court cases against them rule. No one is going for a class action in this case. Each injured person is suing Bayer/Monsanto directly. Very very expensive for Bayer/Monsanto
I realize that it is humans harmed by Bayer/Monsanto, not farmers and harm to their seed. It is Patent Law at work for Bayer/Monsanto. At this point I see why they want to patent humans. Once humans are patented they can use Patent law against us. At a minimum they will never lose and may win a lot of money, bankrupt the human and scare the hell out of the rest of us.
Your memory has jumbled assortment of mostly true items confused with a few assorted cases to reach wonky conclusions about the law and timelines.
Monsanto is a long suit for me so let's sort it out. The crop cases are about gmo pollen polluting another field then Monsanto demanding fees for their patent protected variety in another field. They treat it like you made a bootleg copy of Microsoft Winblows to sell... it's all about license fees.. rental food another Bill Gates genius marketing plan.
The cancer cases relate to the herbicides used as partner chemicals to the gmo seeds. In the case you recalled it was glyphosate aka Roundup but Dicamba and Paraquat and others pop up in court cases too.
Start with the best good news first.
The case of school groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson was won by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in a first ever award for glyphosate causing his cancer.
Organic Consumers launched Millions Against Monsanto campaign in 1998 and are still a best source for short, reader friendly tracking of biotech food issues & front line for grass roots organizing. In 2011 there was #OccupyFood as part of OWS then big global street marches 2013, 2014, 2015 I have NYC pics for all. Very little has changed w our food or farming but higher toxicity. Legal successes in California have OCA legwork behind it.
OCA sister org is US Right to Know who has the deep research archives and legal tracking. Monsanto Papers are USRTK release.. key for successful lawsuits & basis for journalist Carey Gillam's book Whitewashed. She's a fearless advocate for truth & damn fine researcher in her own right you may notice her work at Children's Health Defense too.
GMWatch is my favorite for global reporting they too track lawsuits for the many contamination cases like Percy's as well as the media propaganda, lobbying, legislation & science studies. They have assorted educational material to explain the science and risks.
Not a word or link you say here I disagree with. My wife and I have met Dewayne Johnson at the UC Berkeley Campus at a lecture presented by Tyron Hayes on Atrazin and the effect it has on sexuality.
My wife, her son and I participated in Occupy the Farm in Berkeley (North end old Hwy 17 I believe there is a Sprouts on a portion of what is left of the Gill Tract) Sadly while Governor of California Regan enabled UC Berkeley to sell the Gill Tract. When given to the University (originally a land grant college) it was not to be sold if memory serves me.
Yes OCA did. We participated very actively in that and even more so in Prop 37 to label GMOs which was barely defeated by the Food industry and Monsanto. So I have feet on the ground in all these issues. I don't remember the details, but I do remember the physical effort.
Finally I saw one of the very first interviews with Percy. It stuck in my mind the fact that Monsanto was using Patent Law against Percy and family. No farmer would understand how and encroachment of seed, pollen or whatever on to their land from a neighbor is their problem. Historically it is the neighbor's responsibility to repair whatever damage they may have caused. I would like to see why the judge decided to allow Monsanto to proceed via patent law. While Percy didn't have to pay Monsanto royalties, he was financially destroyed. Patent law made that possible.
I had been up for two days without much sleep. First day 22 hours and second day 18 hrs which was the day I posted this. So I was tired. But I don't really have the facts wrong. I didn't take the time to document and write sequentially. I wrote from memory.
I appreciate your work clarifying the sequence and providing links. Thank you.
Good for you to have so much front line effort. Yes the defeat ofProp37 cost $35 million and that's when another Calif group created the GMOFree Verified label.. irony now that shows up on conventional crap foods so consumers confuse it w organic.. sigh..
In his book Seeds of Deception Jeff Smith details how Arthur Anderson (Enron accountants) helped design the gmo framework for Monsanto so the liability problems w PCB legacy could be avoided.. it gets into the weeds w lobbying loopholes to explain why this plays out that the contamination is seen as Intellectual Property theft. It took vast coordination across official areas but luckily corrupt government and rich corps manage to get it done.
just a note on the person who spearheaded Prop 37 to label GMOs in Calif. It was Pam Leary. Not sure what she is doing now. But she set the standard as far as I am concerned when it came to integrity grit and getting people motivated to get Prop 37 passed.
You again raise excellent points. I have met Jeffrey Smith on several occasions as well as Vandana Shiva who along with others started Soil Not Oil. She is quite short. Kinda of amazing. It is true dynamite comes in small packages.
The work my wife and I were in actually started decades earlier for me. I will give you a link to indicate how long this struggle has been going in recent times. https://thenhf.com/codex/
I actually joined the movement in 1971. It was always small. And it faded away because the real workers never got media traction. And that is another story. Remember no web in those days.
Today I continue to do what I can. Mostly I try to give history. This fight is very old my parents in ways I didn't appreciate until the last 15 years initiated us children when I was in fifth grade and until I became an adult and started my own life. Many long stories to tell if they ever become useful to the current situation.
But the sand bagging and obstruction of true progress crosses many domains. If you are interested I will share another. I shared it much earlier on substack, but there was no traction so I put it to bed. The situation we find ourselves in is not unique to health. But without health the other areas of obstruction are hopelessly out of reach.
Thank you again for shinning the light on all this. I hope the links you have provided actually get used by folks here on substack.
Because you have done so much work in this area (perhaps many others as well). I wish to include a link to a video that show in 20 minuets what a wonderful book by Professor Michael Hudson wrote, "Forgive the their Debts", which goes back about 10,000 years into the origins of banking and the Jubilee year.
The story of the banana republics, the United Fruit company, or the CIA intervention of the 40s and 50s are virtually impossible stories to tell correctly. They are simply too big and complicated. Mixing them together as I've done here means leaving out a vast majority of the story. A thousand unmentioned thoughts. I think, maybe, with around 3 hours or so you could start to get a basic handle on it, but I've done my best with twenty minutes. Hopefully it helps to at least start painting the picture.
Yes you make a great point and a sad one. Another similar example that cracks me up is "Gluten Free" even in product that have never had gluten in them. People are so impressed if there are a lot of labels saying how "free of..." food products are. Another example is chocolate. There are all these labels telling you how good it is, certified this and that, the one that counts "USDA Organic" not to be found.
I have met Ronnie Cummins on several occasions, and like me, never really thrilled about USDA Organic. Why? You may already know. Once it became USDA Organic, the oversite board was filled corporate food giants that have slowly watered down the organic standards.
On to regenerative agriculture. Most importantly know your local farmer which we do. Also become your local farmer if you can.
Steve Marsh in Western Australia. Se my comment above - even those of us who have not been 'pricked' with the stuff may have inhaled it. We may have to break the corrupted law (after we crush the nut jobs)
Percy was the poster child of the early fight against Monsanto and full extent of the battle worth hearing in his own words. GMWatch has a 2011 documentary series well worth watching.
Fun side note most folks don't know or forget Monsanto & Pfizer were merged or carcinogen aspartame was part of the product line or Donald Rumsfeld's role in aspartame referred to as Rummy's bioweapon... essential toxic history to frame today's captive system.
"Among the many ironies of our modern world is that Gerald Ford awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom-America,s highest civilian honor-to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on January 19, 1977. Just a few weeks later on March 8, Rumsfeld became the CEO of G.D. Searle to take point on a mission to force the Food and Drug Administration to approve for human consumption a known carcinogen and neurotoxic poison."
"Likewise, Searle discovered and introduced aspartame, a hugely successful sugar substitute. The Searle and Hereth Co. was incorporated in 1908 as G.D. Searle and Co. in Chicago, and in 1985, became the pharmaceutical unit of Monsanto.
In 1995, Pharmacia & Upjohn was formed through the merger of Pharmacia AB and The Upjohn Company. Pharmacia & Upjohn became a global provider of human health care products, animal health products, diagnostics and specialty products. In 1998, Pharmacia & Upjohn relocated its global headquarters from the United Kingdom to the United States.
In April 2000, Pharmacia & Upjohn completed a merger with Monsanto and Searle creating Pharmacia, a dynamic new competitor in the pharmaceutical industry. This top-tier company's innovative medicines and other products saved the lives of many and enhanced health and wellness.
Remember Pharmacia-Upjohn was the company sacrificed by Pfizer to take the hit when they were convicted of healthcare fraud and issued with a $1bn criminal fine and $1.3bn civil fine. It was necessary to pass the buck otherwise Pfizer would not be allowed to handle medicaid items again, IIRC
This also explains, why the hell everyone went for an injectable, that would create an immune response mainly through making IgG instead of going for the route through nasal spray which would rest more heavily on IgA and the mucosal membranes, which would make much more sense with a virus like SARS-CoV2. A nasal spray would not make it to the ovaries. Or at least it would be less likely.
Thank you for this.
At least one federal case has asked the courts to rule on the Myriad case precedent on patent law (35 USC 101) as it relates to mRNA injections, with respect to the 13th Amendment prohibiting slavery.
The DOD didn’t address the issue in its replies to the plaintiff, and as far as I know the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals hasn’t ruled on the case yet. It’s Robert v. Austin, filed by Attorney Todd Callender and his team.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/strategies-for-drawing-out-judicial
Callender has been raising the alarm about Myriad, the shots, and chattel ownership of humans by patent holders (which include the corporations but also the US government) for awhile.
Also noteworthy: In 2011, Congress tried to prohibit issuing of patents “directed to or encompassing a human organism,” through the 2011 Act to Amend Title 35, United States Code, to Provide for Patent Reform at Section 33.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-112publ29/pdf/PLAW-112publ29.pdf
At some point, in some of these cases, there will be a direct conflict between the Myriad ruling (that organisms with synthetic DNA are the property of the patent-holder) and the 2011 federal law making a carve-out for patents “directed to or encompassing a human organism.”
A human gene code patent holder might have the right to charge an individual for beneficial therapeutic use of the administered therapeutic code but will have no other rights & of course will have criminal liability should things go wrong & extremely serious criminal liability should they fail to prevent passed on code by inheritance or some other mechanism where the recipients of the code gave no informed consent.
Generally, items purchased are owned by the purchaser, not by any patent holders related to the item purchased, ownership of people is illegal.
Generally speaking all artificial gene tampering should be made illegal with a penalty of capital punishment for those found guilty of the offence with a choice of firing squad, hanging or guillotine or being put on a pile of burning timber.
Or being thrown out of an aircraft over the Atlantic or Pacific at 50,000 feet
Any chance the end run will be that the altered children are not human in the traditional understanding of the term?
This is horrendous! I knew this when I first saw the patents! People are really idiots! How they don't research some brand new experimental technologies, is beyond me!
Honestly, people as a whole are not very bright.
I completely remember when the 🐭army discussed this possibility back in January, cause it blew my mind! but it totally make sense, like it totally makes sense your conclusion/prediction. Nothing surprises me anymore... Unfortunately
Well, the devil is real.
He's a lot smarter than us.
He wants us all enslaved or dead, and he's got plenty of tragically deluded followers in high places who are more than willing to help him toward that goal.
The Greek word pharmakeia refers to sorcery (and is used in the New Testament).
The universal medical symbol features two serpents and directly references the pagan (false) god hermes.
When you know that the devil is real, Occam's razor cuts completely differently.
The good news is The Good News. The Gospels. Jesus Christ has already won our emancipation and salvation.
https://edgarlovesmary.substack.com/p/the-way-it-works
This is a very good pick up. I remember reading a patent case early in the cvd crisis when mRNA was being discussed and the idea of recipients of the vaccine becoming the intellectual property of the patent holder. I'll need to search for the article.
patented pacemakers, prosthetics, dental implants don’t create ownership of the human recipient, why should this be different?
the damages for the genetic harm inflicted should easily exceed the value of the companies (including all patents)
& Bayer got stuck with the Monsanto Roundup baggage.
Because of the supreme court decisions in the article. I can't make it much clearer...
a multi-generational defective, dangerous product for which there was fraudulent misrepresentation & zero informed consent … there will be criminal & class action suits when the injured wake up… why anyone would claim ownership of this monstrosity is beyond my comprehension
How can it still be considered pandemic with that survival
rate? How can it be considered as something that
requires vvaxxination against? It is beyond my comprehension too ksa, thank goodness, we're not
alone.
In the US this would not be the case as ownership of a person is different than an object. The 13th amendment led to the abolition of slavery and indentured servitude outside of penal work
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-13/
Are you saying that the US supreme court would prohibit any claims to licensure of a person even though they already ruled that patenting human DNA was possible? And this is the same US supreme court that recused themselves from any filings relating to the US 2020 election?
What is the definition of a "person" as per the US Constitution?
It sounds like a silly question. It's not.
💕💕💕💕💕💕
The evil that is being done by the pushers of these genetic shots is incomprehensible for most people. I have no doubt that if they could enforce ownership that they would it’s just I think the legal argument as to the ownership of persons os stretched
Look at it this way....implants aren't YOU. They don't share anything with you except location. You may, or may not, depending on the product, be able to continue without them. Maybe not easily, but possibly. However, your DNA is YOU. You are not you without your DNA. If someone has patented something that is in your DNA at birth, or through transcription, they own that portion of your DNA, without which, you cannot survive, because you cannot live without your DNA (all the cells in your body).
Well if Percy vs Monsanto is a light on this. They actually own the entire genome of the plant that is altered. This only happened in Canada as a result of Patent Law being the forum of Law.
the CDC fraudulently misrepresents on its website that these products do not alter dna:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html
They don't own anything, if the patent owner designed some DNA code & it ends up being an identifiable & unique code snippet in a large number of a person's cells the patent owner has essentially sold to or given the stuff to the person to use like some patented item of special function functional clothing. Now should the person start analysing their DNA & then manufacturing the gene snippet tech for selling to others at work for example the patent owner will have a claim against the patent vilatir for compensation & the like. Ownership of the gmoded person is not possible.
they may own the intellectual property but not you as a human
Because the mRNA shots alter the recipient’s DNA, making said recipient a genetically modified organism and, strictly speaking, no longer human. This was evident from publication of the Swedish (I think) some months back that found in vitro DNA alterations post mRNA. This will be adjudicated in the courts eventually.
Changing a person's DNA artificially does not render them not human no matter how we speak about it. If human before being gmoded then human forever. ..
The items you mention can be removed from the body. The vaccine can’t, it becomes part of you.
Re: "patented pacemakers..." it doesn't apply maybe, because they
don't constitute integral, essential part of human entity.
Whereas in a DNA case it renders the whole body to lose its
its sovereignty, becoming "incomplete" to its original form hence,
a "new" and "different" entity. And it is since it is force to function
(never mind, open to manipulation) differently to when it was
in its original form. This is how this little old lady sees it, but
I might be wrong.
someone commented about the US Constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery which seems to be relevant in negating the ‘human ownership’ argument (humans are not plants)
Yeah, I didn't miss that. I probably look at the issue from a different
angle/perspective. Firstly, I live in Australia, no constitutional protection
here, secondly from observing from afar, a lot seems to be resting with
SCOTUS. I think of the amendments, I think how with implementation
of mandatory vvaxxination some rights were violated. I think of
lack of moral integrity in so many. I think of moral and otherwise, corruption. It doesn't seem impossible. IMHO.
😿
I remember seeing something similar and thinking it was schizo stuff. But given that the majority of conspiracy theories around the vaccines have come true so far, it now seems plausible.
Same here, I remember reading about it early on too and, it's been with
me since. Sadly it even didn't seem "too far fetched".
Here is is. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Great article as always. Speechless. God help us.
Wow! Holy fuck! This is simultaneously one of the best and absolute worst articles I’ve ever read. I have felt as though I’ve been trapped inside a sci-fi novel since March 2020, this feels like the breakneck plot twist that smack you in the mouth
I did give you two exit points!
👏 👏 👏 My morning wake-up email from Jikky...now feeling nauseous!!😣 Q1: is this the only multigenerational animal model performed to date that is public? Q2: would simple gene sequencing of oocytes in offspring show all or portions of the transfected genome? Q3: the Moderna vs Pfizer suit is related to LNP/SM-102 materials and NOT the genetic sequence of Spike. More of a delivery system to oocytes than a patentable genome edit, or am I missing the point???
As always, brilliant work. You need to get on Tucker or Dr. Drew here soon, mainstream is blowing up with anti-💉💉💉’s of late!!!
Just as an aside, most of the terrible stuff I read seems to be in relation to the mRNA platform jabs specifically, I assume the DNA viral vector jabs are not much better? I’ve not seen or heard anyone I trust talk much about the viral vector mechanism, Bret Weinstein has said a bit but it doesn’t sound like much more than guessing, would you mind giving me your thoughts?? Thanks again Doc
I couldn't take them. As awful as it is, I'd rather know than not know.
Time to re-read "I have no mouth but I must scream"
https://wjccschools.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/01/I-Have-No-Mouth-But-I-Must-Scream-by-Harlan-Ellison.pdf
Yup....we’ve entered the “Alternate Universe”........and since our sci-fi world is/has become more and more predictable I think we should research our favorite sci-if (literary) stories for a way out of this planetary mess....;)
This is all happening quite quickly now. In fact, the Monsanto (now Bayer) case really hasn't been explored at the proper level in popular culture for the masses to truly understand how this is now affecting everyone. Unless we find a way to better inform the normies, these mRNA jabs are going to entering every vaccine- they are already discussing the flu jab, for instance. Percy v Goliath is an excellent parallel, but reach others, we may need to use Idiocracy and tell them to stop injecting Brawndo into themselves or the company will own them.
You are so right, we're seem to be forgetting that 80% of people don't even know what Monsanto is. IMHO (might be wrong on percentage).
Most believe that GM food is as good if not better, for you.
They've been conditioned for decades. Never mind the "nuances" of
the issue, this is basics. With the food shortages/crisis/general upheaval
coming, if anything only further confusion can be expected. Imho
You can catch up on Bayer/Monsanto as Vandana Shiva has been in the middle of this global fight for some time. Here are links:
https://www.ecowatch.com/vandana-shiva-small-farmers-are-foundation-to-food-security-not-corpor-1891137782.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdPBLQifcz8
https://wilderutopia.com/health/vandana-shiva-monsanto-impoverishes-ecosystems-farmers-consumers/
Thank you, unfamiliar with one of those. She's a great warrior and has been fighting for a long time unrelentingly. Very impressive lady.
Okay, regarding the poll, who are the 6% [so far] morons who are okay with this???????
Heritable poison. Ain't mandates grand.
It was there to draw in the mutton crew and their pathetic minions....
Ah haaaaaa. I wonder if Clarice hear them screaming in their echo chamber? 👀
Yeah sorry my finger slipped ...
The etymology of the word seminal is seme which is latin for seed. BigPharma is continuing to disseminate their potshuman inheritable spike protein seeds of evil.
I covered the reverse transcriptas horrors here:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/the-newborn-are-not-alright-billions
and here:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/minor-correction-the-newborns-are
Reposted your article:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/who-owns-who
Thanks again!
Similar problems to this have come up in previous cases.
1. One is a gene which causes breast cancer, which had been patented. The women who have been born with this gene had to fight for the breast cancer treatment and their bodily autonomy.
2 Danish pigs have a gene that causes them to have less body fat. This gene was also patented and the company who owns the patent wanted a royalty for each piglet born in Denmark. This was fought out in the courts by the Danish farmers, I can't remember the outcome but I think the royalty was denied and it limited where Danish bacon could be sold.
Moderna, won't take anyone's kids but they may try to prevent them giving blood for tests and transfusions.
Or require them to give blood / stem cells / whatever
This.
In addition to changing forever the relationship, of that subset of the human race, to the environment in which it was designed to live.
And changing the innocent other species of the environment too. There's a good collection of studies coming out showing that spike persists e.g. in wastewater and impacts genes of other species. As if our farming practices hadn't been doing enough to our fellow earth inhabitants.
I see a short period of time in the future where we can have, instead of gender reveal parties, owner reveal parties, where you will not ask "Boy or girl?" but "Pfizer or Moderna?".
That’s not funny but I am laughing horrifiedly.
Humans are the commodity. It’s why digital ID is being implemented everywhere.
I saw a couple of comments speculating about this being shared on FB by the fringest of fringe paranoid conspiracy theorists - or that was how it seemed at the time.
I guess just another example of how far we have come in the past 2 years...
That Monsanto case in Canada - there was a similar one in SW Western Australia. (I can't remember the name or details, except it was a farmer of an organic farm which got contaminated, and he sued for damages, and in turn got sued for breach of patent or whatever - and a similar no-win outcome.)
I suspect that cases like that are going to become more common too. After all, "You will own nothing..."
"there was a similar one in SW Western Australia. (I can't remember the name or details"
Steve Marsh story beginning & end...
2011 - The Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed the suit on behalf of more than 50 organizations challenging the agricultural giant's patents on its genetically modified seeds. The group is seeking a ruling that would prohibit Monsanto from suing the farmers or dealers if their organic seed becomes contaminated with Monsanto's patented biotech seed germplasm.
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/organic-farmers-sue-monsanto-over-genetic-contamination
2016 - Organic Farmer Dealt Final Blow in Landmark Lawsuit over Monsanto's GMO Contamination
Steve Marsh, an organic farmer in Western Australia, has lost his final bid in his landmark genetic modification contamination lawsuit against his neighboring farmer, Michael Baxter, who planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (GMO) canola.
https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/organic-farmer-dealt-final-blow-landmark-lawsuit-over-monsantos-gmo-contamination
Thanks for sharing that info! I'll make a note of it for future reference.
It's all a bit depressing - hard to win against these mega-corporations that are intent on taking over the world and everything in it, including us.
Always my pleasure, knowledge is power that multiplies when we pass it on, lucky us! As a side note Monsanto/biotech dirtbag tracking was my primary focus for over a decade from 1997 so my archive of reference for gmo food issues is pretty deep. If ever there's an obscure old reference folks can't find just ping me & good odds I have Wayback links or contacts who have the information to share. :~)
a bit more info and some hope at least here in the USA
I followed the original story of Percy's predicament with Monsanto in about 2005 or before, I don't remember now.
What I mention earlier is the only way Monsanto could win such a case was to define the case as within the jurisdiction of Patent Law which the courts did.
However if it was common law or what we call here in the rural parts of California "cow country law" only the damage caused by the patented seed encroachment on Percy's property is to be adjudicated and only the costs of the damages can be assessed.
Monsanto didn't make any friends by their actions against Schmeiser. They never again tried to sue farmers that gained access to their seed because of how the winds blew from a neighbors farm. In the end it was Millions Against Monsanto (USA). Also a ground keeper in the SF Bay Area who got "non hodgkin lymphoma" sued Monsanto and won. It was a jury trial. Again treating Percy so badly has not worked well for them in court or else where. The SCOTUS told Bayer/Monsanto to pay out whatever the many court cases against them rule. No one is going for a class action in this case. Each injured person is suing Bayer/Monsanto directly. Very very expensive for Bayer/Monsanto
I realize that it is humans harmed by Bayer/Monsanto, not farmers and harm to their seed. It is Patent Law at work for Bayer/Monsanto. At this point I see why they want to patent humans. Once humans are patented they can use Patent law against us. At a minimum they will never lose and may win a lot of money, bankrupt the human and scare the hell out of the rest of us.
Your memory has jumbled assortment of mostly true items confused with a few assorted cases to reach wonky conclusions about the law and timelines.
Monsanto is a long suit for me so let's sort it out. The crop cases are about gmo pollen polluting another field then Monsanto demanding fees for their patent protected variety in another field. They treat it like you made a bootleg copy of Microsoft Winblows to sell... it's all about license fees.. rental food another Bill Gates genius marketing plan.
The cancer cases relate to the herbicides used as partner chemicals to the gmo seeds. In the case you recalled it was glyphosate aka Roundup but Dicamba and Paraquat and others pop up in court cases too.
Start with the best good news first.
The case of school groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson was won by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in a first ever award for glyphosate causing his cancer.
https://www.organicconsumers.org/blog/appeals-court-upholds-groundskeepers-roundup-cancer-trial-win-over-monsanto
Organic Consumers launched Millions Against Monsanto campaign in 1998 and are still a best source for short, reader friendly tracking of biotech food issues & front line for grass roots organizing. In 2011 there was #OccupyFood as part of OWS then big global street marches 2013, 2014, 2015 I have NYC pics for all. Very little has changed w our food or farming but higher toxicity. Legal successes in California have OCA legwork behind it.
2011 pics https://www.flickr.com/photos/pameladrew/albums/72157628285192519
OCA sister org is US Right to Know who has the deep research archives and legal tracking. Monsanto Papers are USRTK release.. key for successful lawsuits & basis for journalist Carey Gillam's book Whitewashed. She's a fearless advocate for truth & damn fine researcher in her own right you may notice her work at Children's Health Defense too.
https://usrtk.org/monsanto-papers/
https://usrtk.org/monsanto-papers/federal-court/#general-mdl-documents
https://usrtk.org/monsanto-roundup-trial-tracker-index/
GMWatch is my favorite for global reporting they too track lawsuits for the many contamination cases like Percy's as well as the media propaganda, lobbying, legislation & science studies. They have assorted educational material to explain the science and risks.
https://gmwatch.org/en/20012.gmo-myths-and-facts-what-they-don-t-want-to-tell-you-about-genetically-modified-crops-and-foods
https://gmwatch.org/en/articles/gm-myth-makers
Not a word or link you say here I disagree with. My wife and I have met Dewayne Johnson at the UC Berkeley Campus at a lecture presented by Tyron Hayes on Atrazin and the effect it has on sexuality.
My wife, her son and I participated in Occupy the Farm in Berkeley (North end old Hwy 17 I believe there is a Sprouts on a portion of what is left of the Gill Tract) Sadly while Governor of California Regan enabled UC Berkeley to sell the Gill Tract. When given to the University (originally a land grant college) it was not to be sold if memory serves me.
Yes OCA did. We participated very actively in that and even more so in Prop 37 to label GMOs which was barely defeated by the Food industry and Monsanto. So I have feet on the ground in all these issues. I don't remember the details, but I do remember the physical effort.
Finally I saw one of the very first interviews with Percy. It stuck in my mind the fact that Monsanto was using Patent Law against Percy and family. No farmer would understand how and encroachment of seed, pollen or whatever on to their land from a neighbor is their problem. Historically it is the neighbor's responsibility to repair whatever damage they may have caused. I would like to see why the judge decided to allow Monsanto to proceed via patent law. While Percy didn't have to pay Monsanto royalties, he was financially destroyed. Patent law made that possible.
I had been up for two days without much sleep. First day 22 hours and second day 18 hrs which was the day I posted this. So I was tired. But I don't really have the facts wrong. I didn't take the time to document and write sequentially. I wrote from memory.
I appreciate your work clarifying the sequence and providing links. Thank you.
Good for you to have so much front line effort. Yes the defeat ofProp37 cost $35 million and that's when another Calif group created the GMOFree Verified label.. irony now that shows up on conventional crap foods so consumers confuse it w organic.. sigh..
In his book Seeds of Deception Jeff Smith details how Arthur Anderson (Enron accountants) helped design the gmo framework for Monsanto so the liability problems w PCB legacy could be avoided.. it gets into the weeds w lobbying loopholes to explain why this plays out that the contamination is seen as Intellectual Property theft. It took vast coordination across official areas but luckily corrupt government and rich corps manage to get it done.
just a note on the person who spearheaded Prop 37 to label GMOs in Calif. It was Pam Leary. Not sure what she is doing now. But she set the standard as far as I am concerned when it came to integrity grit and getting people motivated to get Prop 37 passed.
You again raise excellent points. I have met Jeffrey Smith on several occasions as well as Vandana Shiva who along with others started Soil Not Oil. She is quite short. Kinda of amazing. It is true dynamite comes in small packages.
The work my wife and I were in actually started decades earlier for me. I will give you a link to indicate how long this struggle has been going in recent times. https://thenhf.com/codex/
I actually joined the movement in 1971. It was always small. And it faded away because the real workers never got media traction. And that is another story. Remember no web in those days.
Today I continue to do what I can. Mostly I try to give history. This fight is very old my parents in ways I didn't appreciate until the last 15 years initiated us children when I was in fifth grade and until I became an adult and started my own life. Many long stories to tell if they ever become useful to the current situation.
But the sand bagging and obstruction of true progress crosses many domains. If you are interested I will share another. I shared it much earlier on substack, but there was no traction so I put it to bed. The situation we find ourselves in is not unique to health. But without health the other areas of obstruction are hopelessly out of reach.
Thank you again for shinning the light on all this. I hope the links you have provided actually get used by folks here on substack.
peace
Because you have done so much work in this area (perhaps many others as well). I wish to include a link to a video that show in 20 minuets what a wonderful book by Professor Michael Hudson wrote, "Forgive the their Debts", which goes back about 10,000 years into the origins of banking and the Jubilee year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BIA4dgAJ9A
The story of the banana republics, the United Fruit company, or the CIA intervention of the 40s and 50s are virtually impossible stories to tell correctly. They are simply too big and complicated. Mixing them together as I've done here means leaving out a vast majority of the story. A thousand unmentioned thoughts. I think, maybe, with around 3 hours or so you could start to get a basic handle on it, but I've done my best with twenty minutes. Hopefully it helps to at least start painting the picture.
and
https://apple.news/ABbwhFvrJROWWTFl5FZBl_A
a wonderful lullaby for folks so they can forget about climate change. "WE (they) GOT THIS"
Yes you make a great point and a sad one. Another similar example that cracks me up is "Gluten Free" even in product that have never had gluten in them. People are so impressed if there are a lot of labels saying how "free of..." food products are. Another example is chocolate. There are all these labels telling you how good it is, certified this and that, the one that counts "USDA Organic" not to be found.
I have met Ronnie Cummins on several occasions, and like me, never really thrilled about USDA Organic. Why? You may already know. Once it became USDA Organic, the oversite board was filled corporate food giants that have slowly watered down the organic standards.
On to regenerative agriculture. Most importantly know your local farmer which we do. Also become your local farmer if you can.
peace
…I doubt it, if they do it won’t be how they like it and all of their own doing. What does one gain if one sells one’s soul?
Steve Marsh in Western Australia. Se my comment above - even those of us who have not been 'pricked' with the stuff may have inhaled it. We may have to break the corrupted law (after we crush the nut jobs)
Would this include getting the vaccine prior to conception?
Yes
How about just having the virus? I’m trying to hold on to some hope for my children n grandchildren!
Also curious about this.
What about only the father being vaccinated before conceiving a child? What are the chances of anything being passed through him to baby?
Percy was the poster child of the early fight against Monsanto and full extent of the battle worth hearing in his own words. GMWatch has a 2011 documentary series well worth watching.
https://www.gmwatch.org/en/gm-videosb/24-corporate-takeover/12904-percy-schmeiser
Fun side note most folks don't know or forget Monsanto & Pfizer were merged or carcinogen aspartame was part of the product line or Donald Rumsfeld's role in aspartame referred to as Rummy's bioweapon... essential toxic history to frame today's captive system.
Rumsfeld
https://web.archive.org/web/20060111130600/https://rense.com/general67/rum.htm
"Among the many ironies of our modern world is that Gerald Ford awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom-America,s highest civilian honor-to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on January 19, 1977. Just a few weeks later on March 8, Rumsfeld became the CEO of G.D. Searle to take point on a mission to force the Food and Drug Administration to approve for human consumption a known carcinogen and neurotoxic poison."
PfizerMerger
https://web.archive.org/web/20130820091420/https://www.pfizer.com/about/history/pfizer_pharmacia
"Likewise, Searle discovered and introduced aspartame, a hugely successful sugar substitute. The Searle and Hereth Co. was incorporated in 1908 as G.D. Searle and Co. in Chicago, and in 1985, became the pharmaceutical unit of Monsanto.
In 1995, Pharmacia & Upjohn was formed through the merger of Pharmacia AB and The Upjohn Company. Pharmacia & Upjohn became a global provider of human health care products, animal health products, diagnostics and specialty products. In 1998, Pharmacia & Upjohn relocated its global headquarters from the United Kingdom to the United States.
In April 2000, Pharmacia & Upjohn completed a merger with Monsanto and Searle creating Pharmacia, a dynamic new competitor in the pharmaceutical industry. This top-tier company's innovative medicines and other products saved the lives of many and enhanced health and wellness.
Remember Pharmacia-Upjohn was the company sacrificed by Pfizer to take the hit when they were convicted of healthcare fraud and issued with a $1bn criminal fine and $1.3bn civil fine. It was necessary to pass the buck otherwise Pfizer would not be allowed to handle medicaid items again, IIRC
This also explains, why the hell everyone went for an injectable, that would create an immune response mainly through making IgG instead of going for the route through nasal spray which would rest more heavily on IgA and the mucosal membranes, which would make much more sense with a virus like SARS-CoV2. A nasal spray would not make it to the ovaries. Or at least it would be less likely.
And one would think that as a respiratory virus, a nasal spray would seem to be more utilitarian?