I live in a poor Buddhist monastic school in Nepal. Some of my kids are brilliant, many are average. Three are not intelligent at all but they are sweet and kind hearted. I would fight to death to defend all of them.
Eugenics are not human. They are dangerous sad monsters.
The next time somebody challenges vaccine mandates in court, they should quote all this aspirational utopian language by historical mass murderers with a straight face, as if they were arguing FOR the policy, but citing the actual source the way you are supposed to do in a legal argument. Use the leftist argument FOR the policy, only cite the original source. "Lets do this for the common good" (Adolph Hitler, Policy for Nazi Eugenics, 1932). "Society is better with central control" (Pol Pot, 1965). "Therefore, the people are served when the government can cull undeseriables" (Josef Mengele, Auschwitz physician, 1930).
Theosophy once was the cult that many of these eugenic elitists hob knobbed with around the turn of the 20th century. Madame Blavatsky et al. We have a neo-theosophy tribe with the usual suspects like Bill Gates, Dr Fauci…
Craig Venter is another one that needs a steady spotlight on. He claims to be a god in his belief of having created ‘life’. His notoriety is the human genome project but that’s not all. I recommend people continue to deep dive into these unelected overlords. Remember their wives too. Dr Fauci’s wife has quite a conflict of interest- Christine Grady.
We have to realize eugenics has be perpetrated against the denizens of the world for almost 100 years.
In America, we had the Tuskegee syphilis program on blacks and the untold experiments on the Indian reservations like Rosebud in SD.
Are these eugenicists right?? God forbid. However, waking people up to the fact our governments want global slavery is not going very easily.
I suppose the question if a revolt were possible and eugenics was thoroughly debunked- but as Dr Syed pointed out- this grand plan years in the making- IS considered a UTOPIA; The Great Society, the culmination of human intellect at it’s finest. The people who proudly obeyed and took the vaxx think they will be included because they think they are smarter than those of us who questioned, argued against, and refused to take it. Sadly, they were the targets of elimination. But if there is a revolt what beliefs would resurrect in the vacuum left by this eugenic religion that was, all academia, science, literature, entertainment, media, and government were based upon?
Not being rhetorical the hint may be the Ten Commandments. Where did they come from and why do they remain relevant despite evolving culture?
This deserves more than one reading. I remember long ago, a teacher told me it is not a choice between good and evil....ethics are needed when you have to choose between two goods. And the hardest one is the individual vs. the community (collective).
I never forgot.
seems to me the US constitution is the only one that puts the individual before the community.
And you have also pointed out that it is a false binary choice.
Thank you. Those who say we must do this because the oil is running out, is ostensiby saying kiling people avoids the evils of cannabilism.
Without God/belief in a supreme creator, and that each life is an image of God...you have totalitarianism.
That a child might come along and find a way to live without oil, like a tesla, is never factored into the equation.
I'm always perplexed by Darwinist eugenicists. They profess to believe that only the fittest survive... like, as an automatic process. And then they insist they need to shepherd the process or it won't work. And they don't see the contradiction.
I've been doing some reading in this area myself with for example elite intellectuals like Bertrand Russell and other more obscure characters. Although they don't say this, all of their ideas rest on a fundamental assumption of their own superiority, which is always presented implicitly without any real attempt to justify it.
That is, if the "scientific" logic leads them to conclude that human beings have no intrinsic value but are just walking, talking meat blobs, what makes some of them fit to decide the fate of others? In essence, it is that they are better at talking up their own worth. Basically, they are superior con artists.
Why, for instance, would human beings of average intelligence, who work and eat and live happily, not be superior choices for the future of humankind compared to highly intelligent "scientific" talkers who spend their time plotting how to justify the murder of significant portions of the rest of humanity? They often also consume resources far in excess of an average intelligence person.
Isn't such elite sociopathy a trait that should be suppressed as damaging to the human race?
The fundamental contradiction is never resolved. The reality seems to be that those who justify eugenics and population control have only one real message to convey, "I am better than you." Their essential loathing of humanity and elevation of themselves is anti-human and that is the true core of their philosophy which eventually manifests itself clearly in the anti-human systems of "One Health" or "Climate Change."
The best elucidation of Utilitarianism, or the concept of 'the greater good' is Ursula le Guin's short story, The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.
It's the story of a utopia where everyone experiences great happiness at the expense of a single child who is locked away beneath the city to live in isolation and squalor. At some point, everyone learns that their city can only exist because of the suffering of this small child confined in the dark, unloved, malnourished, and dirty in its own faeces.
Some of the citizens decide that they cannot stomach the bargain and they are the ones who walk away from Omelas.
Read and compare the happening, statement, actions and effects of the last 4 years
In this essay published in 1958, Aldous Huxley examines whether the world he depicted in his 1932 novel Brave New World is becoming reality. He acknowledges that certain aspects have not come true, such as biological determination of caste or test tube fertilization, but argues that other societal trends are advancing his dystopian vision. He expresses concerns over the power of persuasion wielded by mass communication technologies and the dominance of economic and political philosophies that encourage overconsumption and undervaluation of individuality. However, he maintains hope that increasing knowledge of human instincts and motivations could help guide societies toward prioritizing mental health, non-attachment, and human freedom above all else.
"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."
Huxley discusses the possibility of a "scientific dictatorship" which he believes could easily arise in the future if current trends continue unabated. Some of the main points he makes about this idea:
Advances in science and technology could allow governments to gain increasing control over populations in both obvious and subtle ways. Things like mind-manipulating drugs, genetic engineering, and other biological and psychological techniques could play a role.
A scientific elite would likely come to hold authoritarian power, relying on their special expertise to rule without meaningful consent. They would justify this with claims of knowing what is best for society.
Facts could be manipulated through propaganda, only allowing the "facts" that support the rulers' agenda to be heard. Dissenting views may seem irrational when opposed by "scientific arguments."
Individual choice and independence may become things of the past as science dictates how we live, what we believe, and what we fight for. Citizens could become captive to technical rationality.
Freedom as we understand it may be difficult to uphold against the temptation for planners and conditioners to redesign humans. Science may overreach morality without self-awareness or restraint.
I wrote about all of this in my book 'The Great UN-Reset' available in all bookstores last year! Huxley was deeply involved in the inception of the UN. These people are all members of secret societies worshipping 'mystery religions' handed down through Babylonians to the Greeks and Romans. They are essentially Pagans - now you know why they drive disastrous Net-Zero and Sustainable Development Goals aligned with 'One Health' initiatives. They worship 'Mother (Isis) Nature' more than humanity!
He flat out stares cloud mind control of everything we see and think will be here & fully operational by 2029. But no worries the AI will only pick “good people” to be in charge.
Live Not By Lies by Dreher .... good book to strengthen your resolve to stand firm for whatever is coming next.... author is orthodox, talks about atmosphere around WWII... silence confers agreement... do not let a lie go unchallenged.
I had been trying to tell people about the eugenicist plan and the Huxley connection (people in Germany have been brainwashed to think that eugenics is a German invention, which it is clearly not), the culling of the useless eaters, homo deus for the last couple of years and even long before when Aaron Russo was still around. I stopped in 2023 because I was worn out.
This is a good article and I'll try sharing it, but those who know they know and the rest could not care less. It is still nice for me to see that others are finally getting the gist and write these brilliant pieces for those out there that read and listen.
We still have a long way ahead of us till we get to the bottom of why this happens.
I hated the Brave New World when I read it.
I live in a poor Buddhist monastic school in Nepal. Some of my kids are brilliant, many are average. Three are not intelligent at all but they are sweet and kind hearted. I would fight to death to defend all of them.
Eugenics are not human. They are dangerous sad monsters.
The next time somebody challenges vaccine mandates in court, they should quote all this aspirational utopian language by historical mass murderers with a straight face, as if they were arguing FOR the policy, but citing the actual source the way you are supposed to do in a legal argument. Use the leftist argument FOR the policy, only cite the original source. "Lets do this for the common good" (Adolph Hitler, Policy for Nazi Eugenics, 1932). "Society is better with central control" (Pol Pot, 1965). "Therefore, the people are served when the government can cull undeseriables" (Josef Mengele, Auschwitz physician, 1930).
Theosophy once was the cult that many of these eugenic elitists hob knobbed with around the turn of the 20th century. Madame Blavatsky et al. We have a neo-theosophy tribe with the usual suspects like Bill Gates, Dr Fauci…
Craig Venter is another one that needs a steady spotlight on. He claims to be a god in his belief of having created ‘life’. His notoriety is the human genome project but that’s not all. I recommend people continue to deep dive into these unelected overlords. Remember their wives too. Dr Fauci’s wife has quite a conflict of interest- Christine Grady.
We have to realize eugenics has be perpetrated against the denizens of the world for almost 100 years.
In America, we had the Tuskegee syphilis program on blacks and the untold experiments on the Indian reservations like Rosebud in SD.
Are these eugenicists right?? God forbid. However, waking people up to the fact our governments want global slavery is not going very easily.
I suppose the question if a revolt were possible and eugenics was thoroughly debunked- but as Dr Syed pointed out- this grand plan years in the making- IS considered a UTOPIA; The Great Society, the culmination of human intellect at it’s finest. The people who proudly obeyed and took the vaxx think they will be included because they think they are smarter than those of us who questioned, argued against, and refused to take it. Sadly, they were the targets of elimination. But if there is a revolt what beliefs would resurrect in the vacuum left by this eugenic religion that was, all academia, science, literature, entertainment, media, and government were based upon?
Not being rhetorical the hint may be the Ten Commandments. Where did they come from and why do they remain relevant despite evolving culture?
This deserves more than one reading. I remember long ago, a teacher told me it is not a choice between good and evil....ethics are needed when you have to choose between two goods. And the hardest one is the individual vs. the community (collective).
I never forgot.
seems to me the US constitution is the only one that puts the individual before the community.
And you have also pointed out that it is a false binary choice.
Thank you. Those who say we must do this because the oil is running out, is ostensiby saying kiling people avoids the evils of cannabilism.
Without God/belief in a supreme creator, and that each life is an image of God...you have totalitarianism.
That a child might come along and find a way to live without oil, like a tesla, is never factored into the equation.
Everything is considered finite on this planet.
I don't think everything is finite.
I'm always perplexed by Darwinist eugenicists. They profess to believe that only the fittest survive... like, as an automatic process. And then they insist they need to shepherd the process or it won't work. And they don't see the contradiction.
I've been doing some reading in this area myself with for example elite intellectuals like Bertrand Russell and other more obscure characters. Although they don't say this, all of their ideas rest on a fundamental assumption of their own superiority, which is always presented implicitly without any real attempt to justify it.
That is, if the "scientific" logic leads them to conclude that human beings have no intrinsic value but are just walking, talking meat blobs, what makes some of them fit to decide the fate of others? In essence, it is that they are better at talking up their own worth. Basically, they are superior con artists.
Why, for instance, would human beings of average intelligence, who work and eat and live happily, not be superior choices for the future of humankind compared to highly intelligent "scientific" talkers who spend their time plotting how to justify the murder of significant portions of the rest of humanity? They often also consume resources far in excess of an average intelligence person.
Isn't such elite sociopathy a trait that should be suppressed as damaging to the human race?
The fundamental contradiction is never resolved. The reality seems to be that those who justify eugenics and population control have only one real message to convey, "I am better than you." Their essential loathing of humanity and elevation of themselves is anti-human and that is the true core of their philosophy which eventually manifests itself clearly in the anti-human systems of "One Health" or "Climate Change."
"Yet utilitarians walk among us." You know it. And it's us or them, doc.
Looking forward to Part 2.
The best elucidation of Utilitarianism, or the concept of 'the greater good' is Ursula le Guin's short story, The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.
It's the story of a utopia where everyone experiences great happiness at the expense of a single child who is locked away beneath the city to live in isolation and squalor. At some point, everyone learns that their city can only exist because of the suffering of this small child confined in the dark, unloved, malnourished, and dirty in its own faeces.
Some of the citizens decide that they cannot stomach the bargain and they are the ones who walk away from Omelas.
Evil never rests.
IYH Thank you for Dr Syed - Amazon warrior of old - for still being in the fight.
FWIW 1932 Brave New World is incomplete w/o the prescient sequel "BNW revisited" 1958 https://www.huxley.net/bnw-revisited/
Read and compare the happening, statement, actions and effects of the last 4 years
In this essay published in 1958, Aldous Huxley examines whether the world he depicted in his 1932 novel Brave New World is becoming reality. He acknowledges that certain aspects have not come true, such as biological determination of caste or test tube fertilization, but argues that other societal trends are advancing his dystopian vision. He expresses concerns over the power of persuasion wielded by mass communication technologies and the dominance of economic and political philosophies that encourage overconsumption and undervaluation of individuality. However, he maintains hope that increasing knowledge of human instincts and motivations could help guide societies toward prioritizing mental health, non-attachment, and human freedom above all else.
"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."
Huxley discusses the possibility of a "scientific dictatorship" which he believes could easily arise in the future if current trends continue unabated. Some of the main points he makes about this idea:
Advances in science and technology could allow governments to gain increasing control over populations in both obvious and subtle ways. Things like mind-manipulating drugs, genetic engineering, and other biological and psychological techniques could play a role.
A scientific elite would likely come to hold authoritarian power, relying on their special expertise to rule without meaningful consent. They would justify this with claims of knowing what is best for society.
Facts could be manipulated through propaganda, only allowing the "facts" that support the rulers' agenda to be heard. Dissenting views may seem irrational when opposed by "scientific arguments."
Individual choice and independence may become things of the past as science dictates how we live, what we believe, and what we fight for. Citizens could become captive to technical rationality.
Freedom as we understand it may be difficult to uphold against the temptation for planners and conditioners to redesign humans. Science may overreach morality without self-awareness or restraint.
I wrote about all of this in my book 'The Great UN-Reset' available in all bookstores last year! Huxley was deeply involved in the inception of the UN. These people are all members of secret societies worshipping 'mystery religions' handed down through Babylonians to the Greeks and Romans. They are essentially Pagans - now you know why they drive disastrous Net-Zero and Sustainable Development Goals aligned with 'One Health' initiatives. They worship 'Mother (Isis) Nature' more than humanity!
You must watch Ray Kurzweil from last week.
He flat out stares cloud mind control of everything we see and think will be here & fully operational by 2029. But no worries the AI will only pick “good people” to be in charge.
WTF. He’s telling us what’s coming
Live Not By Lies by Dreher .... good book to strengthen your resolve to stand firm for whatever is coming next.... author is orthodox, talks about atmosphere around WWII... silence confers agreement... do not let a lie go unchallenged.
Climate ideology is Malthusian too.
I had been trying to tell people about the eugenicist plan and the Huxley connection (people in Germany have been brainwashed to think that eugenics is a German invention, which it is clearly not), the culling of the useless eaters, homo deus for the last couple of years and even long before when Aaron Russo was still around. I stopped in 2023 because I was worn out.
This is a good article and I'll try sharing it, but those who know they know and the rest could not care less. It is still nice for me to see that others are finally getting the gist and write these brilliant pieces for those out there that read and listen.
We still have a long way ahead of us till we get to the bottom of why this happens.
I can't believe billions were coerced into a medical experiment. Interesting that Dawkins jumped the shark with Sam Harris. Pair of idiots.