We don't know. if you open the pdf you can see the breakdown of fragments by size and instead of that curve falling off in a regular smooth manner there are bumps at around 1890nt and 2932nt.
It is possible that there are two additional RNAs in there, and without sequencing nobody will know what they are.
We don't know. if you open the pdf you can see the breakdown of fragments by size and instead of that curve falling off in a regular smooth manner there are bumps at around 1890nt and 2932nt.
It is possible that there are two additional RNAs in there, and without sequencing nobody will know what they are.
Spike encoding mRNA could break at those locations. In which case my understanding is that no protein will be made. If broken strands can reattach randomly, then random variations of the spike protein can be produced.
This is almost like a drug manufacturer getting a prodrug to market by saying what it *should* metabolise into, without studying what it actually metabolises into.
They should never have been approved in the first place.
That question has been among my most serious concerns about this whole technology. Essentially this product manufactures itself in situ after administration.
When I read the Pfizer dossier filed with EMA, I couldnтАЩt believe theyтАЩd been permitted to rise humans in a trial, let alone launch it.
Nobody knows what is encoded because the manufacturers have not even been required to demonstrate what is made. ItтАЩs literally a conspiracy because I know that we canтАЩt know. It must be determined empirically.
It is my understanding that provided the start codon is intact, itтАЩs possible that a nested series of polypeptides will be formed.
We don't know. if you open the pdf you can see the breakdown of fragments by size and instead of that curve falling off in a regular smooth manner there are bumps at around 1890nt and 2932nt.
It is possible that there are two additional RNAs in there, and without sequencing nobody will know what they are.
Is it possible that those are the locations where breakage occurs most easily?
If that's true what the hell is it encoding?
Spike encoding mRNA could break at those locations. In which case my understanding is that no protein will be made. If broken strands can reattach randomly, then random variations of the spike protein can be produced.
This right here.
This is almost like a drug manufacturer getting a prodrug to market by saying what it *should* metabolise into, without studying what it actually metabolises into.
They should never have been approved in the first place.
Actually, it never was approved or even emergency authorised.
Instead the HHS Secretary just waved / waived it through.
FDA pretended to review a pretend dossier. Appalling fakery.
That question has been among my most serious concerns about this whole technology. Essentially this product manufactures itself in situ after administration.
When I read the Pfizer dossier filed with EMA, I couldnтАЩt believe theyтАЩd been permitted to rise humans in a trial, let alone launch it.
Nobody knows what is encoded because the manufacturers have not even been required to demonstrate what is made. ItтАЩs literally a conspiracy because I know that we canтАЩt know. It must be determined empirically.
It is my understanding that provided the start codon is intact, itтАЩs possible that a nested series of polypeptides will be formed.