My apologies, I should have made my question more clear.
First, if I understand your tweets correctly, sequence 1652 (and/or 1651), as listed in the patent supplement file, are versions of MSH3, and thus the 19nt of the FCS is a fragment of the reverse compliment of the coding strand of engineered MSH3. Second, if I understand your substack correctly, you are claiming (I am fleshing out [expanding] my interpretation of your claim) that the Wuhan lab received a cell line (from Moderna) that contained an engineered MSH3 that was cloned into a plasmid vector (or integrated into a chromosome). Third, the Wuhan lab subsequently transfected this cell line the SARS2 precursor backbone, as DNA in a cloning vector (or as the actual RNA virus).
When I ask if it is a "natural recombination event", I mean did host (or viral) DNA (or RNA) repair enzymes excise 19nt from engineered MSH3 and insert them into the SARS2 precursor ? Or did a polymerase jump from the precursor SARS2 template onto an MSH3 template and then jump back to the viral template? Or some other recombination mechanism that I don't know about? By "natural" I also specify an event within a cell, ie., in vivo. By "natural" I mean a mechanism with host/viral enzymes, somewhat random, with the recombinant virus taking over via Darwinian selection upon repeated subculture. By "natural", I do not imply that transfection of a cell line with an engineered MSH3, followed by transfection with SARS2 precursor, was in itself a natural event.
In contrast, by an "engineered" FCS, I mean that 19nt directly came from a DNA synthesizer, mixed with DNA from the SARS2 precursor backbone (cloned into a vector), ligated, all in vitro, and the product transfected into a host cell, the host transcribing the DNA construct, and thus generating a new virus. Since I am an oldster, I am coming from the olden days when they would have used restriction enzymes and the 19nt DNA fragment may have had overhangs (but it could have been via blunt ligation); but I am trying to allow for newfangled direct synthesis methods that I haven't kept up with.
By "natural", it could also mean that the FCS insert was an "accident", maybe not planned. Culturing SARS2 precursor in a cell line containing MSH3 could accelerate mutation rates and thus be good for gain of function research. That engineered MSH3 has a nice FCS sequence in the complimentary strand, and that this compliment fragment got into the SARS2 precursor, may not have been planned.
By "engineered", I imply that some planning was involved. They saw the ArgSer pair defined the FCS site of SARS1 and wanted to "improve it". The "semi-planned" approach involves the creation of "gazillions" of random sequences with a DNA synthesizer, and inserting them near the original FCS site of SARS1. Out of millions one would replicate faster, and we get SARS2. The "fully-planned" approach looks at FCS from all the other coronoviruses, and all the FCS sites from other organisms, in order to define FCS motifs. Hundreds of motif variants are synthesized and tested, and one of them becomes SARS2.
My recollection (correct me if I am wrong) is that the DRASTIC leaks of the proposal showed that they wanted to play with FCS motifs. This sounds like "planning", not "accident". But to me, recombination of a 19nt fragment of the compliment of MHS3 seems more like an accident.
We can rescue the concept of "planning" if the 19nt compliment fragment of MHS3, and the 19nt coding fragment of SARS, both come from an unknown third source. But if it is from a third source, why did Moderna work so hard to choose codons in the coding strand of MHS3 to enable the incorporation of a strong FCS (that "very special FCS") in its compliment? What were they doing? I just don't get it!?!?!?
I have two other comments, one you may like very much, the other probably not so much.
Nice comment. I think any of those are possible, but all of them require lab interference. Much of it beyond that is chicken-and-egg speculation. Direct spicing is possible but you would think they would not then have left overhang traces and just used the 12nt needed... Sometimes you need to overhang for it to work and they had not choice. Alternatively there was cotransfection and they accidentally came up with a novel virus... I think it doesn't matter. The proof is that it didn't come about by nature and the fault lies with them. Eventually someone will sing to save their behind.
Have you looked into the summer of 2019 Greenspring Village & Heatherwood Care home mystery respiratory virus outbreaks? Then Fort Detrick, 1 hr away shuts down suddenly for bs safety reasons. Also a vaping pneumonia started circulating in the US around the same time. I think it leaked from Fort Detrick sometime in 2019. Anyways, China has been calling for an investigation into this. Funny it has been hidden from the public discourse. Evidence is pretty damning. A lot of ppl got sick, some died, CDC couldn't find a cause supposedly. The care home residents were sent a memo but family members weren't notified. Some said their parents with dementia were told but the family wasn't alerted. They found out from the news. Sounds like a coverup to me.
I am really curious about the rash of vaping pneumonias and deaths. DTRA or DOD was known to have been testing vaping as a vehicle for gene therapies. I am deeply suspicious that there were some tests here and there of some unwitting citizens.
I know this is an incredibly dated comment, but I'd say the new endonuclease fingerprint paper shows the human intent behind the construction of the spike, since the FCS can so easily be excised, and even leaves out the conserved Arginine (only put in what you need in relation to the virus you're experimenting with, right? Looks efficient). Exact lab practices I personally know little about still however, but I'd say the "accidental" nature you implied is less likely than purposeful construction
I don't remember us being able to find REs that could splice that exact fragment when looking at that 2+ years ago, which is why the MSH3 paper made more sense. But happy to be proven wrong.
I'm not well versed enough in genetics or lab practices to vet the arguments honestly. But from my inexperienced perspective the endo fingerprint paper seemed sound, as did Mckernan's subsequent takedown of the zoocrew's public "debunking" (which is what the article I provided was). You should read both in that case (if you get the time of course), the restriction enzyme map appears to excise that fragment in a way that again, appears rather efficient to me, and indicates knowledge of other coronaviruses (as the ending R they leave behind is conserved across ronas, pretty sure it's the final R of PRRAR, though again haven't looked in a couple months). I can't remember exactly where the enzyme map sits in relation to the other GP 120 inserts that are clustered in the N terminal domain though. The preprint should also be in the article I posted
This work should be the subject of a real congressional hearing. The data are damn near irrefutable. As a scientist, I am continually astounded that more scientists are not speaking up about this.
R.F.Kennedy Jr, Tucker Carlson, Truckers in Canada, Peter McCullough, RW Malone, protesters around the globe. It's not like there are none ...
Ultimately scientists need to speak out.
The whole political/WEF/vaccine BS rests on the premise that the science says this is the right thing to do. This shit is comparable to what the nazis did so yes, if scientists do not speak out basically they are facilitating a mass murder. They won't even lose their job, maybe just the BMGF/Welcome Trust funding. Not speaking out while knowing very well that countless people are dying and the gain of function is still being done worldwide is despicable to say the least
Jan 14, 2022·edited Jan 14, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
I don't want to ask for speculation beyond what you feel is reasonable based on the evidence, but this leads to some very big questions. There were suggestions early on that the HIV inserts could be indicative of target epitopes for developing prototype HIV vaccine (I think Montaignier mentioned this.) However, why would they then make the whole chimeric virus much more dangerous with the insertion of the furin cleavage site if they were just making target practice virus for testing vaccine concepts? Why not use an animal adapted spike with your HIV epitopes so the whole experiment is FAR less dangerous?
What I'm getting at: is there still a plausible and somewhat benign explanation for why they might graft these characteristics together? The more manipulations are discovered, the more it looks to me like the goal was a virulent human infectious chimeric virus with the added advantage of 'plug-and-play' spike protein that could be swapped out to target different cell receptors or target populations; i.e. the holy-grail of modern bioweapon.
So is there still some legitimate purpose excuse available? Could this have been HIV vaccine research or some sort of cancer vaccine research? Could it have been the DEFUSE 'bat vaccine?'
EDIT: Put simply: the explanation that they were just looking for the next human pandemic potential bat virus falls apart when their chimeric virus had THIS MANY manipulations. So what were they attempting?
If I am answering the right question I'll say this. The intention was to create a bioweapon that would not kill off the future slave population (young people) which is why it needed to be SARS based. They knew they had an antidote in HCQ so they were safe. The purpose is a one-world economy (aka great reset aka agenda 2030) which is global fascism. This is not conspiracy theory - this is what the WEF have said they are aiming for, it's just that it's so obviously fascist socialism that people are told not to believe it and they don't because they are in a mass psychosis. It's how the elites (aka oligarchy aka cabal aka WEF aka CFR) have always run things when they can get away with it. So they take a SARS virus, put in (by intention or accident) a FCS for which they have an antidote (folate, HCQ) and HIV epitopes to help evade the immune system (SARS was too immunogenic so died off quickly) and then imposed public health restrictions that ensured the spread of the virus was prolonged artificially. That provided the fear factor so they could get their digital passport system in. It's working well tbh
Thank you. I feel like there it is now nearly impossible to contrive a believable explanation for the experiments that created SARS-COV-2 other than something very dark like what you say.
This hypothesis is gaining significant traction. What I need clarification about is who gains and in what way when the world population is so drastically altered? The indiscriminate killing of intelligent and well educated people who can potentially advance humanity to the next level appears to me a nihilistic endeavour. If I wanted to improve the situation this planet finds itself in, I would do my utmost to save the truly productive at the expense of the rest. Simply wanting to have slaves cater for my needs is not adequate. I would require stimulus. Artists, musicians, scientists and on a more basic level, dentists to ensure I do not expire prematurely from a banal tooth abscess. So then, just what do these people hope to achieve? Or are they, inexplicably, just egocentric morons?
There is a reason for all this insanity - not a reason such as normal people have in mind - but the rollout for this depravity is within ten years. There is little time left, if we do not stop it in the year 22, it will not be stoppable anymore.
I suppose if there is an understandable aim to it all, it is simply to reduce the human population to what is considered a reasonable level. But the methods are crude in the extreme and do not appeal to my sense of elegance.
Hubris. They thing that they have stored knowledge in AI and databases and don't need the skilled master class of people to teach or practice the knowledge.
In Canada, it is 82. I think they overshot the average age mark imo. I think if they wanted to kill off conservatives and leave only super-liberal types, they should have aimed for an average kill age of 60 with a 50% mortality rate at that age bracket. Leaving a lot of children, teens, many under 40s and some 50s to 60s to educate the next-generation/pass along their skills.
Actually the figure was I think, 82 years old. Pretty much all of them had other problems too. Unfortunately if you want to kill off a couple of billion people, being specific would give the game away. An ideal situation would be eliminating the weak, disabled and the old. A work force of fit young people is necessary to ensure your version after this carnage of a 'civilised society" is maintained, the challenge then is to stabilise the population at the level you deem is required, yet maintaining the lifestyle you so richly deserve. The planning so far has been a shambles. If the population is decimated, there is no need to attempt a carbon-free future. No need to waste billions on futile power generation from wind turbines and Chinese solar panels. In fact , looking at the aims objectively, it is as usual ill planned, illogical and rather ridiculous.
See, that once again, doesn't make sense to me. Throughout the entire pandemic, worldwide, I think covid has killed less than like 10 mil people. 8 mil compared to 7 billion is a drop in the bucket. Its like 0.1%? If they are planning to drop the population to 500 million, they need about an 92% reduction. So making 0.1% progress there is literately, a single drop in a glass.
Thoughts on the ideal population numbers are nothing new. It has been discussed for the past 100 years and plans formulated to enact it. We have seen a couple of efforts put into it-a couple of world wars, swine flu, but wars are too destructive and disease could not be successfully tried until the understanding of how viruses work and how to counter them came along. Now the conceit that we understand microbes well has put this plan into action. There is more than one aim to it all. The world banks will be amalgamated and the people introduced to the joy of social credit. The drug companies are seeking a maximum profit to go into the brave new world. That is the weakness, not all want the same thing, But this is a long haul attack. If you can kill off a few million over the next 10 years or so, destroy the immune system of the rest, they become your slaves for the rest of their lives. It is quite perfect if the imagination and hubris is there to do such a thing. All of the main payers are paid off in some way. No interest at all from the international media for example. Listening to these talking heads, it's astounding just how brainless they are and the instigators for the large part are psychopaths and have no empathy. I have no idea what the figure to aim for is, it might be a billion....l guess l shall have to ask Bill Gates.
Just been reading through these older posts. The fact that these jabs are being pushed for very young children suggests that no part of the population is to be spared. Get rid of European populations who use far more energy than Africa and you have a breathing space to reorganise 'civilisation.' There does appear to be at least two factions at work pushing different agendas. One is merely after a great deal of money ( just what they intend to spend it on after everything has crashed is beyond me) the other is philosophical but no less dangerous. The infatuation with new technology, computer models for everything and a touching faith in their understanding of what they are doing will be their downfall.
Bingo. That is why they are going after the Western countries and wanting to eliminate that standard of living. Destroying energy infrastructure, farms.
In light of this, what do you think of Omicron? Did it evolve naturally or was it yet another engineered and controlled release?
The effect of Omicron seems to be the opposite of what the elites were pushing for the last two years - constant fear and the narrative that the only salvation is getting vaccinated. Omicron seems to be milder, at least in the short run, so people are not so afraid of it. The vaccines are totally worthless with Omicron, which undermines the push for mandating them and controlling the mandates with vaxx passports.
Technically the arguments (too few synonymous mutations) seem to be in favour of another la-bat-ory event but what is the motivation for it?
Viruses change through time and these changes cannot be predictable. Omicron is one of those changes that can be predicted to a degree. It is pointless killing your host. Being mild enables your host to continue living and you the virus thrive. Ultimately, becoming part of your host's DNA is the dream of all dreams.
When one constructs dozens of viruses to introduce into polite society, if distracted and the pin falls out of the naming board it's easy to re-install the pin out of sequence. It won't happen again.
I know this rings true, but always bracing to see it stated so starkly in writing. It was clear to me right away that flattening the curve meant prolonging the event and delaying natural herd immunity.
Also, if the cleavage site sequence came from oncology research and is from "MSH3_mutated cell lines designed for developing cancer vaccines," then what to make of this?
That paper is damning, which I suspect is why they are trying to get it taken offline. However it doesn't relate to the original genomics of the virus. It is about the effect of the spike protein
I'm no microbiologist, but my reaction after reading that paper is "the DNA damage repair being broken by spike protein is similar to radiation sickness...people die from the inside out!"
Dr. Can I ask you an off-topic question? Do the PCR tests (of which there are many) find DNA/RNA that is exclusive to SARS COV 2, or is the DNA/RNA sequence that binds to the PCR test also present in other viruses? Also I was told that some PCR tests look for a sequence that is part of the Spike protein. Does this mean that they could accidently test positive for the spike produced by the vaccine, rather than the spike produced by the virus? Thanks for any light you can shed on these issues.
In general they should be specific for that virus. Most of them have test result included for cross-reactivity to other similar viruses. Some of the labs were only testing for S-gene but more reliable tests are for 3-genes (e.g. S, E, N). With omicron the S-gene test fails
I develop these PCR tests, primarily ones that are multiplexed to be able detect and differentiate Sars-CoV-2, flu A, flu B, and RSV all at same time. Easily distinguishable, and you would not be able to detect spike mRNA from vaccine in nose cells, besides the nucleocapsid is also tested.
The PCR test was never meant to 'detect' - it is solely intended to AMPLIFY existing strings of nucleotides. Why a pcr test is being 'developed' and, moreover, used to 'test' for the presence of a computer-model 'virus' is beyond me. And corroborates the mindboggling deception around the entire 'covid' scam.
Dear Dr Ah Kahn Syed - first a compliment and note for fellow laymen, then a question.
Thank you for the clearest presentation yet regarding the lab origin of the virus with reference to the genetic code. As a layman, I had great difficulty understanding this line of argument in the past when it first arose, but with your screenshots I was able to follow along with the BLAST repository and verify the identical sequences by myself. It's unlikely we'd see this kind of analysis in any accessible media so it's to your credit that there is a logical explanation of what's involved. For those who are having trouble with the "CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG" part (the final search referenced in this article), use this tool to produce the reverse complement: https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/rev_comp.html It gives "CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG". Then when you search one of the Moderna patents from 2015 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/HZ246785.1 , go down to the "2761" area and you will see the exact sequence with the first letter starting at the end of the previous line. (If I'm wrong here, please correct).
Second, I understand how this would mean that this virus's origin would be a non-random event, and that this would mean it is man-made.
If you are willing to speculate though, or able to clarify, what does this suggest about the relation between Moderna and the lab?
You write "In order for that sequence to have arisen in that virus" it "had to have had been infected into patented cell lines supplied by Moderna that had that unique sequence not seen in any other virus."
Is it only the case that the patent cell lines could have been supplied by Moderna?
Or is it possible that the lab researchers read Moderna's patent and devised to copy that component by themselves? Or is this possible but a much less likely explanation?
I've never done lab work so I don't know if that's possible or feasible.
>"As described herein, a useful feature of the oncology-related polynucleotides, primary constructs or mmRNA of the invention is the capacity to reduce, evade or avoid the innate immune response of a cell."
>"While in some circumstances, it might be advantageous to eliminate the innate immune response in a cell, the invention provides polynucleotides, primary constructs and mmRNA that upon administration result in a substantially reduced (significantly less) the immune response, including interferon signaling, without entirely eliminating such a response."
>"Provided herein, in part, are oncology-related polynucleotides, oncology-related primary constructs and/or oncology-related mmRNA encoding oncology-related polypeptides of interest which have been designed to improve one or more of the stability and/or clearance in tissues, receptor uptake and/or kinetics, cellular access by the compositions, engagement with translational machinery, mRNA half-life, translation efficiency, immune evasion, protein production capacity, secretion efficiency (when applicable), accessibility to circulation, protein half-life and/or modulation of a cell's status, function and/or activity."
Therefore, regarding the particular sequence in the virus, which is identical to the one in the patent, does this mean the addition of the sequence would be to enhance the immune system evasion of the virus? Or that it was added as part of the virus to help prevent the body from breaking it down?
Not sure if you can speculate from the patent and sequence like that, but it would help contextualize things.
Thank you very much and I hope you can help enlighten me and the other laymen readers who may have similar questions.
Dear John, thank you for this excellent and informative comment and question! The reverse complement tool link is really useful for those who are scratching their heads.
In regards to how it arrived there, this would just be speculation. The problem is that Moderna are the most suspicious company in existence. They never produced a viable drug yet have thousands of patents for mutated human genes. From a bioethics standpoint they should have been shut down years ago. They have never contributed to a single saved life and now it seems they have contributed to mass death only (and that includes the net effect of the mRNA spike protein "vaccine" looking at Norman Fenton and Martin Neil's excellent data analysis). So the assumption has to be that they have provided the relevant cell lines to the Wuhan lab.
I was in the field (raising equity financing for a biotech) around the same time Moderna was doing the same. I was as sure as I could be that they were fraudulent. Similarly with Elizabeth Holmes’ Theranos, Bancel prompted in me an immediate assessment as a liar.
Bancel doesn’t have the right background & expertise to front a cutting edge biotech like this. I know enough about mRNA as a tool to know it isn’t sufficiently controllable to make it as a medical intervention in the same way a small molecule drug might. Not now & not ever.
As an old school drug discovery person, I knew that the whole approach lacks the means of controlling outcome after injection. Unavoidably variable results including lots of effects we couldn’t anticipate.
So the entire concept was fraudulent. At least, it is unless you don’t mind unsafe interventions.
Several venture fund partners I pitched to had money in Moderna. One I got to know well enough to ask went quiet when I challenged on the fundamental technology. My gathering sense was there was way too much money going into Moderna (& companies with related technologies) to make economic sense.
Wy do l get the impression that l am listening at a keyhole. There is so much information available if one cares to look for it. I visited a supermarket this morning and chatted to a few staff members. They all agree our facial fashion statements were BS but couldn't enunciate why. It's fascinating that even the most basic education can still produce a vague understanding that all is not well. One customer even went one better than us conformists, she had glittery things sewn onto her mask. Obviously she plans on wearing it forever.
Thank you for the reply! Yes the sudden rise of Moderna relative to their lackluster business prior to covid is also a strange element of this lab leak constellation.
Also, your article is generating a lot more discussion.
It was also posted several times on Reddit today. Please do not be disheartened by its location in the 'conspiracy' subreddit. Unfortunately anything contrary to the establishment narrative is only able to be shared in that subreddit because the Reddit moderators are overzealous in banning anyone who questions the vaccine's merits/virus origin/lockdowns' validity.
That last one has someone (PseudoDave) trying to 'debunk' your article but I don't think he addresses any of the core claims. That is, not addressing the search of the sequence in the *viruses* specifically, not addressing the exact 19n match, and appeals to ignorance about what BLAST may or may not contain from nature.
Anyway, perhaps if you have some time later, maybe you can write an expansion of this article, taking down the common but uninformed attacks. I would be extremely interested in any follow up as I imagine the knee-jerk criticisms being slung are of the 'fact-check' variety - that is, dismissive smears that don't deal with the main points at all. As I believe that if the virus was man made (extremely likely) then this has enormous implications for the last two years, and proves an inescapable guilt for those in power performing heinous acts on the populace, and this origin explanation is something that should be solidified logically for everyone who is demanding justice and answers.
Jan 16, 2022·edited Jan 16, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Thank you, I would be very interested to read it. I read your response to "SK". It seems like there is a usual strawman against the lab origin/sequence match argument that he and others use. These strawmen arguments against you are not compelling given that they doesn't address the points you make but I hope your next elucidations of the thesis can further dispel the uninformed criticisms.
If you can BLAST your way to the truth lets see your paper published by the BMJ after a peer review or are you going to hide behind a name which is a forgery? How do we know you are a PhD?
It has been decades since I worked in a lab, but I did look in occasionally, usually to a diagnostic lab.
Recall that CDC initially (early 2020) provided incorrect probes for spike protein antigens ( I had an article from S Korea.) Recall that synthesising a string of nucleotides is relatively accessible, these are, after all , the probes for the PCR tests.
Combine that with CRISPR techniques and you should be able to construct what you need.
Knowing what you need 2 years before the event might be construed as cheating, in sailboat racing we describe this as "Over Early", now penalised as OCS.
In the innocent days, years before all of this nonsense, several of us took my yacht out onto the Waitamata in Auckland New Zealand on Wednesday nights for pizza and rum and cokes. The racing fraternity would scrape under our ponderous progress with shouts of "Starboard" to which I would shout back "Steel!" It didn't take them too many Wednesdays to tender some respect. Weight is power!
"Science is not based on assumption." That is precisely why Dr Ah Kahn Syed clearly stated he was making an assumption. I'm sure he was hoping that by stating it so clearly, no readers would leap to the idea that he was promulgating a fact, which would therefore require one or more verifying citation. Evidently, he was wrong in that hope.
So this is your conclusion for the article which shows evidence and proof for every step in the process? You don't have to agree with it. What would be less disingenuous is if you offered alternative explanations for the above findings. Otherwise you're just a troll
I apologize, Dr Ah Khan Syed, if I was unclear in expressing myself. The "fact" I was referring to related to Moderna having "provided the relevant cell lines to the Wuhan lab." If we had a video of a FedEX driver dropping off a package at the Wuhan lab, and zooming in on the package we could see it labeled as "19 Nucleotide sequence for creating a furin cleavage site" and FROM: Moderna ...we would have an actual, provable "fact" rather than a supposition.
What you provided us with was the equivalent of: "Mr. Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, having broken down the locked library door, discovered the butler standing over the lifeless body of Lord Cuthbert, still stabbing him with the Corinthian dagger the butler was known always to carry upon his person." Thus, the "assumption" that the butler did it being true is as near to a "fact" as one could get, absent a video of the actual moment Lord Cuthbert expired. And in the case of the Moderna sequences, your assumption is borne out by the staggering mathematics of sheer chance having resulted in the inclusion.
And to compound this unlikelihood, imagine this news announcement: "Researchers looking into SARScov2 using BLAST have discovered that a 19 character long sequence therein exactly matches with a section of a patented gene. The patent was filed by a small research group looking to develop a soybean better adapted to climate change. What are the odds?!"
What are the odds that the patent was filed by a company that—according to them—came up with a vaccine against SARScov2 in a matter of two days?
What's even more surprising about all of this to me is, continuing the metaphor, that the butler never got arrested.
I'm somewhat lost in your analogies but appreciate your time. Moderna claimed the sequence (MSH3_mut) in their submission to the Genbank patent database. Now, they either supplied the cell line knowingly, unknowingly, or the sequence was used without their permission in a locally made cell line despite Moderna registering that gene in the genbank patent database.
The original intention could have been to develop a vaccine that could target the nucleocapsid and the RNA material within. You will note that most corona viruses, including the 'common flu', have a very similar nucleocapsid composition and can be attacked by T Cells (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00367-7) and from there the immune cascade with the T Cells developing a long term response i.e., if the idea worked then you could have a 'cure to the common cold' or certainly a better flu vaccine. What is interesting at this point are a couple of observations: people who have had the flu (as part of their medical history) are more resistant to Covid... thus supporting the stated assertion. One wonders why no vaccines have been produced that target the nucleocapsid? Patent issues I suspect.
It should be noted that targeting the nucleocapsid and a variety of other strategic points e.g., moieties on the viral envelope and well as the spike protein is one of the reasons why natural immunity is stronger than a vaccine (more points of differentiation) - and there is no money in everyone realising that natural herd immunity is the way forward... however, this idea provides ample explanation as to why the 'unvaxxed' get persecuted - they are standing in the way of profit.
One other interesting observation about influenza (which is also manufactured) is that the 2009 influenza produced a super immunity. Anybody that had that "swine flu" is super immune to flu viruses. It seems they have been down this pathway before, and it worked, but that then kills off their finance stream for flu vaccines (which Cochrane says are useless)
Indeed, one of the clues for me, a former “normie” was realising per Cochrane that ‘flu vaccination, at a population level, has no benefit (except to the vaccine makers & anyone else paid off along the way).
I remember feeling unmoored. Really peculiar. Because this meant every institution involved in the process new that they didn’t work. Probably not the individual doctors, but nobody cared about that. Doctors are no longer regarded as skilled.
I wish I’d not just ignored that peculiar feeling.
I thank you for your informative article. Only those who accept coincidences without realising it’s just not possible to do so think the virus sequence is natural.
One question. Is there really a novel coronavirus moving through the population?
Just because there’s such a sequence lodged doesn’t automatically mean it’s at large across the world.
A friend in the former eastern bloc, who works in public health, designing PCR tests, is firm in their view that there’s been more than one apparent release.
The logic is that the three waves in their country are impossible to have descended one from the other. The last wave, sequenced using NGS, apparently back tracked to an earlier form, lost several mutations, then gained some new ones!
I question whether there really is a new respiratory virus because there are already scores of them that we’re not looking for (in people with symptoms). It’s no big deal though. The most outrageous discoveries don’t raise eyebrows these days. That’s one of the things I find most surprising. How has almost every journalist & almost every doctor & scientist chosen to look at their shoes for two years? Money? Fear?
Thank you for bringing this up, dear Dr Ah Kahn Syed! I recall a paper quite a while back that I believe explained that there was a sequence in common with H1N1 of 2008 and that those infected at the time enjoyed immunity from early SARS-CoV-2. I had begun to believe I imagined that connection (old phone with poor screenshot capacity, alas). You are a truly gifted pedagogue. Sending you very best wishes and wishing you all good things.
I've been reading these comments again and thought that Novavax was heading in the right direction. Their vaccine was a traditional system but l've heard nothing about it for a while. Do you know if it is being offered? Side effects and efficacy?
Same toxicity as the other jabs, injecting yourself with spike protein. But maybe less long-term toxicity since no mrna factory injected. Completely unnecessary since vit C megadosing cures pretty much every pathogenic illness aside from some parasitic ones.
This was supposed to be safer since l understood it to be a traditional vax rather than a spike protein based jab. l shall continue to wait until the required 5 years or so of tests are completed, having more faith in vitamin C and D than an arm that looks like a pin cushion.
Spot on. All of the vaccines to date have used the virus aimed at in its entirety in order to allow the immune system to 'inspect' the mRNA and its capsule. Some vaccines like smallpox proved quite dangerous as l can testify. But this pales into insignificance when a novel approach is possible and everyone falls in love with it.
Jan 14, 2022·edited Jan 14, 2022Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed
The spike protein was reverse engineered by the University of North Carolina for the Wuhan lab to study human-mouse hybrids: infectivity and immune response. The head of the Wuhan Lab and also head of the Chinese CDC is Mr GAO. He has 25 patents, all biotech related, and is an expert in both bat virology and infectious diseases... and I am guessing Mr GAO, with the right incentives (money and influence) is someone not worried about doing research that would be illegal in the US --- but OK in China and possibly of utility to the CCP - of which he is a senior member). His bio is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._Gao
Umm. Maybe you would like to look at Fauci's request to DARPA for bat coronavirus research in Wuhan leaked by project Veritas.
The exact range research was eventually performed Fauci's your friend and ceo of EcoHealth went on to do... In Wuhan with a grant Fauci allegedly pushed through. At the same time as an infectious disease, filled with the same genetics as US parents, appeared in Wuhan with no intermediate carriers or animals in between Wuhan and the cage 3000km away where the bats with the pre gain of function research resided.
It does appear that this was the case since this kind of experimentation was outlawed in the US. There are now strong suggestions that experimental labs were also set up in Ukraine doing similar work for the US. As they say... the thlot plickens....
He went to university and is good pals with Sir Jeremy Farrar. Gao was also involved in event 201 which was funded by Bill and Melinda Foundation as well as WEF.
Thank you for breaking this down so clearly, and keeping the pressure on. When this madness ends it will be thanks to efforts like yours that break the camel's back.
Thank you for an essay relatively accessible to the layman. I have a good general education, but specialization in computer science. As such I am familiar with data sequences and degrees of probability. Your and earlier work showing the "fingerprints" of likely manipulation lend just more evidence to the claim that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab.
For the record, much other circumstantial evidence exists. Two of the biggest (to me) were the very odd behaviors of the Chinese in early 2020 once news of the virus broke. Scrubbed databases, threats to medical workers and (reportedly) disappeared personnel as well as lack of cooperation for outside investigations alone make them look guilty. Add to this NIH's (NIAID, etc.) very odd behavior ca. Feb. 2020 as documented in the mid-2021 FOIA-ed emails of Fauci et al. Allowing for some inferences due to incomplete information, he and others went to extraordinary lengths to dissuade anyone from raising the chance of a lab accident, culminating in the Lancet article soon after.
You would have to live in a cabbage patch to believe this virus did NOT come from a lab. Surely investigations such as your could be replicated. I don't know if they could meet the rigors of scientific proof, but someone deserves a Nobel or at least a Pulitzer for reporting and documenting this story. Even if such a report were accomplished, however, I am skeptical whether thoroughly corrupt institutions would ever concede the truth.
Wow. Stunning stuff, and clear enough for a layperson to follow. The lack of curiosity in the mainstream is still baffling, particularly in light of the (email)exposure of Fauci's conspiracy to discredit the lab leak hypothesis and push the pangolin-bat party fantasy.
Any truth to the idea of a snake neurotoxin insert on S1 also? I'm sure there was something written about a prion, too.
The "lack of curiosity" is fueled by the ginormous financial stranglehold Big Pharma has on the mainstream media and on politicians. The late '90's law that allowed direct to consumer advertising by drug companies has made a huge difference, though not the only factor.
This is beyond GoF. This is a molecular WMD. The former implies recklessness, the latter premeditation. #molecularWMD would be a surefire way to nuke your Twitter account.
Amazing this didn't take off as soon as you posted.
One way to square the circle between this and the Baric and Shi work going back decades - Moderna had access to the code in 2017 as part of collusion with the protein's original designers. They might not have even been aware of the significance with the virus when it emerged and when they were tapped to produce the transfections, or they were more like a novice tagging along in a bank heist at any rate. They needed money, did what they were told.
Are the HIV epitopes immune camouflage, or T Cell infiltration machines, or just would-be HIV vaccine designs slapped onto a coronavirus in 2001 that were found to have interesting pathology during the SARS release? Perhaps they were just designed to spook people out, so that the closer society got to the truth, the more we would become afraid and latch onto another promised vaccine exit. Germaphobia dies hard. Look at Cottrell - serious Howard Hughes vibes.
HIV epitopes are immune camouflage IMHO. The question is which came first? I think they had already developed a HIV-studded coronavirus and they just needed to get something in there that would enable an antidote. Then it became a bioweapon.
B"H" Thank you. This much-needed information, as well as details on the Moderna patents, has been sent to members of the Japanese Diet (Parliament). Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock a .de .dk poet, 18c wrote "Yet History will rise in her due time and speak her piece. And after she has spoken, all preceding claptrap will be of no more consequence."
And as I said: It is in the merit of the Righteous women we will all be redeemed.
Taking a MSH3 mutated cell line and co transfecting it with a SARS like coronavirus cannot be called a "natural recombination event" in anyone's book.
My apologies, I should have made my question more clear.
First, if I understand your tweets correctly, sequence 1652 (and/or 1651), as listed in the patent supplement file, are versions of MSH3, and thus the 19nt of the FCS is a fragment of the reverse compliment of the coding strand of engineered MSH3. Second, if I understand your substack correctly, you are claiming (I am fleshing out [expanding] my interpretation of your claim) that the Wuhan lab received a cell line (from Moderna) that contained an engineered MSH3 that was cloned into a plasmid vector (or integrated into a chromosome). Third, the Wuhan lab subsequently transfected this cell line the SARS2 precursor backbone, as DNA in a cloning vector (or as the actual RNA virus).
When I ask if it is a "natural recombination event", I mean did host (or viral) DNA (or RNA) repair enzymes excise 19nt from engineered MSH3 and insert them into the SARS2 precursor ? Or did a polymerase jump from the precursor SARS2 template onto an MSH3 template and then jump back to the viral template? Or some other recombination mechanism that I don't know about? By "natural" I also specify an event within a cell, ie., in vivo. By "natural" I mean a mechanism with host/viral enzymes, somewhat random, with the recombinant virus taking over via Darwinian selection upon repeated subculture. By "natural", I do not imply that transfection of a cell line with an engineered MSH3, followed by transfection with SARS2 precursor, was in itself a natural event.
In contrast, by an "engineered" FCS, I mean that 19nt directly came from a DNA synthesizer, mixed with DNA from the SARS2 precursor backbone (cloned into a vector), ligated, all in vitro, and the product transfected into a host cell, the host transcribing the DNA construct, and thus generating a new virus. Since I am an oldster, I am coming from the olden days when they would have used restriction enzymes and the 19nt DNA fragment may have had overhangs (but it could have been via blunt ligation); but I am trying to allow for newfangled direct synthesis methods that I haven't kept up with.
By "natural", it could also mean that the FCS insert was an "accident", maybe not planned. Culturing SARS2 precursor in a cell line containing MSH3 could accelerate mutation rates and thus be good for gain of function research. That engineered MSH3 has a nice FCS sequence in the complimentary strand, and that this compliment fragment got into the SARS2 precursor, may not have been planned.
By "engineered", I imply that some planning was involved. They saw the ArgSer pair defined the FCS site of SARS1 and wanted to "improve it". The "semi-planned" approach involves the creation of "gazillions" of random sequences with a DNA synthesizer, and inserting them near the original FCS site of SARS1. Out of millions one would replicate faster, and we get SARS2. The "fully-planned" approach looks at FCS from all the other coronoviruses, and all the FCS sites from other organisms, in order to define FCS motifs. Hundreds of motif variants are synthesized and tested, and one of them becomes SARS2.
My recollection (correct me if I am wrong) is that the DRASTIC leaks of the proposal showed that they wanted to play with FCS motifs. This sounds like "planning", not "accident". But to me, recombination of a 19nt fragment of the compliment of MHS3 seems more like an accident.
We can rescue the concept of "planning" if the 19nt compliment fragment of MHS3, and the 19nt coding fragment of SARS, both come from an unknown third source. But if it is from a third source, why did Moderna work so hard to choose codons in the coding strand of MHS3 to enable the incorporation of a strong FCS (that "very special FCS") in its compliment? What were they doing? I just don't get it!?!?!?
I have two other comments, one you may like very much, the other probably not so much.
Nice comment. I think any of those are possible, but all of them require lab interference. Much of it beyond that is chicken-and-egg speculation. Direct spicing is possible but you would think they would not then have left overhang traces and just used the 12nt needed... Sometimes you need to overhang for it to work and they had not choice. Alternatively there was cotransfection and they accidentally came up with a novel virus... I think it doesn't matter. The proof is that it didn't come about by nature and the fault lies with them. Eventually someone will sing to save their behind.
Have you looked into the summer of 2019 Greenspring Village & Heatherwood Care home mystery respiratory virus outbreaks? Then Fort Detrick, 1 hr away shuts down suddenly for bs safety reasons. Also a vaping pneumonia started circulating in the US around the same time. I think it leaked from Fort Detrick sometime in 2019. Anyways, China has been calling for an investigation into this. Funny it has been hidden from the public discourse. Evidence is pretty damning. A lot of ppl got sick, some died, CDC couldn't find a cause supposedly. The care home residents were sent a memo but family members weren't notified. Some said their parents with dementia were told but the family wasn't alerted. They found out from the news. Sounds like a coverup to me.
I am really curious about the rash of vaping pneumonias and deaths. DTRA or DOD was known to have been testing vaping as a vehicle for gene therapies. I am deeply suspicious that there were some tests here and there of some unwitting citizens.
I know this is an incredibly dated comment, but I'd say the new endonuclease fingerprint paper shows the human intent behind the construction of the spike, since the FCS can so easily be excised, and even leaves out the conserved Arginine (only put in what you need in relation to the virus you're experimenting with, right? Looks efficient). Exact lab practices I personally know little about still however, but I'd say the "accidental" nature you implied is less likely than purposeful construction
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/a-deep-dive-on-typeiis-restriction
I don't remember us being able to find REs that could splice that exact fragment when looking at that 2+ years ago, which is why the MSH3 paper made more sense. But happy to be proven wrong.
I'm not well versed enough in genetics or lab practices to vet the arguments honestly. But from my inexperienced perspective the endo fingerprint paper seemed sound, as did Mckernan's subsequent takedown of the zoocrew's public "debunking" (which is what the article I provided was). You should read both in that case (if you get the time of course), the restriction enzyme map appears to excise that fragment in a way that again, appears rather efficient to me, and indicates knowledge of other coronaviruses (as the ending R they leave behind is conserved across ronas, pretty sure it's the final R of PRRAR, though again haven't looked in a couple months). I can't remember exactly where the enzyme map sits in relation to the other GP 120 inserts that are clustered in the N terminal domain though. The preprint should also be in the article I posted
This work should be the subject of a real congressional hearing. The data are damn near irrefutable. As a scientist, I am continually astounded that more scientists are not speaking up about this.
Correct. The fact that as a PhD I have to hide behind a murine avatar and pseudonym should tell you all you need to know.
Thank you for your work, hopefully it will inspire others.
That's because scientists, like most people are cowards at heart!
What's your great example of bravery?
One time I hate a pizza pocket without waiting the two minutes for it to cool down.
Hilarious!!!!!!!!
R.F.Kennedy Jr, Tucker Carlson, Truckers in Canada, Peter McCullough, RW Malone, protesters around the globe. It's not like there are none ...
Ultimately scientists need to speak out.
The whole political/WEF/vaccine BS rests on the premise that the science says this is the right thing to do. This shit is comparable to what the nazis did so yes, if scientists do not speak out basically they are facilitating a mass murder. They won't even lose their job, maybe just the BMGF/Welcome Trust funding. Not speaking out while knowing very well that countless people are dying and the gain of function is still being done worldwide is despicable to say the least
There were tons of them on YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIN. Systematically removed when they got warmed up with information circulated.
I infiltrated your movement in WPG. You are not the heroes. Sit down. Be quiet, and drive away. That's an order!
Those people are infiltrating, no actually awakening, more and more minds. This is the ultimate objective.
When was the last time when you told your boss to go f... him/her/it/pangolin-self?
I didn't think so :P!
When they do, they are gone off social media.
Nice work! Even as a non-expert, I was able to follow the logic.
I also note the patent is dated February 2018. Interesting...
I don't want to ask for speculation beyond what you feel is reasonable based on the evidence, but this leads to some very big questions. There were suggestions early on that the HIV inserts could be indicative of target epitopes for developing prototype HIV vaccine (I think Montaignier mentioned this.) However, why would they then make the whole chimeric virus much more dangerous with the insertion of the furin cleavage site if they were just making target practice virus for testing vaccine concepts? Why not use an animal adapted spike with your HIV epitopes so the whole experiment is FAR less dangerous?
What I'm getting at: is there still a plausible and somewhat benign explanation for why they might graft these characteristics together? The more manipulations are discovered, the more it looks to me like the goal was a virulent human infectious chimeric virus with the added advantage of 'plug-and-play' spike protein that could be swapped out to target different cell receptors or target populations; i.e. the holy-grail of modern bioweapon.
So is there still some legitimate purpose excuse available? Could this have been HIV vaccine research or some sort of cancer vaccine research? Could it have been the DEFUSE 'bat vaccine?'
EDIT: Put simply: the explanation that they were just looking for the next human pandemic potential bat virus falls apart when their chimeric virus had THIS MANY manipulations. So what were they attempting?
If I am answering the right question I'll say this. The intention was to create a bioweapon that would not kill off the future slave population (young people) which is why it needed to be SARS based. They knew they had an antidote in HCQ so they were safe. The purpose is a one-world economy (aka great reset aka agenda 2030) which is global fascism. This is not conspiracy theory - this is what the WEF have said they are aiming for, it's just that it's so obviously fascist socialism that people are told not to believe it and they don't because they are in a mass psychosis. It's how the elites (aka oligarchy aka cabal aka WEF aka CFR) have always run things when they can get away with it. So they take a SARS virus, put in (by intention or accident) a FCS for which they have an antidote (folate, HCQ) and HIV epitopes to help evade the immune system (SARS was too immunogenic so died off quickly) and then imposed public health restrictions that ensured the spread of the virus was prolonged artificially. That provided the fear factor so they could get their digital passport system in. It's working well tbh
Thank you. I feel like there it is now nearly impossible to contrive a believable explanation for the experiments that created SARS-COV-2 other than something very dark like what you say.
This hypothesis is gaining significant traction. What I need clarification about is who gains and in what way when the world population is so drastically altered? The indiscriminate killing of intelligent and well educated people who can potentially advance humanity to the next level appears to me a nihilistic endeavour. If I wanted to improve the situation this planet finds itself in, I would do my utmost to save the truly productive at the expense of the rest. Simply wanting to have slaves cater for my needs is not adequate. I would require stimulus. Artists, musicians, scientists and on a more basic level, dentists to ensure I do not expire prematurely from a banal tooth abscess. So then, just what do these people hope to achieve? Or are they, inexplicably, just egocentric morons?
There is a reason for all this insanity - not a reason such as normal people have in mind - but the rollout for this depravity is within ten years. There is little time left, if we do not stop it in the year 22, it will not be stoppable anymore.
I suppose if there is an understandable aim to it all, it is simply to reduce the human population to what is considered a reasonable level. But the methods are crude in the extreme and do not appeal to my sense of elegance.
Hubris. They thing that they have stored knowledge in AI and databases and don't need the skilled master class of people to teach or practice the knowledge.
Interesting that you comment on this aspect. It's gaining traction since in the UK the average age of Covid victims is 80 yrs old.
In Canada, it is 82. I think they overshot the average age mark imo. I think if they wanted to kill off conservatives and leave only super-liberal types, they should have aimed for an average kill age of 60 with a 50% mortality rate at that age bracket. Leaving a lot of children, teens, many under 40s and some 50s to 60s to educate the next-generation/pass along their skills.
Actually the figure was I think, 82 years old. Pretty much all of them had other problems too. Unfortunately if you want to kill off a couple of billion people, being specific would give the game away. An ideal situation would be eliminating the weak, disabled and the old. A work force of fit young people is necessary to ensure your version after this carnage of a 'civilised society" is maintained, the challenge then is to stabilise the population at the level you deem is required, yet maintaining the lifestyle you so richly deserve. The planning so far has been a shambles. If the population is decimated, there is no need to attempt a carbon-free future. No need to waste billions on futile power generation from wind turbines and Chinese solar panels. In fact , looking at the aims objectively, it is as usual ill planned, illogical and rather ridiculous.
See, that once again, doesn't make sense to me. Throughout the entire pandemic, worldwide, I think covid has killed less than like 10 mil people. 8 mil compared to 7 billion is a drop in the bucket. Its like 0.1%? If they are planning to drop the population to 500 million, they need about an 92% reduction. So making 0.1% progress there is literately, a single drop in a glass.
I have not seen the first wave lethality as any more than required to get the digital passports up & running.
Once totalitarian tyranny is in place, the enslaved will do what they’re told or starve. It’s at this stage that depopulation proper can begin.
Thoughts on the ideal population numbers are nothing new. It has been discussed for the past 100 years and plans formulated to enact it. We have seen a couple of efforts put into it-a couple of world wars, swine flu, but wars are too destructive and disease could not be successfully tried until the understanding of how viruses work and how to counter them came along. Now the conceit that we understand microbes well has put this plan into action. There is more than one aim to it all. The world banks will be amalgamated and the people introduced to the joy of social credit. The drug companies are seeking a maximum profit to go into the brave new world. That is the weakness, not all want the same thing, But this is a long haul attack. If you can kill off a few million over the next 10 years or so, destroy the immune system of the rest, they become your slaves for the rest of their lives. It is quite perfect if the imagination and hubris is there to do such a thing. All of the main payers are paid off in some way. No interest at all from the international media for example. Listening to these talking heads, it's astounding just how brainless they are and the instigators for the large part are psychopaths and have no empathy. I have no idea what the figure to aim for is, it might be a billion....l guess l shall have to ask Bill Gates.
Just been reading through these older posts. The fact that these jabs are being pushed for very young children suggests that no part of the population is to be spared. Get rid of European populations who use far more energy than Africa and you have a breathing space to reorganise 'civilisation.' There does appear to be at least two factions at work pushing different agendas. One is merely after a great deal of money ( just what they intend to spend it on after everything has crashed is beyond me) the other is philosophical but no less dangerous. The infatuation with new technology, computer models for everything and a touching faith in their understanding of what they are doing will be their downfall.
Bingo. That is why they are going after the Western countries and wanting to eliminate that standard of living. Destroying energy infrastructure, farms.
In light of this, what do you think of Omicron? Did it evolve naturally or was it yet another engineered and controlled release?
The effect of Omicron seems to be the opposite of what the elites were pushing for the last two years - constant fear and the narrative that the only salvation is getting vaccinated. Omicron seems to be milder, at least in the short run, so people are not so afraid of it. The vaccines are totally worthless with Omicron, which undermines the push for mandating them and controlling the mandates with vaxx passports.
Technically the arguments (too few synonymous mutations) seem to be in favour of another la-bat-ory event but what is the motivation for it?
Viruses change through time and these changes cannot be predictable. Omicron is one of those changes that can be predicted to a degree. It is pointless killing your host. Being mild enables your host to continue living and you the virus thrive. Ultimately, becoming part of your host's DNA is the dream of all dreams.
Omi actually predates the original Wuhan strain... Figure that one out.
When one constructs dozens of viruses to introduce into polite society, if distracted and the pin falls out of the naming board it's easy to re-install the pin out of sequence. It won't happen again.
Quasispecies mutant swarm.
I know this rings true, but always bracing to see it stated so starkly in writing. It was clear to me right away that flattening the curve meant prolonging the event and delaying natural herd immunity.
Also, if the cleavage site sequence came from oncology research and is from "MSH3_mutated cell lines designed for developing cancer vaccines," then what to make of this?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8538446/
"SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro"
That paper is damning, which I suspect is why they are trying to get it taken offline. However it doesn't relate to the original genomics of the virus. It is about the effect of the spike protein
I'm no microbiologist, but my reaction after reading that paper is "the DNA damage repair being broken by spike protein is similar to radiation sickness...people die from the inside out!"
Dr. Can I ask you an off-topic question? Do the PCR tests (of which there are many) find DNA/RNA that is exclusive to SARS COV 2, or is the DNA/RNA sequence that binds to the PCR test also present in other viruses? Also I was told that some PCR tests look for a sequence that is part of the Spike protein. Does this mean that they could accidently test positive for the spike produced by the vaccine, rather than the spike produced by the virus? Thanks for any light you can shed on these issues.
In general they should be specific for that virus. Most of them have test result included for cross-reactivity to other similar viruses. Some of the labs were only testing for S-gene but more reliable tests are for 3-genes (e.g. S, E, N). With omicron the S-gene test fails
I develop these PCR tests, primarily ones that are multiplexed to be able detect and differentiate Sars-CoV-2, flu A, flu B, and RSV all at same time. Easily distinguishable, and you would not be able to detect spike mRNA from vaccine in nose cells, besides the nucleocapsid is also tested.
The PCR test was never meant to 'detect' - it is solely intended to AMPLIFY existing strings of nucleotides. Why a pcr test is being 'developed' and, moreover, used to 'test' for the presence of a computer-model 'virus' is beyond me. And corroborates the mindboggling deception around the entire 'covid' scam.
Do you believe the spike protein enters the nucleus and inhibits DNA repair?
Dear Dr Ah Kahn Syed - first a compliment and note for fellow laymen, then a question.
Thank you for the clearest presentation yet regarding the lab origin of the virus with reference to the genetic code. As a layman, I had great difficulty understanding this line of argument in the past when it first arose, but with your screenshots I was able to follow along with the BLAST repository and verify the identical sequences by myself. It's unlikely we'd see this kind of analysis in any accessible media so it's to your credit that there is a logical explanation of what's involved. For those who are having trouble with the "CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG" part (the final search referenced in this article), use this tool to produce the reverse complement: https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/rev_comp.html It gives "CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG". Then when you search one of the Moderna patents from 2015 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/HZ246785.1 , go down to the "2761" area and you will see the exact sequence with the first letter starting at the end of the previous line. (If I'm wrong here, please correct).
Second, I understand how this would mean that this virus's origin would be a non-random event, and that this would mean it is man-made.
If you are willing to speculate though, or able to clarify, what does this suggest about the relation between Moderna and the lab?
You write "In order for that sequence to have arisen in that virus" it "had to have had been infected into patented cell lines supplied by Moderna that had that unique sequence not seen in any other virus."
Is it only the case that the patent cell lines could have been supplied by Moderna?
Or is it possible that the lab researchers read Moderna's patent and devised to copy that component by themselves? Or is this possible but a much less likely explanation?
I've never done lab work so I don't know if that's possible or feasible.
Also, I was reading one of the patent descriptions for the updated in 2020 version of "Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides." (search "US20200247861" on the WIPO patentscope https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US300737301&_cid=P22-KYEYCO-79030-1 )
In the patent description is the following:
>"As described herein, a useful feature of the oncology-related polynucleotides, primary constructs or mmRNA of the invention is the capacity to reduce, evade or avoid the innate immune response of a cell."
>"While in some circumstances, it might be advantageous to eliminate the innate immune response in a cell, the invention provides polynucleotides, primary constructs and mmRNA that upon administration result in a substantially reduced (significantly less) the immune response, including interferon signaling, without entirely eliminating such a response."
>"Provided herein, in part, are oncology-related polynucleotides, oncology-related primary constructs and/or oncology-related mmRNA encoding oncology-related polypeptides of interest which have been designed to improve one or more of the stability and/or clearance in tissues, receptor uptake and/or kinetics, cellular access by the compositions, engagement with translational machinery, mRNA half-life, translation efficiency, immune evasion, protein production capacity, secretion efficiency (when applicable), accessibility to circulation, protein half-life and/or modulation of a cell's status, function and/or activity."
Therefore, regarding the particular sequence in the virus, which is identical to the one in the patent, does this mean the addition of the sequence would be to enhance the immune system evasion of the virus? Or that it was added as part of the virus to help prevent the body from breaking it down?
Not sure if you can speculate from the patent and sequence like that, but it would help contextualize things.
Thank you very much and I hope you can help enlighten me and the other laymen readers who may have similar questions.
Dear John, thank you for this excellent and informative comment and question! The reverse complement tool link is really useful for those who are scratching their heads.
In regards to how it arrived there, this would just be speculation. The problem is that Moderna are the most suspicious company in existence. They never produced a viable drug yet have thousands of patents for mutated human genes. From a bioethics standpoint they should have been shut down years ago. They have never contributed to a single saved life and now it seems they have contributed to mass death only (and that includes the net effect of the mRNA spike protein "vaccine" looking at Norman Fenton and Martin Neil's excellent data analysis). So the assumption has to be that they have provided the relevant cell lines to the Wuhan lab.
I was in the field (raising equity financing for a biotech) around the same time Moderna was doing the same. I was as sure as I could be that they were fraudulent. Similarly with Elizabeth Holmes’ Theranos, Bancel prompted in me an immediate assessment as a liar.
Bancel doesn’t have the right background & expertise to front a cutting edge biotech like this. I know enough about mRNA as a tool to know it isn’t sufficiently controllable to make it as a medical intervention in the same way a small molecule drug might. Not now & not ever.
As an old school drug discovery person, I knew that the whole approach lacks the means of controlling outcome after injection. Unavoidably variable results including lots of effects we couldn’t anticipate.
So the entire concept was fraudulent. At least, it is unless you don’t mind unsafe interventions.
Several venture fund partners I pitched to had money in Moderna. One I got to know well enough to ask went quiet when I challenged on the fundamental technology. My gathering sense was there was way too much money going into Moderna (& companies with related technologies) to make economic sense.
Wy do l get the impression that l am listening at a keyhole. There is so much information available if one cares to look for it. I visited a supermarket this morning and chatted to a few staff members. They all agree our facial fashion statements were BS but couldn't enunciate why. It's fascinating that even the most basic education can still produce a vague understanding that all is not well. One customer even went one better than us conformists, she had glittery things sewn onto her mask. Obviously she plans on wearing it forever.
I found these articles quite a while ago. Eye opening, to say the least!
Ego, ambition, and turmoil: Inside one of biotech’s most secretive startups
https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
Thank you for the reply! Yes the sudden rise of Moderna relative to their lackluster business prior to covid is also a strange element of this lab leak constellation.
Also, your article is generating a lot more discussion.
It was posted on Hacker News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29938732 However it seems like only one user there "dnautics" actually understands your argument.
It was also posted several times on Reddit today. Please do not be disheartened by its location in the 'conspiracy' subreddit. Unfortunately anything contrary to the establishment narrative is only able to be shared in that subreddit because the Reddit moderators are overzealous in banning anyone who questions the vaccine's merits/virus origin/lockdowns' validity.
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/s43pi5/a_sars_virus_emerging_naturally_with_3_hiv/
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/s3v8wl/moderna_patented_nucleotide_sequence_found_in_the/
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/s41ldo/ctcctcggcgggcacgtag_the_smoking_gun/
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/s3qn63/sarscov2_is_manmade_the_specific_19_nucleotide/
That last one has someone (PseudoDave) trying to 'debunk' your article but I don't think he addresses any of the core claims. That is, not addressing the search of the sequence in the *viruses* specifically, not addressing the exact 19n match, and appeals to ignorance about what BLAST may or may not contain from nature.
Anyway, perhaps if you have some time later, maybe you can write an expansion of this article, taking down the common but uninformed attacks. I would be extremely interested in any follow up as I imagine the knee-jerk criticisms being slung are of the 'fact-check' variety - that is, dismissive smears that don't deal with the main points at all. As I believe that if the virus was man made (extremely likely) then this has enormous implications for the last two years, and proves an inescapable guilt for those in power performing heinous acts on the populace, and this origin explanation is something that should be solidified logically for everyone who is demanding justice and answers.
Yes I might do this in a few days. You might want to look at my response to "SK" above.
Thank you, I would be very interested to read it. I read your response to "SK". It seems like there is a usual strawman against the lab origin/sequence match argument that he and others use. These strawmen arguments against you are not compelling given that they doesn't address the points you make but I hope your next elucidations of the thesis can further dispel the uninformed criticisms.
There is a paper that has been submitted - not by my group but another - that hopefully will find its way out eventually.
Can you provide any further details? There are so few sources you can trust I like to stick to the ones I know are not hiding anything!
Awesome, please keep us updated!
If you can BLAST your way to the truth lets see your paper published by the BMJ after a peer review or are you going to hide behind a name which is a forgery? How do we know you are a PhD?
It has been decades since I worked in a lab, but I did look in occasionally, usually to a diagnostic lab.
Recall that CDC initially (early 2020) provided incorrect probes for spike protein antigens ( I had an article from S Korea.) Recall that synthesising a string of nucleotides is relatively accessible, these are, after all , the probes for the PCR tests.
Combine that with CRISPR techniques and you should be able to construct what you need.
Knowing what you need 2 years before the event might be construed as cheating, in sailboat racing we describe this as "Over Early", now penalised as OCS.
In the innocent days, years before all of this nonsense, several of us took my yacht out onto the Waitamata in Auckland New Zealand on Wednesday nights for pizza and rum and cokes. The racing fraternity would scrape under our ponderous progress with shouts of "Starboard" to which I would shout back "Steel!" It didn't take them too many Wednesdays to tender some respect. Weight is power!
Ah Kahn you said "So the assumption has to be that they (Moderna) have provided the relevant cell lines to the Wuhan lab."
Science is not based on assumption. Its based on verifying facts. The burden of proof is on he who accuses. Show us the proof.
Nope. If you can't see it I can't help you.
"Science is not based on assumption." That is precisely why Dr Ah Kahn Syed clearly stated he was making an assumption. I'm sure he was hoping that by stating it so clearly, no readers would leap to the idea that he was promulgating a fact, which would therefore require one or more verifying citation. Evidently, he was wrong in that hope.
So this is your conclusion for the article which shows evidence and proof for every step in the process? You don't have to agree with it. What would be less disingenuous is if you offered alternative explanations for the above findings. Otherwise you're just a troll
I apologize, Dr Ah Khan Syed, if I was unclear in expressing myself. The "fact" I was referring to related to Moderna having "provided the relevant cell lines to the Wuhan lab." If we had a video of a FedEX driver dropping off a package at the Wuhan lab, and zooming in on the package we could see it labeled as "19 Nucleotide sequence for creating a furin cleavage site" and FROM: Moderna ...we would have an actual, provable "fact" rather than a supposition.
What you provided us with was the equivalent of: "Mr. Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, having broken down the locked library door, discovered the butler standing over the lifeless body of Lord Cuthbert, still stabbing him with the Corinthian dagger the butler was known always to carry upon his person." Thus, the "assumption" that the butler did it being true is as near to a "fact" as one could get, absent a video of the actual moment Lord Cuthbert expired. And in the case of the Moderna sequences, your assumption is borne out by the staggering mathematics of sheer chance having resulted in the inclusion.
And to compound this unlikelihood, imagine this news announcement: "Researchers looking into SARScov2 using BLAST have discovered that a 19 character long sequence therein exactly matches with a section of a patented gene. The patent was filed by a small research group looking to develop a soybean better adapted to climate change. What are the odds?!"
What are the odds that the patent was filed by a company that—according to them—came up with a vaccine against SARScov2 in a matter of two days?
What's even more surprising about all of this to me is, continuing the metaphor, that the butler never got arrested.
I'm somewhat lost in your analogies but appreciate your time. Moderna claimed the sequence (MSH3_mut) in their submission to the Genbank patent database. Now, they either supplied the cell line knowingly, unknowingly, or the sequence was used without their permission in a locally made cell line despite Moderna registering that gene in the genbank patent database.
The original intention could have been to develop a vaccine that could target the nucleocapsid and the RNA material within. You will note that most corona viruses, including the 'common flu', have a very similar nucleocapsid composition and can be attacked by T Cells (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00367-7) and from there the immune cascade with the T Cells developing a long term response i.e., if the idea worked then you could have a 'cure to the common cold' or certainly a better flu vaccine. What is interesting at this point are a couple of observations: people who have had the flu (as part of their medical history) are more resistant to Covid... thus supporting the stated assertion. One wonders why no vaccines have been produced that target the nucleocapsid? Patent issues I suspect.
It should be noted that targeting the nucleocapsid and a variety of other strategic points e.g., moieties on the viral envelope and well as the spike protein is one of the reasons why natural immunity is stronger than a vaccine (more points of differentiation) - and there is no money in everyone realising that natural herd immunity is the way forward... however, this idea provides ample explanation as to why the 'unvaxxed' get persecuted - they are standing in the way of profit.
One other interesting observation about influenza (which is also manufactured) is that the 2009 influenza produced a super immunity. Anybody that had that "swine flu" is super immune to flu viruses. It seems they have been down this pathway before, and it worked, but that then kills off their finance stream for flu vaccines (which Cochrane says are useless)
Indeed, one of the clues for me, a former “normie” was realising per Cochrane that ‘flu vaccination, at a population level, has no benefit (except to the vaccine makers & anyone else paid off along the way).
I remember feeling unmoored. Really peculiar. Because this meant every institution involved in the process new that they didn’t work. Probably not the individual doctors, but nobody cared about that. Doctors are no longer regarded as skilled.
I wish I’d not just ignored that peculiar feeling.
I thank you for your informative article. Only those who accept coincidences without realising it’s just not possible to do so think the virus sequence is natural.
One question. Is there really a novel coronavirus moving through the population?
Just because there’s such a sequence lodged doesn’t automatically mean it’s at large across the world.
A friend in the former eastern bloc, who works in public health, designing PCR tests, is firm in their view that there’s been more than one apparent release.
The logic is that the three waves in their country are impossible to have descended one from the other. The last wave, sequenced using NGS, apparently back tracked to an earlier form, lost several mutations, then gained some new ones!
I question whether there really is a new respiratory virus because there are already scores of them that we’re not looking for (in people with symptoms). It’s no big deal though. The most outrageous discoveries don’t raise eyebrows these days. That’s one of the things I find most surprising. How has almost every journalist & almost every doctor & scientist chosen to look at their shoes for two years? Money? Fear?
They found reliable cross reactivity for Sars-Cov-2 as well in that cohort yeah?
Now I want to get swine flu haha. Living in Australia unvaxed is pretty ordinary these days.
Thank you for bringing this up, dear Dr Ah Kahn Syed! I recall a paper quite a while back that I believe explained that there was a sequence in common with H1N1 of 2008 and that those infected at the time enjoyed immunity from early SARS-CoV-2. I had begun to believe I imagined that connection (old phone with poor screenshot capacity, alas). You are a truly gifted pedagogue. Sending you very best wishes and wishing you all good things.
can I send you some additional information? Send me a contact email address that you are comfortable with...
gab.com/arkmedic is probably the safest. Chat is encrypted. I'll be busy this week though
I've been reading these comments again and thought that Novavax was heading in the right direction. Their vaccine was a traditional system but l've heard nothing about it for a while. Do you know if it is being offered? Side effects and efficacy?
Same toxicity as the other jabs, injecting yourself with spike protein. But maybe less long-term toxicity since no mrna factory injected. Completely unnecessary since vit C megadosing cures pretty much every pathogenic illness aside from some parasitic ones.
This was supposed to be safer since l understood it to be a traditional vax rather than a spike protein based jab. l shall continue to wait until the required 5 years or so of tests are completed, having more faith in vitamin C and D than an arm that looks like a pin cushion.
Spot on. All of the vaccines to date have used the virus aimed at in its entirety in order to allow the immune system to 'inspect' the mRNA and its capsule. Some vaccines like smallpox proved quite dangerous as l can testify. But this pales into insignificance when a novel approach is possible and everyone falls in love with it.
The spike protein was reverse engineered by the University of North Carolina for the Wuhan lab to study human-mouse hybrids: infectivity and immune response. The head of the Wuhan Lab and also head of the Chinese CDC is Mr GAO. He has 25 patents, all biotech related, and is an expert in both bat virology and infectious diseases... and I am guessing Mr GAO, with the right incentives (money and influence) is someone not worried about doing research that would be illegal in the US --- but OK in China and possibly of utility to the CCP - of which he is a senior member). His bio is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._Gao
and he got funding from Fauci to do it...
Fauci won't give money you idiot. It is NIH that funds research
Umm. Maybe you would like to look at Fauci's request to DARPA for bat coronavirus research in Wuhan leaked by project Veritas.
The exact range research was eventually performed Fauci's your friend and ceo of EcoHealth went on to do... In Wuhan with a grant Fauci allegedly pushed through. At the same time as an infectious disease, filled with the same genetics as US parents, appeared in Wuhan with no intermediate carriers or animals in between Wuhan and the cage 3000km away where the bats with the pre gain of function research resided.
It does appear that this was the case since this kind of experimentation was outlawed in the US. There are now strong suggestions that experimental labs were also set up in Ukraine doing similar work for the US. As they say... the thlot plickens....
Have you seen who he is friends with?
You'll have to be mor specific... but if you are referring to Anthony Pauci then the answer is yes (though more acquaintances than friends)...
He went to university and is good pals with Sir Jeremy Farrar. Gao was also involved in event 201 which was funded by Bill and Melinda Foundation as well as WEF.
You are correct and I have documented Event 201 and the people there but have never succeeded in getting it published (been trying since Jan 2020)
Publish it on substack?
Thank you for breaking this down so clearly, and keeping the pressure on. When this madness ends it will be thanks to efforts like yours that break the camel's back.
Excellent thread. Thank you for your courage and taking the time to report on this!
This is important work. How can I reach you by email?
Gab.com/arkmedic chat or t.me/arkmedic and we can take it from there. I've been looking for you
Thank you for an essay relatively accessible to the layman. I have a good general education, but specialization in computer science. As such I am familiar with data sequences and degrees of probability. Your and earlier work showing the "fingerprints" of likely manipulation lend just more evidence to the claim that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab.
For the record, much other circumstantial evidence exists. Two of the biggest (to me) were the very odd behaviors of the Chinese in early 2020 once news of the virus broke. Scrubbed databases, threats to medical workers and (reportedly) disappeared personnel as well as lack of cooperation for outside investigations alone make them look guilty. Add to this NIH's (NIAID, etc.) very odd behavior ca. Feb. 2020 as documented in the mid-2021 FOIA-ed emails of Fauci et al. Allowing for some inferences due to incomplete information, he and others went to extraordinary lengths to dissuade anyone from raising the chance of a lab accident, culminating in the Lancet article soon after.
You would have to live in a cabbage patch to believe this virus did NOT come from a lab. Surely investigations such as your could be replicated. I don't know if they could meet the rigors of scientific proof, but someone deserves a Nobel or at least a Pulitzer for reporting and documenting this story. Even if such a report were accomplished, however, I am skeptical whether thoroughly corrupt institutions would ever concede the truth.
My thoughts exactly regarding a Nobel or Pulitzer for this incredible work. It’s phenomenal on so many levels.
The best explanation I've seen anywhere. Sounds perfectly plausible. Very well presented. Will be sharing far and wide.
Wow. Stunning stuff, and clear enough for a layperson to follow. The lack of curiosity in the mainstream is still baffling, particularly in light of the (email)exposure of Fauci's conspiracy to discredit the lab leak hypothesis and push the pangolin-bat party fantasy.
Any truth to the idea of a snake neurotoxin insert on S1 also? I'm sure there was something written about a prion, too.
The Spike that keeps giving!
Makes you wonder what Moderna has cooking with its (more)experimental slew of MRNA shots https://www.modernatx.com/pipeline.
The "lack of curiosity" is fueled by the ginormous financial stranglehold Big Pharma has on the mainstream media and on politicians. The late '90's law that allowed direct to consumer advertising by drug companies has made a huge difference, though not the only factor.
This is beyond GoF. This is a molecular WMD. The former implies recklessness, the latter premeditation. #molecularWMD would be a surefire way to nuke your Twitter account.
"Safe and Effective" is the modern "Weapons of Mass Destruction" -- both lies used as a pretense to begin wars against global freedom.
Noice! I quoted you on my Gab account, fren.
Excellent article. Glad to see you still fighting. We need to catch up, as soon as possible - I've got some notes to swap related to this.
chrixey@protonmail.com
Thanks for your work!! Just subscribed.
would love to see some of those notes
Amazing this didn't take off as soon as you posted.
One way to square the circle between this and the Baric and Shi work going back decades - Moderna had access to the code in 2017 as part of collusion with the protein's original designers. They might not have even been aware of the significance with the virus when it emerged and when they were tapped to produce the transfections, or they were more like a novice tagging along in a bank heist at any rate. They needed money, did what they were told.
Are the HIV epitopes immune camouflage, or T Cell infiltration machines, or just would-be HIV vaccine designs slapped onto a coronavirus in 2001 that were found to have interesting pathology during the SARS release? Perhaps they were just designed to spook people out, so that the closer society got to the truth, the more we would become afraid and latch onto another promised vaccine exit. Germaphobia dies hard. Look at Cottrell - serious Howard Hughes vibes.
HIV epitopes are immune camouflage IMHO. The question is which came first? I think they had already developed a HIV-studded coronavirus and they just needed to get something in there that would enable an antidote. Then it became a bioweapon.
B"H" Thank you. This much-needed information, as well as details on the Moderna patents, has been sent to members of the Japanese Diet (Parliament). Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock a .de .dk poet, 18c wrote "Yet History will rise in her due time and speak her piece. And after she has spoken, all preceding claptrap will be of no more consequence."
And as I said: It is in the merit of the Righteous women we will all be redeemed.
Hi Dan!