13 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Antipodes's avatar

I know a mid 20's couple with recently born child.

Both 2x jabbed before conception, boosted during gestation.

The child was born early, under weight and struggled for months to put on weight. She is still a slow grower.

So yes, it is entirely possible that there will be serious side effects in kids, whether it be limb loss, growth abnormalities, or even brain development.

Expand full comment
Irunthis1's avatar

My coworker who did not get the injection during her pregnancy but was married to a man who DID (and also as a pharmacist she injected hundreds of people with these products while pregnant) and delivered a child in Dec ‘21 who also was born underweight and struggled for months to gain weight and thrive (she didn’t gain ANY weight for the first 8 weeks!). Coincidence? I told her she’d better do a better job protecting herself from that shit while she was pregnant and she basically brushed me off as coo-coo. I myself wouldn’t give them to anyone and luckily didn’t have to due to my work schedule (overnights). I’d have quit two years ago if that wasn’t the case.

Expand full comment
Antipodes's avatar

I just remembered.

Her Brother died Dec 2022 of Turbo Cancers, 27 yr old male.

So it seems their family DNA is susceptible to damage from this injection.

Expand full comment
learningprudence's avatar

Is susceptible family DNA the issue or vaccine batch number? Perhaps both. Either way, very sad for this family.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Could be any number of issues. Big pharma like to make it DNA as it covers up its sins.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

"Turbo Cancers" meaning fast growing tumors? Where?

Expand full comment
Antipodes's avatar

the poor fella, had it everywhere, brains, spleen, skin.

No matter how much treatment he got, the damned cancers would pop up again and again.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Very sorry to hear that. Cancer is a big pharma scam. I was diagnosed with cancer, in reality toxic poisoning, which is by an large what cancer is. Big pharma treatments are all poisonous. This is what was the primary cause of my issues.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

Can you be more specific

Expand full comment
Antonius Mengelefauci ​​🐭​'s avatar

Very likely! The genome had a role in the spike infection and we're supposed to believe that transfecting the organs to create spike count at another lever & durability does no harm?

This paper is from 2020 (and I really hate these genetics studies which remind me of eugenics programs that were ran in many countries, and the evil didn't suddenly just disappear like the flu did):

"The susceptibility of different populations to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet understood. Here, we combined ACE2 coding variants' analysis in different populations and computational chemistry calculations to probe the effects on SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 interaction. ACE2-K26R; which is most frequent in Ashkenazi Jewish population decreased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 electrostatic attraction.

On the contrary, ACE2-I468V, R219C, K341R, D206G, G211R increased the electrostatic attraction; ordered by binding strength from weakest to strongest. The aforementioned variants are most frequent in East Asian, South Asian, African and African American, European, European and South Asian populations, respectively."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32844124/

Genetics matter but they had to push the one-size fits all countermeasure, this is from 2022:

'Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3 gene polymorphisms are associated with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity: A meta-analysis'

by Li et al.

"Conclusions: The findings indicated that IFITM3 rs12252 gene polymorphisms were associated with COVID-19 susceptibility and that the rs12252-C variant was particularly critical for severity. Genetic factors should be considered in future vaccine development."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35461906/

A politically correct way of saying the Science(tm) effed up.

This is from Jan. 2022:

'A systematic review on papers that study on Single Nucleotide Polymorphism that affects coronavirus 2019 severity'

by Suh et al.

"Conclusions

We found that ACE2, TMPRSS2, and IFITM3 are the major genes that are involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The mentioned SNPs were all related to one or more of the above-mentioned genes. There were discussions on certain SNPs that increased the infection and severity to certain groups more than the others. However, as there is limited follow-up and data due to a shortage of time history of the disease, studies may be limited."

https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07034-w

Test of time is the only test that matters here and the large studies needed to confirm the similar effects from the transfectant will never be funded. It would put an end these god-complex maniacs.

Also, a smallish Thai study found a genetic condition linked to the severity of the disease.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s10038-021-01009-6

It's amazing how much the effort was put to studying the effects of the infection compared to the injection's, which is IMHO non-existent. Tired out/hyperfocused immune system and gene regulation will lead to all kinds of "natural" CODs caused by the very unnatural intervention, and therefore no govt is willing to have an independent research of the "vaccine" effects.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

Any other abnormalities? Is she eating properly? Is she focusing her eyes? How does she respond to auditory stimuli?

Expand full comment
Antipodes's avatar

She ticks all the boxes for "good health" as far as I am aware, Mum's father is an actual Doctor, so no lack of private medical advice there.

Expand full comment
Jonathan's avatar

Great to hear. Cheers

Expand full comment