24 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

No. Gp-120 has effects on t-cells and potentially neurological effects. There is no way that they can know that these inserts are safe. The only winning move is not to play.

Expand full comment
David Connell's avatar

Is it possible they included those nasty sequences in the spike protein knowing that a simple respiratory viral infection would stay in the lungs and not be dangerous for most people catching it. But that the plan was to deliver the spike protein including these toxic sequences via the so called vaccine.

Expand full comment
MarcusBierce's avatar

Thank you so much for your work Arcmedic! Quick question: Did the spike protein exist in nature naturally, before their manufacture in these bio labs? If so, when weтАЩre they first discovered in nature?

Expand full comment
NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter's avatar

This is the part where I start to get confused, even with my own thoughts. So Covid is not particularly dangerous but Gp-120 means it might be? Definitely avoid the vaccine but also avoid getting Covid?

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

We literally don't know. If I had a choice I would avoid COVID and avoid the vaccine. Yet there is no way to avoid COVID even if you spend your life inside your house, as you will just destroy your immune system. The only thing you might be able to do is avoid the vaccine. Given that the spike protein from the virus and vaccine are the same, and the vaccine spike is magnitudes higher in quantity than anything that a virus can throw at you, your best bet is to be exposed to the virus as much as you can, whilst taking mitigating measures, hopefully creating immunity from dead viral fragments such that you have some mucosal immunity to prevent viraemia. Injecting those same spike protein inducing mRNAs (actually cDNAs now that we know about the plasmids) is playing with fire.

Expand full comment
NE - Naked Emperor Newsletter's avatar

Agreed. Thanks for your replies! Out of interest, have you had Covid (well, SARS-CoV-2)?

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

How come I haven't had "Covid" for 3.5 years and am surrounded by people who have had "Covid" according to the fraudulent PCR test results?

I also know many other people who have never had "Covid" so what gives?

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Because you're AI?

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Why don't knock it off with the childish insults and engage in honest intellectual debate.

Aren't you violating the same principles you claim to uphold?

You do not source your material very well- is this why you fear rigorous scrutiny and debate?

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Allen, you are signed up to a huge list of substacks yet don't have your own. Your posts are intentionally antagonistic with few sources and the idea that I don't source my articles is a joke. Why are you even here if you think my articles have no substance?

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Why don't you comment on the substance of what was posted?

There was no pandemic, there's no Covid- there was a massive operation.

Wake up.

Those of us who have been around these phony pandemics for two decades plus know far more about what is happening than you do and were calling out what was about to happen as early as January 2020.

You use insults and diversions to avoid discussing these falsehoods so as to avoid losing credibility. Instead you should use this as an opportunity to learn from others who have far more experience in this realm than you. However you don't strike me as someone who has the humility to challenge their assumptions so you get stuck peddling false assumptions.

You say you invite pushback. That is false. You can't handle pushback especially if it is from people who know what they are talking about.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Allen you post on multiple substacks multiple times a day, with long posts. Your posts go from sycophantic to derisory. If you truly are what you say you are, why haven't you written your own substack?

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

Please try to stick to substantive issues. You are endlessly immersed in distractions and diversions.

Please admit you have never looked into the data from Italy and NYC in Spring 2020.

Broaden your lens a bit and learn more about the actual history of disease.

Can your imagination not think of a world beyond substack and twitter?

The COVID phenomenon cannot be understood without understanding the un-televised 2019-2020 unprecedented financial collapse threatening the entire global financial system.

The "timely" arrival of the Covid-19 тАЬemergencyтАЭ provided the rationale and the opportunity to freeze the US banking collapse with massive injections of cash. Somewhere in the neighborhood of $8-10 trillion was paid to US banks up until March 2020 with an additional $5 trillion in economic stimulus promised by the Fed.

The Covid-19 Pandemic story makes little sense when viewed through the lens of health, safety and science. Viewed through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer, however, then all of it makes perfect sense.

Manufactured pandemics are now mammoth investment opportunities that increase the wealth of billionaires and further consolidate their power.

As the тАЬWar on TerrorтАЭ illustrated, these deep events are constructed to exploit as many different lines of acquisition as possible. With the тАЬCovid PandemicтАЭ replacing the phony тАЬWar on TerrorтАЭ yet another revamped тАЬworldwide crisisтАЭ miraculously morphs into a ruling class multi-purpose golden opportunity.

Covid-19, the disease, is nothing more than a disease of FALSE ATTRIBUTION.

Covid-19, the media event, was the Trojan Horse constructed to usher in a complete transformation of our society.

Covid-19, the operation, was never an epidemiological event, it is a business model meant to increase the portfolios of the super-wealthy.

There is no such thing as тАЬCovid 19тАЭ except as a criminal conspiracy.

Expand full comment
Dr Ah Kahn Syed's avatar

Just to clarify, you are stating that there is no such thing as a symptomatic disease that is associated with a defined gene sequences for "SARS-COV-2" detectable at the time of that disease.

Is that your premise?

It's difficult to work out when you flip flop so much.

Expand full comment
Coralie's avatar

Some people do have natural immunity. Family of four in our house - three of us got fluey symptoms and tested positive on PCR, one didnтАЩt. This family member also went to an event where all his friends got Covid but he did not. Our working hypothesis (supported by a very flimsy BBC article from 10 years ago about unusual antibodies) is that heтАЩs the only in the family who had swine flu years ago and it may have left him with additional immunity protection.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

I happen to study the history of disease, the politics of disease and the industry that creates both the belief and the markets for disease.

Everything you (and most people) think you know about disease is fraudulent. The mythologies surrounding disease are one of the most persistent and widespread propagdabda devices in our current society.

"All his friends got Covid" means nothing. There is no such thing as "Covid" as a unique pathological manifestation.

PCR is worse than useless for diagnostics.

The тАЬgenomic sequencingтАЭ for SARS-CoV-2 is complete fraud. The Corman-Drosten team developed the test for Covid-19 based on an In-silico Genetic Sequence (from a computer simulation).

They did not have any Viral Isolates of Covid-19 available, nor any clinical samples of anyone sick with the alleged new disease. Simply based on that, the test is invalid.

A new medical test must be validated against a 'Gold Standard", that is, a test which is 100% accurate.

The Corman-Drosten team, used the SARS sequence from 2003 (which was never properly purified or isolated, the same procedure was done with this virus as well), they then used the PCR primer related to that sequence, amplified it using PCR, sequenced what they amplified (they did this multiple times) and used the sequences that were different from the SARS sequence to develop primers for the diagnostic test. However, since there were no purified samples or Isolates of any kind, this entire experiment is made up.

A PCR test is not a diagnostic test, as it does not test for the presence of a virus, it simply tests for genetic material/genetic debri and must be coupled with Clinical Representation of a specific set of symptoms.

It turns out, when you input the sequences that are being tested for, to show a positive case, the sequences show up 93 times in the human genome, and approx. 91 times from Bacteria/Fungi (Microbes). These supposed "New" sequences show up in nature and are not new at all.

Nevermind, you cannot possibly say these sequences are coming from a "new virus" if you don't have the virus in the first place.

The team then sends this test to China, to test for this "Novel" virus that they created a test for, with none of the "Novel" virus at their disposal.

The Chinese find these sequences in their 'Atypical Pneumonia" patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms, (obviously being that these sequences show up in humans), and they create an entire "Genome" based off of 1 Clinical Sample.

In order to create a Genome correctly, you would need hundreds upon thousands of samples to develop an actual accurate "Viral Genome", they took 1 person that tested positive with a PCR test created without any virus.

They take a Clinical Sample from a PCR Positive person's lung fluid, with symptoms consistent to "Atypical Pneumonia". They take only the Short RNA strands from the clinical sample, and put them into a Computer Program, these Programs being: Megahit and Trinity.

These two programs assemble a bunch of Contigs (Possible Genome structures) made up of all the short RNA strands from the person, which number 56 Million.

The Trinity computer came up with 1,329,960 Contigs ranging from 201-11,760 base pairs, the Megahit computer came up with 384,096 contigs ranging from 200-30,474 base pairs. In layman, the computer generated almost 2 Million possible Genome Structures.

The longest contig (30,474 base pairs) was chosen, simply because it was the longest one. Upon further investigation, this genome was only 80% similar to SARS-COV 1 bat-like sequence. They then add some Sars 1 Sequences to make it look more like a SARS virus.

80%, is less similar than what humans are to house cats. The claim was the Genome totaled to 29,903 bases long, which negates 571 bases from the contig, if those weren't valid how do we know this entire contig is valid?

The Contig chosen, was created out of 123,613 different pieces of short RNA from the clinical genetic sample.

They don't know where these sequences are coming from, they don't know if the genome is real, they don't know the amount of error in the process, they don't know how many "reads" were correct, this entire thing is theoretical and computer generated.

Then come thousands of papers and studies and reports all based on...Turtles All The Way Down.

Fraud.

Expand full comment
RussCR5187's avatar

Wait. I thought the spike protein from the virus and the vaccine were NOT the same. For example, wasn't pseudouridine substituted for uridine?

Expand full comment
Just a Clinician's avatar

Yes - but many people consider that a difference without a distinction physiologically.

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

There is the thought that Covid is slightly like airborne AIDS.

Time to treat your body very very well, IMHO.

And hang on to our rights to purchases vitamins, minerals & nutraceuticals over the counter, as well!

Expand full comment