168 Comments

Great article! The 'PANDATA' crew have become increasingly hostile and obnoxious in their rhetoric; one tried to insist there was no way for a virus to transfer from 'humanized mice' to humans. The mechanism is literally in the name of the type of genetically modified mouse.

It isn't possible to refer to evidence given such evidently partisan hostilities (The Daily Beagle compiled numerous examples of vaccine research labs causing outbreaks: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/vaccine-manufacturers-are-behind).

If the gain-of-function (GoF) research didn't exist, why did Ralph Baric have to fight with the White House to get the 'pause' on GoF overturned? Answer: Ralph Baric was engaging in gain-of-function.

"He [Ralph Baric] recalls that when he came back to work that Monday, he opened his email and was stunned to learn about the moratorium. He thought of all his lab's research projects. "It took me 10 seconds to realize that most of them were going to be affected," he says."

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/11/07/361219361/how-a-tilt-toward-safety-stopped-a-scientists-virus-research

If GoF doesn't exist, what was the White House trying to ban?

If GoF doesn't exist and Ralph Baric wasn't doing it, why was Ralph Baric trying to overturn the law?

If GoF doesn't exist, why was Baric serializing SARS-WIV-1 through humanized mice, and not just using normal mice? Why was he trying to put a human virus into humanized mice if the virus wasn't intended for humans?

If GoF doesn't exist, why are so many countries trying to establish as many BSL-2, 3 and 4 labs as possible? Why was China trying to build a lab if it wasn't engaging in GoF research?

The evidence gain-of-function research is occurring is overwhelming. The sad part is they're still doing it.

Here's a real play: if PANDA think GoF does not exist, then call their bluff and have them endorse legislation banning it. As it supposedly doesn't exist they're not going to run afoul of the law and should have zero objections to it being outright banned.

Expand full comment

"If GoF doesn't exist, what was the White House trying to ban?"

Grifting and money laundering perhaps ?? lol

Expand full comment
Feb 18·edited Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

So yes, this all seems rather definitive. I trusted and admired PANDA and Nick Hudson during the Covid debacle. Then when they suddenly pivoted to this 'GOF doesn't exist' narrative, which itself provided a hobby horse for the irritating 'viruses don't exist' crowd to jump aboard, I became bemused. I challenged Nick online but he seemed curiously reluctant to engage directly with the facts, so I then began to suspect that he might be the victim of an ideological obsession. The question which now arises is: did this ideological obsession result in Nick Hudson interviewing Norman Piezianek, simply as an exercise in reinforcing that ideology or was the motivation for interviewing Piezianek rather darker? Was it in fact, as hinted here, a case of Nick/PANDA knowingly assisting an attempt by an establishment bioweapons researcher to divert attention away from the nefarious and illegal activities of the bioweapons industry by inviting discord and division in the 'medical freedom community'? These are uncomfortable questions, but they must be answered, and more importantly they must be answered in a manner which does not invite more discord, disharmony and division and does not invite hordes of radical dissenters on either side hysterically screaming abuse at one another and accusing one another of being controlled opposition. Because that's a win-win situation for the powers that be. They first seed narrative confusion, which seeds division, then when their motives and methods become clearer, and the accusations start flying about who said what and why, they sit back and watch further vicious infighting, among those who are tempted to 'take sides' without calmly assessing the facts and the evidence beforehand. We can't let this happen. The stakes are too high.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. I think you have expressed my intention better than I could!

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I guess all the "Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defence" work I did in the services was just to burn up time because those things never existed.

Expand full comment

I took CBRN training twice in the early 90s, they were really keen on it then. Things that make you go hmm.

Expand full comment

"RN"? Radiation and Nuclear considered separate aspects?

Expand full comment

Yea but the threat was real enough, its not like they trained those animals to go into convulsions for the training films back in the day. Yea CBRN is the same as NBCD, interesting how the Americans never had Biological but I believe they considered it part of chemical warfare as the delivery agents were powder and fluid in those times.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

The toxins weren't the only cause of "Gulf War Syndrome." The husband of a dear friend, who was in the military at the time but who was not deployed to the gulf, suffered terrible symptoms similar to those who were deployed. Those symptoms (chronic fatigue, loss of muscle control among others) were the result of the military forcing the experimental anthrax vaccine on all personnel. He was a pilot and had to give up flying. Because he was so close to his 20 year mark they allowed him to remain in until he reached that milestone then forced him to retire. He is better today than he was, but still suffers from some ill effects. I believe that anthrax releases (remember when envelopes with suspicious substances showed up in the offices of Congress?) were done deliberately so that the military/intelligence agencies could run the experimental vaccine program. Sound familiar?

Expand full comment

The anthrax vaccine that was forced upon service members, most having no idea it was experimental is a most likely source of the GWS.

Expand full comment

Prof Nicholson proved that these anthrax vaccines were full of weaponized mycoplasma. On top of the fact that generally anthrax vaccines are generally infamous for their AEs

Expand full comment

How did the Iraqis supposedly promulgate mycoplasmata? Straightforward in injections.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

It really is a minefield trying to negotiate a path through all the contradictory information available to us. I watched two of the interviews with Jessica Hockett and Nick Hudson with Norman Pieniazek and he very quickly dismissed gain of function and biological weapons being used. He has a very interesting history as Dr Ah Khan Syed has pointed out and appears to argue a lot on twitter about these very subjects and I must say sometimes accusing people he disagrees with of being Russian agents or being paid by Pfizer. At first I was very suspicious of him then because of his attaching and inserting himself into podcasts that I listen to this became blurred, but what cannot be ignored is how involved he was in the very subjects he is quick to dismiss. Thank you for this very interesting and informative article.

Expand full comment
author

According to Norman, everybody who doesn't agree with him is a Pfizer shill. Even those that have criticised Pfizer, Moderna and the mRNA platform for vaccine use.

Expand full comment
Feb 19·edited Feb 19

Kind of reminds me of Russia/Ukraine. All anyone has to do is state the obvious, Ukraine is getting it's ass waxed and they all come out reeeeing about Paid Shill, Bot, Troll, Putin Puppet and the rest of what they accuse are much worse. It's not just in the medical arena that this is happening. Even the alt media arena and even the wacky Q cats are all at each others throats. and the Paytriot set is joining the fray and blasting others for what they have already been doing for several years, selling their merch and getting paid. So Why Now ?? All of them are getting played !!! And all of them are falling for it.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I’ve been following hockett since tge beginning and have been concerned with her posts lately. When she started telling people not to believe their own eyes and ears, you just thought you were sick differently but you weren’t. My latest crazy theory is that war games were being played but some knew they won’t games and some were allowed to try and figure out.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I agree with this, in late March 2020 I developed an infection that I had never experienced before. I had profound bone crushing exhaustion and difficulty in taking a deep breath, I had no knowledge of GoF but it felt out of the ordinary. I decided to try and wait it out, it was a good decision, after a few days the symptoms lessened very gradually and after a couple of months I returned to my usual self. There was something that occurred early in 2020 and it was not produced by nature.

Expand full comment

I was sick in November 2019 in a way I have never been sick before. My body was racked in pain and for the first time in my life I thought about going to tge hospital. I’m glad this was before tge hysteria as I imagine that would have freaked me out. I also used to not believe in long covid but now I’m not sure. Glad you listened to yrself and didn’t go to tge hospital!

Expand full comment

Respectfully, I was sick for two weeks straight 42 years ago, when I was 9. Lingered for nearly a month after that.

I’m sure if that occurred during the time of the pandemic I would have most certainly been convinced that I had Covid.

Sadly at this point, we cannot rule out targeted, intentional poisoning of the population to create the illusion of a devastating virus infecting us

Expand full comment

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell, 1984

Expand full comment
Feb 18·edited Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

First, they terrorize the world with a declared pandemic and then they claim there was no virus. They are masochists in the extreme, do love to torture and confuse. What has occurred is violent and abusive in the extreme to the nth degree. expect truth will eventually prevail.

Expand full comment

>expect truth will eventually prevail.

What if it doesn't?

Expand full comment

truth is like water, it finds its level

Expand full comment

Unless it's frozen

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

wouldn't that make them sadists and not masochists then?

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

you are correct, wrong word in hasty response; hope my impression is understood

Expand full comment

Wouldn't it make them Both ?? I guess if they are causing their own pain and seeming to enjoy it. lol

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Excellent read, well done!

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Love your stream!! Give Rixey my best, I hope he gets better.

Expand full comment

He can read another 14,000 pdf's while he recuperates. Then maybe find some more anonymous foreign twitter users to send copies of secret US government documents to.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Thank you for this excellent presentation. I have watched the McCairn, Rixey, Ikky show and would recommend as many people as possible to watch.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I am watching it now and have just taken a short break, I am impressed this time in their professional presentation style and their cogent reasoning behind gain of function. So I thank Dr Ah Khan Syed for including it in the article.

Expand full comment
Feb 19Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

It’s weird, all of a sudden viruses don’t even exist and you’re a complete dolt for believing in them, therefore you’re wrong about everything and cannot be trusted. Then gain of function research isn’t real even though there is decades of literature and dozens of books with detailed footnotes and references along with a multi billion dollar industry that has penetrated all aspects of society, growing cartoonishly in size since 9/11 and the anthrax attacks. But we are idiots for reading. As a rule of thumb, anyone trying to police thought is probably the thought police. Great job Doc.

Expand full comment
Feb 18·edited Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

In the comment section where they interviewed him the first time, I provided some links to published research contradicting what Norman P. was saying about the impossibility of identifying how to modify virus for GoF and he was extremely rude, nasty and dismissive (checking now, he edited his comments to be less rude and instead accused me of working for Pfizer as that seems to be the go to tactic.) I have no science background but over the course of the pandemic era I had collected references to GoF related research. If I could find these things, how come this super expert seemed to be first unaware and then dismissive?

When someone from the inside of biodefense racket comes out and says GoF is all smoke and mirrors, directly contrary to their financial interests in keeping the field funded, there is a very solid reason to be deeply suspicious.

The problem for the defense establishment since the end of the cold war has been finding new enemies to justify their enormous budget. Saddam was an enemy they carefully seeded and groomed, so was Noriega. At the same time, the US groomed Al Qaeda as a global threat but right at the same time as that culminated they were working on the biodefense racket.

One of the most important things that RFK, Jr. pointed out in his new book is that the Patriot Act (passed in fear after the anthrax attacks conducted with US gov anthrax) included a provision that promised biowarfare researchers would be protected from legal repercussions of their work. From that point, the secretive work became more and more openly pursued under NIH.

Invisible pathogens are an ideal enemy that can be everywhere, all the time and justify enormous spending so it makes no sense for someone in that industry to come out and say its all impossible anyway. Even if it were impossible to make truly lethal and controllable pathogens, they'd lie and say they have a way to do it.

Just as an aside, don't be surprised if they dust off terrorism and bring it back since pandemic threats are a bit worn out with the public for the time being.

Here are my comments on that first interview article

https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/an-explosive-discussion-with-ex-cdc?r=pced8&utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=42748253

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

It is too early in the morning....but I cannot remember........all of the bioweapons that have been created are bacteria, like Lyme, asperwhatever, etc.////right??????

But has a virus bioweapon been created? Maybe? Maybe Covid 19? Can it be proven ? Yes?

But then, can it go around the world, as it is an RNA virus?...ie without infectious clones being released?

Anyone?

Expand full comment
author

That's what we are trying to find out

Expand full comment
May 8·edited May 8

Dr. Syed please keep us apprised of what you find. I am very interested in the question of 1) can Rna viruses go around the world or do they go through so many people that they become relatively harmless by the time they are done and 2) I do believe covid was engineered...but I want to know if they are capable of going around the world at the same virulence or pathogenicity because they are built on RNA....and can they be made replication-able. OR DO THEY also mutate into a lesser form?

And 3) God help us if they are messing about with DNA viruses....

Here is my current belief....there hasn't been an Rna pandemic since the invention of antibiotics..because all the respitory ones turn into bacterial pneumonia....and we need to stop putting DNA plasmids with the antibiotic resistance gene or whatever into our animals our food and us humans.

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

Lyme is modified Borrelia. Aspergillus is ancient.

Expand full comment

I have chronic Lyme...and chronic fatigue..so I wonder if they also put the mycoplasma into the ticks....

Expand full comment

Interesting thought. However, I noticed no sequelae after I took tetracycline. Durn Delawareans don't harvest many of their deer!

Expand full comment

I remember my first bulls eye...but I got bit with no sequelae several other times...and then another bullseye in 2020..hard to avoid ticks here....they don't always leave a bullseye...but you can still get it..you got to wait a few weeks to see if you have the Lyme antibodies..and I didn't know that...so I just assumed I was good. NOPE:-). The test for Lyme is crap..like the PCR.. ..so I don't wait anymore..find the tick,,,pull it off..freeze it. And take antibiotics don't wait!

Expand full comment
Feb 20Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

asperwhatever = aspergillus is a mold.

Measles is an RNA virus. For that matter, so is the common cold. They seem to travel around quite well!

Expand full comment
Feb 20Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I had German measles and chicken pox. Never measles....and not many colds unless I was deficient in Vit. D.

I am not convinced...I do know that influenza and other flu type things arise with the electrification of our world...radar, etc.

But I had chicken pox...my sisters had one pox a piece. I kinda think it is transmitted by touch/sores. Not through the air.

Expand full comment

I thought measles was dna? Stand ready to be corrected...

Expand full comment

Our government is a mess - look at how they killed the Tea Party movement as an example. Infiltrated it and then Murdered it! I remember a group of black politicians walking through the crowd at one rally in DC, with press following them, just hoping to God someone said something racist so they could dismiss the whole movement. Disgusting is what our government is! Our rallies were peaceful, wholesome, family oriented and clean. The place was cleaner when we left than when we arrived. The press continually lied about how many attended too. Contrary to every leftist rally/protest which promoted violence and left the city a mess every single time. I despise leftists.

Expand full comment

If lies and hypocrisy were a store of value, every leftist would be a multi billionaire. lol

Expand full comment
Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

I actually wondered a while back if someone hijacked Nick's Twitter account and I stopped following him. The GOF subject is no longer a question. We have plenty of proof and witnesses. It seems Nick and his friend either have a nefarious agenda or they're stupid and we know it's not the latter.

Expand full comment
author

GoF is not as scary as it is made out to be. The scare is the threat, being used by governments to impose biofascism. On that they are correct yet to conflate this with the total denial of biowarfare agents is delusion.

We advocate for the shutting down of the whole field of virology until prosecutions are complete. If that takes 20 years to be it. The onus is now on the field of virology to prove that they have ever created more cures than disease.

Expand full comment

That's our position in a nutshell. You're basically saying you agree with us, except for the "total denial of biowarfare agents" bit, which is a fabrication all of your own. So the only question is, why the paranoid linky-link article, written in the style of an intelligence community asset?

Expand full comment
author

In the style of an intelligence community asset? What's that style exactly? Do you have a manual you can lend me so I can see what you mean? Please and thank you

Expand full comment

Sure. Here's an example from three years ago co-authored by a known IC asset trying to paint PANDA as "alt-right" and to link it to David Icke and Nigel Farage. Yours reads the same.

https://bylinetimes.com/2021/02/02/cambridge-analytica-psychologist-advising-global-covid-19-disinformation-network-linked-to-nigel-farage-and-conservative-party/

Expand full comment
author

Are you kidding? That's propaganda in the "byline times". The links in my article are authoritative.

I haven't used any smears and not mentioned "alt right". I am simply asking why you are attacking people who dare to say that gain of function research is going on, and why you are using someone involved in the purveyor of biological weapons research to endorse your attacks.

You're projecting and you are digging a hole. I didn't ask you to dig the hole I just showed you where the spade was.

If you believe I have said something factually incorrect or that draws an overtly incorrect inference let me know and I will review it.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

I like this suggestion.

Expand full comment

I am not taking any position on virology or terrain or gain of function vs bio-weapons, I just try to absorb bits from all sides and stew on it a bit. But, is it possible for GoF to exist without viruses? I think most certainly. Whatever it is they are working with, be it viruses or poisons or toxins, whatever, .... forcing it to be nastier, qualifies. And at the end of the day, does it really matter which? We all have known for quite some time the coof was 98.8% survivable without treatment, so if they were doing gain of function to make it deadlier, well, I think they were doing a fairly shitty job of it.

Expand full comment

It may be much deeper than that

https ://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-and-illegal-us-bioweapons-activity-an-insiders-revelations-2432.pdf

Expand full comment

That is a very, very powerful article. I've read Klassen before and find him believable. I looked up most of the references in this article and they all panned out. He is tying a lot of threads together and his personal involvement is powerful. Of course, it could all be BS and a distraction, but I'd be very interested to hear others' interpretations.

Expand full comment

100 percent agree. They are planning more pandemics until we fall in line...I am furious they are so dammed open about it.

Expand full comment

If hijacked, El(y)on Muskoxshit will never correct it.

Expand full comment
Feb 18·edited Feb 18Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed

This, along with the interview by Tucker of Mike Benz, is enough to make me realize how “F-ed” we really are! For those who think we’re going to be saved by the election of 1 man, they are in for a rude awakening. This is way past being fixed by one election. This is world wide, and the hole is so deep I’m not sure this is fixable in the near future. Nonetheless, I will not give in, I will not stop fighting and I’m in for the long haul. I will double down. I just caution everyone to have a realistic view of the battle we are faced with and to not just sit around thinking they can just wait until the next election so someone else can fix it!

Expand full comment

Great Article, doc. But did the U.S. DoD send Coronavirus bioweapons to the UK and other countries prior to 2000, which was directly related to the DoD’s Coronavirus research & development in the United States from 1958-1967-1993-2014-2020…? YES. YES, Damnit.

This story of Bioweapons is much older than most wish to admit, like most war-weapon profiteering stories, and all of it began in the United States, NOT China, though it did end up there much later, as well as over two hundred other foreign labs—like those currently being funded by the U.S. in Ukraine, Israel and France—which nobody talks about either.

This link (https://open.substack.com/pub/jeffreyplubina/p/the-most-important-video-and-audio?r=1qpmjb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web) provides information bridging some of the gaps dating back prior to 1900. The very first short clip will give you nightmares, and as you go down the list you may need meditation or perhaps whiskey shots in between clips to remain calm.

Expand full comment