Well, it's on a page of a newsletter telling us about how certain things that corporations pay to have mandated are responsible for harm & death & it points to a legal, non-violent means of ending those mandates.
I THOUGHT that writing such on a page like this would cause people to say "this is GREAT! I value the lives of children WAY M…
Well, it's on a page of a newsletter telling us about how certain things that corporations pay to have mandated are responsible for harm & death & it points to a legal, non-violent means of ending those mandates.
I THOUGHT that writing such on a page like this would cause people to say "this is GREAT! I value the lives of children WAY MORE than I value Mitch McConnell's illegal pension fund."
My mistake. Apparently, providing solutions to problems = "spamming" when one is more concerned with retaining their World View about Daddy-Government than saving the lives of children.
Well, it's on a page of a newsletter telling us about how certain things that corporations pay to have mandated are responsible for harm & death & it points to a legal, non-violent means of ending those mandates.
I THOUGHT that writing such on a page like this would cause people to say "this is GREAT! I value the lives of children WAY MORE than I value Mitch McConnell's illegal pension fund."
My mistake. Apparently, providing solutions to problems = "spamming" when one is more concerned with retaining their World View about Daddy-Government than saving the lives of children.
I won't bother YOU again.
Ok