11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Hari Seldon's avatar

The original intention could have been to develop a vaccine that could target the nucleocapsid and the RNA material within. You will note that most corona viruses, including the 'common flu', have a very similar nucleocapsid composition and can be attacked by T Cells (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00367-7) and from there the immune cascade with the T Cells developing a long term response i.e., if the idea worked then you could have a 'cure to the common cold' or certainly a better flu vaccine. What is interesting at this point are a couple of observations: people who have had the flu (as part of their medical history) are more resistant to Covid... thus supporting the stated assertion. One wonders why no vaccines have been produced that target the nucleocapsid? Patent issues I suspect.

It should be noted that targeting the nucleocapsid and a variety of other strategic points e.g., moieties on the viral envelope and well as the spike protein is one of the reasons why natural immunity is stronger than a vaccine (more points of differentiation) - and there is no money in everyone realising that natural herd immunity is the way forward... however, this idea provides ample explanation as to why the 'unvaxxed' get persecuted - they are standing in the way of profit.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

One other interesting observation about influenza (which is also manufactured) is that the 2009 influenza produced a super immunity. Anybody that had that "swine flu" is super immune to flu viruses. It seems they have been down this pathway before, and it worked, but that then kills off their finance stream for flu vaccines (which Cochrane says are useless)

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Indeed, one of the clues for me, a former “normie” was realising per Cochrane that ‘flu vaccination, at a population level, has no benefit (except to the vaccine makers & anyone else paid off along the way).

I remember feeling unmoored. Really peculiar. Because this meant every institution involved in the process new that they didn’t work. Probably not the individual doctors, but nobody cared about that. Doctors are no longer regarded as skilled.

I wish I’d not just ignored that peculiar feeling.

I thank you for your informative article. Only those who accept coincidences without realising it’s just not possible to do so think the virus sequence is natural.

One question. Is there really a novel coronavirus moving through the population?

Just because there’s such a sequence lodged doesn’t automatically mean it’s at large across the world.

A friend in the former eastern bloc, who works in public health, designing PCR tests, is firm in their view that there’s been more than one apparent release.

The logic is that the three waves in their country are impossible to have descended one from the other. The last wave, sequenced using NGS, apparently back tracked to an earlier form, lost several mutations, then gained some new ones!

I question whether there really is a new respiratory virus because there are already scores of them that we’re not looking for (in people with symptoms). It’s no big deal though. The most outrageous discoveries don’t raise eyebrows these days. That’s one of the things I find most surprising. How has almost every journalist & almost every doctor & scientist chosen to look at their shoes for two years? Money? Fear?

Expand full comment
Stoichastic's avatar

They found reliable cross reactivity for Sars-Cov-2 as well in that cohort yeah?

Now I want to get swine flu haha. Living in Australia unvaxed is pretty ordinary these days.

Expand full comment
Stacy Otto, fka Eudora's avatar

Thank you for bringing this up, dear Dr Ah Kahn Syed! I recall a paper quite a while back that I believe explained that there was a sequence in common with H1N1 of 2008 and that those infected at the time enjoyed immunity from early SARS-CoV-2. I had begun to believe I imagined that connection (old phone with poor screenshot capacity, alas). You are a truly gifted pedagogue. Sending you very best wishes and wishing you all good things.

Expand full comment
Hari Seldon's avatar

can I send you some additional information? Send me a contact email address that you are comfortable with...

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

gab.com/arkmedic is probably the safest. Chat is encrypted. I'll be busy this week though

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

I've been reading these comments again and thought that Novavax was heading in the right direction. Their vaccine was a traditional system but l've heard nothing about it for a while. Do you know if it is being offered? Side effects and efficacy?

Expand full comment
Joel Rosenblum's avatar

Same toxicity as the other jabs, injecting yourself with spike protein. But maybe less long-term toxicity since no mrna factory injected. Completely unnecessary since vit C megadosing cures pretty much every pathogenic illness aside from some parasitic ones.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

This was supposed to be safer since l understood it to be a traditional vax rather than a spike protein based jab. l shall continue to wait until the required 5 years or so of tests are completed, having more faith in vitamin C and D than an arm that looks like a pin cushion.

Expand full comment
Charles's avatar

Spot on. All of the vaccines to date have used the virus aimed at in its entirety in order to allow the immune system to 'inspect' the mRNA and its capsule. Some vaccines like smallpox proved quite dangerous as l can testify. But this pales into insignificance when a novel approach is possible and everyone falls in love with it.

Expand full comment