In fact it was "uncivil", but I should have perhaps said "patronising". You're simply putting forward what you think is correct, and in truth it might be, but equally it might not. Thank you
I see nothing wrong with the comment in question. You are right that he is calling you out on "You're not paying attention and still harbouring the mindset that the NZ govt are acting with probity.", but to immediately claim it's "patronizing" is to disregard any possibility of error on your part.
No it isn't an error, it's simply my opinion. I thought the response was patronising but if you didn't think so we shall have to agree to disagree, no problem.
You're not paying attention and still harbouring a mindset that the NZ govt are acting with probity.
If Barry Young is a whistleblower how has he ended up in jail? It would be against the law to prosecute him.
https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/publications/protected-disclosures-act-2022/
Try to keep it civil
There is nothing un-civil in my question. Try to keep on track. Thank you
In fact it was "uncivil", but I should have perhaps said "patronising". You're simply putting forward what you think is correct, and in truth it might be, but equally it might not. Thank you
I see nothing wrong with the comment in question. You are right that he is calling you out on "You're not paying attention and still harbouring the mindset that the NZ govt are acting with probity.", but to immediately claim it's "patronizing" is to disregard any possibility of error on your part.
No it isn't an error, it's simply my opinion. I thought the response was patronising but if you didn't think so we shall have to agree to disagree, no problem.