The thing that causes me the most concern is that Govts won't acknowledge any excess deaths yet statisticians, insurance actuaries and whistle-blowers are indicating something is happening. Until there is a recognition of a change happening, no-one can determine any underlying causes. Simply denying there is an issue is highly suspicious. I'm old enough to remember times when anyone claiming there was an issue with anything, evidence would be produced to prove them wrong. Nowadays, problems seem to be answered by saying 'no, there's not'.
I don't really need the individualised Vax data to show a link between excess deaths and the jab. If you simply take 2020 as the datum, a year in which NZ closed its borders and kept out winter disease and compare it to 2021 when the same conditions prevailed, you will see in the older cohorts a dramatic increase in death rates over that of 2020, beginning around week 17 and continuing until week 47. This coincides with the vaccine rollout to the elderly, beginning around week 15. Then, in 2022 we see an even more dramatic rise in deaths above the 2020 datum, coinciding with booster rollout in late January and the latter stage of the primary course for the younger cohorts over 18,, driven by mandates in the workplace, that kicked in in November 2021 . I personally know of one work colleague, 54 who died 3-days after his booster taken in late January. Another, this time only 50, had a debilitating stroke that left him as an invalid after his second jab in December 2021. Unbelievably, he got a booster in late March and went down hill even further. If you use 2015-2019 as your reference data, you have to factor in the bad flu years of 2017 and 2019. They are outliers compared to 2020. A compromise would be to take 2018 death rates and compare them to the pandemic years years. One can do this via the shinyapp at the HMD.
4-5% of deaths amongst the elderly in New Zealand-increases in rates of death per 1,000 in elderly cohorts around 20% - were there more than twice the vaxx deaths?
Using my approximate population adjusted mortality rates, there is a very large increase in excess deaths amongst the elderly over 2022, which - from a prior article - occurred specifically in the the NZ sutumn/winter of 2022
(The other article with unadjusted for population deaths by month is here:
Dec 26, 2023·edited Dec 26, 2023Liked by Dr Ah Kahn Syed, OpenVAET
My comment seems to have been deleted?
Shame, I am a Kiwi but perhaps had too much to say about Liz and Kirsch and their scam and yes, Im a avid member of the community fighting for freedom myself and am disgusted with this BS expose. I am totally onto this global agenda and how they are doing it and have a pretty good idea on who our own infiltrators and Controlled Operatives are.
Perhaps one thing I can say is that Kirsch made out his server was taken down and that he was "ghosted" by wasabi, when in fact I had accessed it multiple times, even when I saw him claim it had been closed and have the screenshot that shows me clearly logged in.
We dont need this drama from Liz and Kirsch. Where Liz was clearly also targeting Winston Peters. I wont go into what I was talking about in the comment that didnt get through. Other than to say she seems to make it suddenly an urgent matter that he didnt respond to. When he was in fact behind closed doors making coalition deals AND Barry had already been sitting on this "data" and working with other groups for at least 8 months? AND just prior to this, she also set up another political party NZL that had a hickup with registration and failed getting anywhere, why? to take votes from the real threat NZ First?
Anyway, Our truther community did NOT need this drama from Liz. Seems shes only out to cause chaos and division IMHO posing as a truther. Lucky Winston still got in despite the votes she stole and he is making clear changes which includes a public inquiry that will include the efficacy and safety of these vaccines. Im sure he will have experts in their fields already who have expert "qualified" evidence. There was also a recent article by another substacker that shows far more reliable evidence of vaccine damage and possible deaths via our own VAERS.
Your articles are briliiantly written, amongst the best I have read.
I have come to the conclusion that not many properly understand time-series cohort analysis and I think Steve Kirsch has a valid point that the criticisms of his analysis are based on ignoring the fundamentals of time-series cohort analysis and going off and doing something else. The first set of doses seems to have been administered mostly over a 9 month period from 17/7/21 to 18/3/22 which is a time interval that extends significantly past the Winter. I would assume the younger age groups were vaccinated later than the vulnerable/ older age groups and that would have been past the Winter when ACM rates would be expected to fall dramatically for them. But the mortality rates rose persistently higher after vaccination for all age groups. To me this would be a clear signal of vaccine harm unless there was some other non-seasonality confounder.
I salute both you and Steve - you are both inspirations to me and warriors in this fight. None of us can truly divine the motives of each other as that is a mental phenomenon. I regard both of you with the utmost integrity. I regard this dispute as friendly fire and hope the debate will be confined to the data and its analysis rather than personalities or motives.
The thing that causes me the most concern is that Govts won't acknowledge any excess deaths yet statisticians, insurance actuaries and whistle-blowers are indicating something is happening. Until there is a recognition of a change happening, no-one can determine any underlying causes. Simply denying there is an issue is highly suspicious. I'm old enough to remember times when anyone claiming there was an issue with anything, evidence would be produced to prove them wrong. Nowadays, problems seem to be answered by saying 'no, there's not'.
If that’s the case, they won’t mind releasing the rest of the data
I don't really need the individualised Vax data to show a link between excess deaths and the jab. If you simply take 2020 as the datum, a year in which NZ closed its borders and kept out winter disease and compare it to 2021 when the same conditions prevailed, you will see in the older cohorts a dramatic increase in death rates over that of 2020, beginning around week 17 and continuing until week 47. This coincides with the vaccine rollout to the elderly, beginning around week 15. Then, in 2022 we see an even more dramatic rise in deaths above the 2020 datum, coinciding with booster rollout in late January and the latter stage of the primary course for the younger cohorts over 18,, driven by mandates in the workplace, that kicked in in November 2021 . I personally know of one work colleague, 54 who died 3-days after his booster taken in late January. Another, this time only 50, had a debilitating stroke that left him as an invalid after his second jab in December 2021. Unbelievably, he got a booster in late March and went down hill even further. If you use 2015-2019 as your reference data, you have to factor in the bad flu years of 2017 and 2019. They are outliers compared to 2020. A compromise would be to take 2018 death rates and compare them to the pandemic years years. One can do this via the shinyapp at the HMD.
I have been checking out mortality data in NZ over the pandemic in the last year.
This is from a top-down perspective, not trying to break down vaxx v unvaxx causes.
I think there is an issue amongst men and women over the age of 75 years.
What do you think of this?
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/deaths-with-c19-present-were-around
4-5% of deaths amongst the elderly in New Zealand-increases in rates of death per 1,000 in elderly cohorts around 20% - were there more than twice the vaxx deaths?
Using my approximate population adjusted mortality rates, there is a very large increase in excess deaths amongst the elderly over 2022, which - from a prior article - occurred specifically in the the NZ sutumn/winter of 2022
(The other article with unadjusted for population deaths by month is here:
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/zooming-in-on-nz-mortality-data-80
-84 year olds by month and gender – what happened in the autumn and winter of 2022?
No statistics will replace the tragedy of loosing own family members to the illegal, thus CRIMINAL GENE THERAPIES.
Logical, the last 3 right questions are extremely important! Thanks for the inspirations to these thoughts.
I don't need data or anything else to tell me what I know.
Its the data John West reject that makes John West the best.
DARN IT!
And we were so close to busting this thing wide open just like last year with JORDON WALKER AND DIRECTED EVOLUTION! 😅
The function of a rodeo clown is to divert the bull with jackassery so the bullrider can get up and run away.
The published interview seemed completely contrived, rehearsed. I said as much right away, bad smell.
Probably take ten years of data from the experiment to work anything out, I see dead people!
Oh i love the teamwork!
🙏🙏
SAFE and EFFECTIVE.
SAFE and EFFECTIVE
My comment seems to have been deleted?
Shame, I am a Kiwi but perhaps had too much to say about Liz and Kirsch and their scam and yes, Im a avid member of the community fighting for freedom myself and am disgusted with this BS expose. I am totally onto this global agenda and how they are doing it and have a pretty good idea on who our own infiltrators and Controlled Operatives are.
Perhaps one thing I can say is that Kirsch made out his server was taken down and that he was "ghosted" by wasabi, when in fact I had accessed it multiple times, even when I saw him claim it had been closed and have the screenshot that shows me clearly logged in.
We dont need this drama from Liz and Kirsch. Where Liz was clearly also targeting Winston Peters. I wont go into what I was talking about in the comment that didnt get through. Other than to say she seems to make it suddenly an urgent matter that he didnt respond to. When he was in fact behind closed doors making coalition deals AND Barry had already been sitting on this "data" and working with other groups for at least 8 months? AND just prior to this, she also set up another political party NZL that had a hickup with registration and failed getting anywhere, why? to take votes from the real threat NZ First?
Anyway, Our truther community did NOT need this drama from Liz. Seems shes only out to cause chaos and division IMHO posing as a truther. Lucky Winston still got in despite the votes she stole and he is making clear changes which includes a public inquiry that will include the efficacy and safety of these vaccines. Im sure he will have experts in their fields already who have expert "qualified" evidence. There was also a recent article by another substacker that shows far more reliable evidence of vaccine damage and possible deaths via our own VAERS.
Gaslight attempt possibly? Before the next push. Share prices falling.
"Well, that just tears it !!" My old fading memory isn't certain if that was ~Frank Burns, from M.A.S.H,
Your articles are briliiantly written, amongst the best I have read.
I have come to the conclusion that not many properly understand time-series cohort analysis and I think Steve Kirsch has a valid point that the criticisms of his analysis are based on ignoring the fundamentals of time-series cohort analysis and going off and doing something else. The first set of doses seems to have been administered mostly over a 9 month period from 17/7/21 to 18/3/22 which is a time interval that extends significantly past the Winter. I would assume the younger age groups were vaccinated later than the vulnerable/ older age groups and that would have been past the Winter when ACM rates would be expected to fall dramatically for them. But the mortality rates rose persistently higher after vaccination for all age groups. To me this would be a clear signal of vaccine harm unless there was some other non-seasonality confounder.
I salute both you and Steve - you are both inspirations to me and warriors in this fight. None of us can truly divine the motives of each other as that is a mental phenomenon. I regard both of you with the utmost integrity. I regard this dispute as friendly fire and hope the debate will be confined to the data and its analysis rather than personalities or motives.