(1) HIV (Gp-120 to be precise) inserts are peptides. They have been codon optimised so they can't be traced back to a specific virus or have certain properties when coded this way. They never thought we would trace them or question them. So these genome sequences code for the very HIV-1 peptides that exist in HIV-1 isoforms. There is var…
(1) HIV (Gp-120 to be precise) inserts are peptides. They have been codon optimised so they can't be traced back to a specific virus or have certain properties when coded this way. They never thought we would trace them or question them. So these genome sequences code for the very HIV-1 peptides that exist in HIV-1 isoforms. There is variability so they will use this to say "we didn't take them from HIV because they are from different versions of HIV so we can't have done".
(2) It is a created sequence. Ecohealth were found to have withheld some sequences in the USRTK.org FOI release. They did not submit them to Genbank so they don't exist. When Daszak was asked about the missing sequences he referred the reporter to the Latinne paper in Nature. But this paper has a number of problems including the presence of gene sequences (accession numbers) that are not theirs. The logical conclusion of this is that they stole the accession numbers to hide the fact that they never uploaded some sequences (my guess is 3 sequences but could be more)
(3) The inserts bind DC-SIGN which is the mechanism that HIV uses to infect your T cells. The SARS2 virus probably won't cause you major problems but the vaccine (same protein) may cause serious problems because it is continuously produced. It would be like having a continuous production of HIV-like protein in your body, exhausting your T-cells.
(4) Anybody claiming that this arose from testing a live attenuated vaccine (LAV) is either missing the point or is genuinely an agent sent to shut down the debate (shill). The proof is that fact that Zengli Shi published an antidote (EK14C) for the virus. You do not create an antidote for a LAV. To be clear I am not addressing this at you but am informing you that this will be the next excuse. It is false and anybody promulgating it is acting on behalf of the very people who have covered up the story so far.
One final point of importance. All those who covered up the story and denigrated Pradhan are responsible for the death of literally thousands of people. If Pradhan's paper had been allowed to be discussed the history of "covid-19" would have been completely different including the rollout of hydroxychloroquine, arrest of Anthony Fauci and many others who were involved. The Great Barrington Declaration would have been the preferred pathway and the first wave of "covid-19" would have burnt out like SARS1 did. That didn't happen and the public policies of masks, lockdowns and leaky vaccines have caused the perpetuation of a viral outbreak that should have ended in June 2020. All those responsible for quashing Pradhan's paper are, in my opinion, directly responsible for the global outcome.
So if SARS2 probably won't cause any major problems what do you think was the point of it? 'Just' a lab-leak and so everything since has been CYA or intentional to bring forth the vaccines?
With the LAV theory, would they not first create a chimera to attenuate. So an antidote would be needed for the chimera (just in case)?
I fully agree with your last paragraph. Do you think masks, lockdowns etc were deliberately used so as it didn't burn out too early and so to extend the pandemic until vaccines could be produced?
It was a bioweapon but not in the traditional sense. SARS1 was high pathogenicity but low transmission. That experiment failed. MERS similarly failed. This was intended to scare the world into accepting state control even over bodily autonomy. It succeeded despite low overall mortality. The weapon was the fear, not the virus.
Interesting and makes sense. Do you think the vaccine is a bioweapon? Or do you think the vaccine was just pharmaceuticals taking advantage? The world had already accepted state control and bodily autonomy. Or do you think the story goes further and the vaccine was intended to injure?
Personally - and this is speculation - the whole thing was intended for control. And the point is that they didn't *care* whether it killed. Because in their world, we are scum. We are idiots. We are not them so we can be dispensed with. So if the project works, they get control and the people love them. If it fails they will use the media against the people and it will take 40 years for the people to get recompense, by which time they have gone. This is literally what happened with thalidomide. This time the media must be brought to account. The media personalities who covered for them must be given life sentences at least. That is the only way that this ends. Individuals like Ben Fordham and Jim Wilson in Australia who advocated for mandates and lockdowns. And the celebrities who pushed the failed vaccines as a kind of advertising... like Dolly Parton and of course Albert Bourla. They must face an international criminal court. And if convicted of conspiracy to corporate manslaughter must face a life sentence. Unless this happens what you are seeing now will be just the tip of the iceberg
Schwab & his school of dimwits in power: Great Reset +
What are the odds of *this* being a random sequence:
1- Covid madness & lockdowns;
2- Mandatory-Vaccine vectored everything-disease Great Culling (on going);
3- A weird series of industrial plant explosions, mainly pharmaceutical & agro-food related (on going);
4- Russian provoked Ukraine war (on going, with probable extension);
5- "Western" suicidal Sanctions destroying essential world flows in Energy, Food & Fertilizers;
6- 40 billion USD worth of weaponry, to include long range missiles, being dumped haphazardly in aforementionned collapsed mafia land, pumped up with Chechens & Isis fighters;
7- What next?
"We do not yet know ze full extent and ze zystemic & ztrructural changes that will happen, however, we do know ze global energy zystems, food zystems & supply chains will be deeply affected."
As a hypothesis, it could be that, with the rapid development of all kinds of different medications in the late 20th century, it is known to pharmaceutical companies at this point that many of already approved and widely used medications will cause broad damage in aging patients. Now look at the list of adverse effects of the Pfizer vaccine, it takes several pages just to name them. If the majority of the aging population is bamboozled into signing a waiver for an EUA product whose adverse effects take several pages, they will not be able to blame their health problems onto approved medications they took throughout their lives. Therefore, no refunds
SARS2 was the trojan horse to introduce the jab. The jab is the bio weapon.
Just like Hiroshima and Nagasaki—they wanted to use the weapon as a real world test, flaws and all, just to see what happens. Lives damaged and lost and the wake of destruction are part of the show for them.
This falls within my prior WMD experience, for numerous reasons.
The primary thing I want to address, Naked Emperor, is your question regarding lockdowns/masks/etc.
Dr. Fauci certainly would be capable of coming up with such justifications for the lockdowns, but the FOIA evidence I've seen [which is all 126K pages of it] doesn't support that idea. The 105K of Baric emails mostly follow the email chains of the Red Dawn group that was swapping information and coordinating the general response behind the scenes. Carter Mecher, Eva [can't remember her last name], and a few others were big proponents of lockdowns; their template was mostly the 1918 H1N1 pandemic, not what was happening in Wuhan. There were a lot of comparisons of the progression and scale of the outbreaks in different cities, especially Philadelphia and St Louis, as I recall. The lesson was that the earlier a lockdown was implemented, the better. Wuhan simply proved their point because they compared it with other Chinese cities.
Fauci wasn't even in charge of the pandemic response at that point in time [in February], but once he was he was clearly on board with expanding emergency powers. It's exactly how he was able to practically institutionalize the scientific censorship.
I agree that the origins of SARS & MERS are suspicious [the Chinese thought the same thing about SARS], but there's far more evidence to support a natural origin with those two viruses than with this one. Dr. Quay's Bayesian Analysis [either version] references several pieces of evidence that attest to this; I know Arkmedic is familiar with its arguments so that's first place I'd recommend.
Personally, I think the orig of the 3 inserts is ultimately irrelevant, because the 4th is unequivocally artificial. Decroly calculated and reached the opposite conclusion of Pradhan & Montagnier for #'s 1-3, but at the end of the day no sarbecovirus could've recombined to provide the PRRA, and the genetic distance between CoV branches is to steep to accomodate that recombination.
I agree with Mona that RaTG13 and the two 'Z' species from Guangdong are most likely intermediate artificial constructs that show that they were trying to slowly construct something through passaging, before adding in the QTNSPRRA to finish the job.
As for SARS-CoV-2, the evidence points in the direction of a bioweapon. It is a very unique creation, in that strategically it falls outside the traditional definition of "incapacitating agent" because it appears likely to have broad 2nd & 3rd order effects [on immune systems, for example] and it is difficult to know what was intended vs. what has emerged through a twisted sort of 'luck.' I'm not a believer in the "reduction of global population argument," because that is a globalist perspective and neither China nor the US would've developed a pathogen toward that end. That doesn't mean that others could swoop in to take advantage of the crisis.
The pharmaceautical industry is motivated by money thus would have no interest in depopulation. Unfortunately the military are only interested in obliterating an enemy, and then we have people like Bill Gates who obsesses about over population. So there is a tension between differing viewpoints each with considerable power. This bioweapon was created possibly to produce an antidote for soldiers to continue fighting for long enough to get the job done. The civilian population has never been a consideration for the military. What interests me is the events in Shanghai and murmurs of an avian flu more deadly than anything we have seen. I have just read how millions of chickens and turkeys are being killed both in China and America to prevent the spread of a virus that hasn't happened. Obviously the intent is to continue unbalancing the population and create significant food shortages, prevent people from consuming meat in exchange for manufactured foodstuffs. As with the global warming crisis, the shift is being put into place before viable alternatives have been erected. This nonsense has yet to end and l am beginning to feel it never will. In spite of the excellent work some of you are doing in researching these materials and exposing them, we are sliding into an abyss from which there can be no escape.
Yes, I really think you have your finger on it when you talk about changes in food production and especially processing. Pharma has already waded into food production with protein supplements and are promoting them directly to the public through TV advertising. Protein supplements used to be for athletes and cancer patients. Now everyone drinks their protein. They can put anything in those “supplements” and people will drink them. They have killed millions of chickens and turkeys to stop bird flu, so apparently herd/flock immunity doesn’t matter with poultry. 🤷♀️
What do you mean the vaccine is continuously produced? Do you believe that the cells will continue to produce the spike protein forever or that people are continuing to get vaccinated?
The mRNA will eventually wane and the human body is amazing at detoxifying. Think Arsenic. If you don't keep up with administering it regularly the victim will be cured. It is like this with mRNA. It requires repeat administration. Sure there are short term disasters but if you survive that you will likely find that the effects wane. If you continue with the boosters you are taking a big risk.
Banned for: (1) accusing of blocking without having been blocked, so I might as well block you and (2) accusing me of posting disinformation without any evidence to back up your statement.
Oh it's you. The answer to your questions are this:
(1) because I can spot a shill and their approach. There is a huge difference between a scientist who wants to discuss the science and a shill who is intent on disparaging and denigrating in order to impose their idea on others.
(2) the thread you are replying to is fully evidenced. As a shill your response is to frame your question with ridiculous assertions like "why do you keep pushing misleading theories?". I have not read beyond those words. It is not my fault that you don't understand the relevance of EK1C4 to the Gp-120 sequences, Baric and Daszak. It's nice that you have a role in life to shill for them but it's not useful to the world. I really hope that you can sleep at night taking on this role to try to push disinformation to protect those psychopaths. You are one of the people who I would consider more responsible for the genocide than even Daszak Shi and Fauci. Because you are happily going around trying to quash the truth with your ridiculous denigrations that never have any evidence. Please find another place to post your crap - your comments will be preserved. This is because all those people who contributed to Daszak's propaganda machine will eventually face investigation. We are patient.
(1) HIV (Gp-120 to be precise) inserts are peptides. They have been codon optimised so they can't be traced back to a specific virus or have certain properties when coded this way. They never thought we would trace them or question them. So these genome sequences code for the very HIV-1 peptides that exist in HIV-1 isoforms. There is variability so they will use this to say "we didn't take them from HIV because they are from different versions of HIV so we can't have done".
(2) It is a created sequence. Ecohealth were found to have withheld some sequences in the USRTK.org FOI release. They did not submit them to Genbank so they don't exist. When Daszak was asked about the missing sequences he referred the reporter to the Latinne paper in Nature. But this paper has a number of problems including the presence of gene sequences (accession numbers) that are not theirs. The logical conclusion of this is that they stole the accession numbers to hide the fact that they never uploaded some sequences (my guess is 3 sequences but could be more)
(3) The inserts bind DC-SIGN which is the mechanism that HIV uses to infect your T cells. The SARS2 virus probably won't cause you major problems but the vaccine (same protein) may cause serious problems because it is continuously produced. It would be like having a continuous production of HIV-like protein in your body, exhausting your T-cells.
(4) Anybody claiming that this arose from testing a live attenuated vaccine (LAV) is either missing the point or is genuinely an agent sent to shut down the debate (shill). The proof is that fact that Zengli Shi published an antidote (EK14C) for the virus. You do not create an antidote for a LAV. To be clear I am not addressing this at you but am informing you that this will be the next excuse. It is false and anybody promulgating it is acting on behalf of the very people who have covered up the story so far.
One final point of importance. All those who covered up the story and denigrated Pradhan are responsible for the death of literally thousands of people. If Pradhan's paper had been allowed to be discussed the history of "covid-19" would have been completely different including the rollout of hydroxychloroquine, arrest of Anthony Fauci and many others who were involved. The Great Barrington Declaration would have been the preferred pathway and the first wave of "covid-19" would have burnt out like SARS1 did. That didn't happen and the public policies of masks, lockdowns and leaky vaccines have caused the perpetuation of a viral outbreak that should have ended in June 2020. All those responsible for quashing Pradhan's paper are, in my opinion, directly responsible for the global outcome.
Thanks for replying.
So if SARS2 probably won't cause any major problems what do you think was the point of it? 'Just' a lab-leak and so everything since has been CYA or intentional to bring forth the vaccines?
With the LAV theory, would they not first create a chimera to attenuate. So an antidote would be needed for the chimera (just in case)?
I fully agree with your last paragraph. Do you think masks, lockdowns etc were deliberately used so as it didn't burn out too early and so to extend the pandemic until vaccines could be produced?
It was a bioweapon but not in the traditional sense. SARS1 was high pathogenicity but low transmission. That experiment failed. MERS similarly failed. This was intended to scare the world into accepting state control even over bodily autonomy. It succeeded despite low overall mortality. The weapon was the fear, not the virus.
Interesting and makes sense. Do you think the vaccine is a bioweapon? Or do you think the vaccine was just pharmaceuticals taking advantage? The world had already accepted state control and bodily autonomy. Or do you think the story goes further and the vaccine was intended to injure?
Personally - and this is speculation - the whole thing was intended for control. And the point is that they didn't *care* whether it killed. Because in their world, we are scum. We are idiots. We are not them so we can be dispensed with. So if the project works, they get control and the people love them. If it fails they will use the media against the people and it will take 40 years for the people to get recompense, by which time they have gone. This is literally what happened with thalidomide. This time the media must be brought to account. The media personalities who covered for them must be given life sentences at least. That is the only way that this ends. Individuals like Ben Fordham and Jim Wilson in Australia who advocated for mandates and lockdowns. And the celebrities who pushed the failed vaccines as a kind of advertising... like Dolly Parton and of course Albert Bourla. They must face an international criminal court. And if convicted of conspiracy to corporate manslaughter must face a life sentence. Unless this happens what you are seeing now will be just the tip of the iceberg
Schwab & his school of dimwits in power: Great Reset +
What are the odds of *this* being a random sequence:
1- Covid madness & lockdowns;
2- Mandatory-Vaccine vectored everything-disease Great Culling (on going);
3- A weird series of industrial plant explosions, mainly pharmaceutical & agro-food related (on going);
4- Russian provoked Ukraine war (on going, with probable extension);
5- "Western" suicidal Sanctions destroying essential world flows in Energy, Food & Fertilizers;
6- 40 billion USD worth of weaponry, to include long range missiles, being dumped haphazardly in aforementionned collapsed mafia land, pumped up with Chechens & Isis fighters;
7- What next?
"We do not yet know ze full extent and ze zystemic & ztrructural changes that will happen, however, we do know ze global energy zystems, food zystems & supply chains will be deeply affected."
As a hypothesis, it could be that, with the rapid development of all kinds of different medications in the late 20th century, it is known to pharmaceutical companies at this point that many of already approved and widely used medications will cause broad damage in aging patients. Now look at the list of adverse effects of the Pfizer vaccine, it takes several pages just to name them. If the majority of the aging population is bamboozled into signing a waiver for an EUA product whose adverse effects take several pages, they will not be able to blame their health problems onto approved medications they took throughout their lives. Therefore, no refunds
NE , why are they still pushing the jabs and ignoring the data ? It’s a bioweapon for depopulation and control in my opinion.
SARS2 was the trojan horse to introduce the jab. The jab is the bio weapon.
Just like Hiroshima and Nagasaki—they wanted to use the weapon as a real world test, flaws and all, just to see what happens. Lives damaged and lost and the wake of destruction are part of the show for them.
They will do it again unless they are stopped.
Davos and disease X. They want to hurry before we hold them accountable for Covid-19
Shi must have made SARS 1, after ofcourse WIV developed their first in house time machine!
MERS? Shi was in Baghdad directly following the first Gulf War... you tell me Shi didn't do it!
This falls within my prior WMD experience, for numerous reasons.
The primary thing I want to address, Naked Emperor, is your question regarding lockdowns/masks/etc.
Dr. Fauci certainly would be capable of coming up with such justifications for the lockdowns, but the FOIA evidence I've seen [which is all 126K pages of it] doesn't support that idea. The 105K of Baric emails mostly follow the email chains of the Red Dawn group that was swapping information and coordinating the general response behind the scenes. Carter Mecher, Eva [can't remember her last name], and a few others were big proponents of lockdowns; their template was mostly the 1918 H1N1 pandemic, not what was happening in Wuhan. There were a lot of comparisons of the progression and scale of the outbreaks in different cities, especially Philadelphia and St Louis, as I recall. The lesson was that the earlier a lockdown was implemented, the better. Wuhan simply proved their point because they compared it with other Chinese cities.
Fauci wasn't even in charge of the pandemic response at that point in time [in February], but once he was he was clearly on board with expanding emergency powers. It's exactly how he was able to practically institutionalize the scientific censorship.
I agree that the origins of SARS & MERS are suspicious [the Chinese thought the same thing about SARS], but there's far more evidence to support a natural origin with those two viruses than with this one. Dr. Quay's Bayesian Analysis [either version] references several pieces of evidence that attest to this; I know Arkmedic is familiar with its arguments so that's first place I'd recommend.
Personally, I think the orig of the 3 inserts is ultimately irrelevant, because the 4th is unequivocally artificial. Decroly calculated and reached the opposite conclusion of Pradhan & Montagnier for #'s 1-3, but at the end of the day no sarbecovirus could've recombined to provide the PRRA, and the genetic distance between CoV branches is to steep to accomodate that recombination.
I agree with Mona that RaTG13 and the two 'Z' species from Guangdong are most likely intermediate artificial constructs that show that they were trying to slowly construct something through passaging, before adding in the QTNSPRRA to finish the job.
As for SARS-CoV-2, the evidence points in the direction of a bioweapon. It is a very unique creation, in that strategically it falls outside the traditional definition of "incapacitating agent" because it appears likely to have broad 2nd & 3rd order effects [on immune systems, for example] and it is difficult to know what was intended vs. what has emerged through a twisted sort of 'luck.' I'm not a believer in the "reduction of global population argument," because that is a globalist perspective and neither China nor the US would've developed a pathogen toward that end. That doesn't mean that others could swoop in to take advantage of the crisis.
The pharmaceautical industry is motivated by money thus would have no interest in depopulation. Unfortunately the military are only interested in obliterating an enemy, and then we have people like Bill Gates who obsesses about over population. So there is a tension between differing viewpoints each with considerable power. This bioweapon was created possibly to produce an antidote for soldiers to continue fighting for long enough to get the job done. The civilian population has never been a consideration for the military. What interests me is the events in Shanghai and murmurs of an avian flu more deadly than anything we have seen. I have just read how millions of chickens and turkeys are being killed both in China and America to prevent the spread of a virus that hasn't happened. Obviously the intent is to continue unbalancing the population and create significant food shortages, prevent people from consuming meat in exchange for manufactured foodstuffs. As with the global warming crisis, the shift is being put into place before viable alternatives have been erected. This nonsense has yet to end and l am beginning to feel it never will. In spite of the excellent work some of you are doing in researching these materials and exposing them, we are sliding into an abyss from which there can be no escape.
Yes, I really think you have your finger on it when you talk about changes in food production and especially processing. Pharma has already waded into food production with protein supplements and are promoting them directly to the public through TV advertising. Protein supplements used to be for athletes and cancer patients. Now everyone drinks their protein. They can put anything in those “supplements” and people will drink them. They have killed millions of chickens and turkeys to stop bird flu, so apparently herd/flock immunity doesn’t matter with poultry. 🤷♀️
So would a particular unnamed Harvard graduate be missing the point? Or a shill?
Not sure what you mean
I don't think he's a shill, but he's also not a Harvard graduate.
He left Radcliffe at some point in his 3rd year, I believe.
The quasispecies is an important aspect of the discussion, but the FCS didn't emerge from it naturally like with what happens with influenza.
Most importantly, you wouldn't leave an FCS with a prion-like domain inside a vaccine candidate.
What do you mean the vaccine is continuously produced? Do you believe that the cells will continue to produce the spike protein forever or that people are continuing to get vaccinated?
The mRNA will eventually wane and the human body is amazing at detoxifying. Think Arsenic. If you don't keep up with administering it regularly the victim will be cured. It is like this with mRNA. It requires repeat administration. Sure there are short term disasters but if you survive that you will likely find that the effects wane. If you continue with the boosters you are taking a big risk.
Exactly. Nuremberg 2.0 can’t start soon enough.
🎯thank u Dr A!
Hiya,
My comments on the 'HIV' gp 120 and other issues I have with this presentation here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/absolute-proof-the-cellular-proteins
Jo
👏👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Banned for: (1) accusing of blocking without having been blocked, so I might as well block you and (2) accusing me of posting disinformation without any evidence to back up your statement.
Oh it's you. The answer to your questions are this:
(1) because I can spot a shill and their approach. There is a huge difference between a scientist who wants to discuss the science and a shill who is intent on disparaging and denigrating in order to impose their idea on others.
(2) the thread you are replying to is fully evidenced. As a shill your response is to frame your question with ridiculous assertions like "why do you keep pushing misleading theories?". I have not read beyond those words. It is not my fault that you don't understand the relevance of EK1C4 to the Gp-120 sequences, Baric and Daszak. It's nice that you have a role in life to shill for them but it's not useful to the world. I really hope that you can sleep at night taking on this role to try to push disinformation to protect those psychopaths. You are one of the people who I would consider more responsible for the genocide than even Daszak Shi and Fauci. Because you are happily going around trying to quash the truth with your ridiculous denigrations that never have any evidence. Please find another place to post your crap - your comments will be preserved. This is because all those people who contributed to Daszak's propaganda machine will eventually face investigation. We are patient.